Approximately 36% of adult women in the United States are obese. Although obesity affects women similarly to men in terms of prevalence, there seem to be gender-specific differences in the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment of obesity. Obesity is linked to comorbid diseases involving multiple organ systems, including the gastrointestinal tract, like gastroesophageal reflux disease, fatty liver disease, and gallstones. This article focuses on obesity in women, specifically the impact of obesity on gastrointestinal diseases and reproductive health, as well as the treatment of obesity in women.
Key points
- •
Obesity is a multifactorial disease process that affects women differently than men.
- •
Severe obesity is more common in women.
- •
Complicated gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is less common in women.
- •
Obesity adversely affects fertility, conception, and maternal and fetal pregnancy outcomes.
- •
Obesity-related diet and exercise counseling should take into consideration gender differences in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical manifestations of obesity.
Introduction
Obesity is a well-known, chronic condition that affects individuals in all walks of life ( Table 1 ). Previously considered a disease of privilege, the worldwide obesity epidemic has had significant societal impact, ranging from the social stigma associated with obesity to costly, comorbid diseases. Research efforts have focused on all facets of obesity from the epidemiology to treatment strategies. Thus far, the work done in this area has revealed that, like other chronic diseases, intriguing gender differences exist between women and men. This article focuses on the epidemiologic and pathophysiologic features, clinical manifestations, and management of obesity-related disorders that are unique to women and pertinent to gastroenterologists.
Obesity-Related Characteristics in Women | |
---|---|
Epidemiology |
|
Sociology |
|
Pathophysiology | See Fig. 1 |
Comorbid GI illness | |
GERD-related disease | GERD complications (erosive esophagitis, Barrett esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma) less common |
NAFLD |
|
Gallstones | Higher prevalence common in women |
Reproductive health | See Table 2 |
Treatment | |
Behavioral modifications |
|
Bariatric surgery |
|
Introduction
Obesity is a well-known, chronic condition that affects individuals in all walks of life ( Table 1 ). Previously considered a disease of privilege, the worldwide obesity epidemic has had significant societal impact, ranging from the social stigma associated with obesity to costly, comorbid diseases. Research efforts have focused on all facets of obesity from the epidemiology to treatment strategies. Thus far, the work done in this area has revealed that, like other chronic diseases, intriguing gender differences exist between women and men. This article focuses on the epidemiologic and pathophysiologic features, clinical manifestations, and management of obesity-related disorders that are unique to women and pertinent to gastroenterologists.
Obesity-Related Characteristics in Women | |
---|---|
Epidemiology |
|
Sociology |
|
Pathophysiology | See Fig. 1 |
Comorbid GI illness | |
GERD-related disease | GERD complications (erosive esophagitis, Barrett esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma) less common |
NAFLD |
|
Gallstones | Higher prevalence common in women |
Reproductive health | See Table 2 |
Treatment | |
Behavioral modifications |
|
Bariatric surgery |
|
Epidemiology
All demographic segments of society, including age, race/ethnicity, and gender, have been impacted by the obesity epidemic. Overall, the prevalence of obesity is similar in women and men, with approximately one-third of adults in the United States being obese. Gender disparities in the prevalence of obesity have been described, however, in certain subpopulations. For example, when different racial groups are examined, obesity is more prevalent in non-Hispanic African American women than men (57% vs 37%, respectively). This gender disparity is not observed, however, in non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics, or Asians. Obesity also seems more prevalent in older women (age >60) than men. Furthermore, more severe forms of obesity affect women more commonly than men. The reasons for the epidemiologic gender disparities in obesity are unclear but may result from the culmination of pathophysiologic and sociologic differences between genders.
Pathophysiology
Obesity is thought to be the result of a multifactorial process driven primarily by excessive energy/caloric intake and inadequate physical activity. There are a minority of individuals affected by monogenetic disorders where a single gene mutation leads to obesity. Researchers have proposed gender-specific physiologic and biochemical differences, among other factors, to explain differences in excessive body weight in women and men.
Aspects of energy intake, utilization, and storage differ between women and men ( Fig. 1 ). Gender differences in energy metabolism have been reported, with studies showing a higher resting metabolic rate in men compared with women. In terms of fat storage, the less metabolically active form of fat, subcutaneous fat, is predominant in women. Meanwhile, visceral fat, which is more metabolically active, predominates in men. These factors favor a propensity for fat storage in a distribution that favors obesity in women more so than men. Furthermore, biochemical differences, such as higher circulating levels of leptin and adiponectin, both of which are involved in the regulation of food intake and satiety, have been described in women. Sex hormones may also play a role in the differential expression of obesity in women and men. Later in life, the proandrogen hormonal profile that is characterized by low levels of estrogen and increased levels of androgens has been observed in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. This hormone shift favors body fat redistribution with increased visceral fat, a phenotype that is seen in men and correlates with the higher prevalence (although not statistically significant) of obesity in women over 60 years of age.
Studies that examine eating behavior with respect to gender show that women exhibit significantly higher cognitive restraint, disinhibition scores, and hunger scores. It has also been reported that a greater proportion of women tend to engage in dieting behavior than men. Studies also show that in women, however, a history of dieting is positively associated with weight gain. It is possible that certain eating behaviors, such as cognitive restraint, are difficult to maintain and may result in increased fat intake and bingeing.
Sociology
Obesity is associated with a negative social stigma while societal standards of beauty have not evolved in parallel with the obesity epidemic. In general, women tend to be held to a different beauty aesthetic than men, which may influence the aforementioned behaviors related to food intake. Although obesity is common, studies show that weight-related bias is pervasive in workplaces, health care systems, interpersonal relationships, and the media, although it is unclear if gender differences in weight-related bias exist. The notion that weight is not modifiable contradicts the societal stigma of obesity. There are few data to confirm that society at large believes that weight is not modifiable, although a recent study showed that individuals who believed that weight is unchangeable had poor health practices. Gender was not associated with belief in weight changeability or exercise/dietary behavior. When compared with men, women are more likely to (1) be dissatisfied with their weight, (2) be dissatisfied with their body, and (3) associate body image with self-esteem. Nonetheless, positive body image has been shown an indicator of positive mental and physical health indices in both women and men. From a societal perspective, promoting the concept of self-acceptance and positive body image may ultimately translate into more widespread adoption of healthy lifestyle practices.
Obesity-associated gastrointestinal disease
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Obesity is a known risk factor for GERD. Given the established association between obesity and GERD, it is not surprising that the global obesity epidemic has been accompanied by an increased burden of symptomatic GERD and its complications. Although the existing literature suggests a similar prevalence of symptomatic GERD in women and men, GERD complications, such as erosive esophagitis, Barrett esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma, are less common in women.
Of the factors that contribute to GERD, increased abdominal pressure is often present in obesity. Central or abdominal adiposity results in increased abdominal pressure and is a risk factor for GERD complications independent of body mass index (BMI). Central adiposity is less common in women than men and may explain the lower prevalence of such complications in women. The role of sex hormones has been implicated to explain the different manifestations of GERD in women and men. Menon and colleagues showed, however, that increased estradiol levels were associated with physiologic GERD even when controlling for BMI.
Medical management, including behavioral modifications and acid suppressive therapy, is effective in ameliorating GERD symptoms. The association drawn between BMI and GERD has led to an emphasis on weight reduction as an important part of the behavioral modifications for GERD. One systematic review concluded that weight loss resulting from surgical or diet/lifestyle interventions can reduce or eliminate the symptoms of GERD while noting (1) a dose-response relationship between the degree of weight loss and resolution of GERD symptoms and (2) that women have a lower threshold for weight loss to achieve symptom improvement compared with men (5%–10% vs >10% weight reduction).
Obesity is a risk factor for GERD, which is similar in prevalence in women and men. Women are less likely to develop complications of GERD, however, and more likely to derive benefit from smaller amounts of weight loss than men.
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is often described as the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome, which involves insulin resistance, lipid metabolism, and obesity. Studies show strong correlations between NAFLD and obesity in women. In a large cohort study of more than 9300 women in China, 48% of obese women had NAFLD compared with 12.8% of the general population of women. Although the prevalence of NAFLD is similar in women and men, NAFLD is less common in premenopausal women versus age-matched men, perhaps due to a pathologic process involving the hormonal effects on fat distribution.
Although the pathogenesis of NAFLD remains an area of active research, it is known that the pattern of liver injury involves steatosis and cytotoxic liver injury. In obese individuals, the biochemical effects of increased body weight depress certain molecular anti-inflammatory pathways in the liver, enabling NAFLD to progress. Sex hormones are also linked to obesity and NAFLD. Perimenopausal and postmenopausal women have lower levels of estrogen and increased levels of androgens, a hormonal profile that favors the development of the metabolic syndrome and NAFLD via increased visceral fat deposition. The suggested protective effect of female sex hormones is corroborated by the epidemiologic findings that (1) there is a lower prevalence of NAFLD in premenopausal women compared with men of the same age, (2) women with NAFLD have significantly lower levels of serum estradiol compared with those without NAFLD, and (3) women older than age 50 have a higher prevalence of NAFLD than those younger than 50. It has been suggested that increased concentrations of estrogen inhibit the spontaneous secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor α, and possibly exert an antifibrogenic effect on the liver. Further studies of the pathophysiological link between obesity and gender may provide better insight into therapeutic targets for treating NAFLD.
Although studies suggest that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may be beneficial in treating NAFLD, to date there have been no prospective studies investigating this therapy. Weight loss is typically recommended for obese patients with NAFLD; however, the impact on the natural history of the disease is unclear. Modest weight loss of 5% to 10% or more of body weight can correct abnormal liver chemistries and decrease liver size, fat content, and features of steatohepatitis. Rapid weight loss after gastric bypass surgery, very-low-calorie diets, or prolonged fasting, however, lowers hepatic fat content but can induce hepatic inflammation, thereby worsening steatohepatitis. Because women are more likely than men to diet and undergo bariatric surgery gastroenterologists should be aware of their risk for this complication and emphasize the importance of slow, gradual as opposed to rapid, weight loss.
NAFLD in women is also linked to diabetes mellitus, the metabolic syndrome, low estrogen levels, and elevated androgen levels. Premenopausal women have a lower prevalence of NAFLD, likely due to the protective effect of estrogen. Effective treatment of NAFLD includes slow, gradual weight loss, which is favored over rapid weight loss that is seen with very-low-calorie diets.
Gallstone Disease
The link between gallstones and both women and obesity is well established. Gallstone disease is approximately 2 to 3 times more common in women than in men. The Nurses’ Health Study showed that elevated BMI is strongly linked to gallstone disease in women. Given the elevated risk for gallstone formation, particularly in obese women, researchers have worked to elucidate the pathways of gallstone formation in this high-risk group.
Cholesterol gallstones form with cholesterol saturation of bile and reduced gallbladder emptying. In obesity, cholesterol saturation of bile may occur as a result of dietary intake. Low-calorie/low-fat diets are linked to an increased likelihood of gallstone formation compared with a low-calorie/high-fat diet with the same weight loss. Although the weight loss process can increase the formation of gallstones, elevated BMI is an independent risk factor for gallstone disease in women, and the successful reduction of BMI is associated with a lower the risk of future gallstone development.
Similar to weight loss rates, hormonal influences have been linked to increased bile cholesterol saturation, which may result in gallstones. It is known that the gravidity of women is a predictor of gallstone formation. The high risk of gallstone formation in women is primarily observed in women of childbearing age. Estrogen is known to increase biliary cholesterol secretion, causing cholesterol supersaturation of the bile. This hormonal link to gallstone formation has also been invoked to explain the increased incidence of gallstones in other states of high estrogen levels, such as in postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy as well as in women using oral contraceptives. This relationship may be dose dependent, because women using low-estrogen oral contraceptives do not have an increased incidence of gallstones.
In light of the risk of gallstone formation with obesity and rapid weight loss, women should be encouraged to strive for slow, gradual weight reduction (2.2 kg per week). Primary prevention of gallstones can be achieved with pharmacologic agents, such as ursodeoxycholic acid, and has been used by some during periods of rapid weight loss, like postbariatric surgery. Because women are more likely than men to undergo postbariatric surgery, some investigators advocate the use of ursodeoxycholic acid after bariatric surgery.
Gallstone disease is significantly more prevalent in women than in men and is strongly linked to obesity. Both rapid weight loss and high estrogen levels are associated with the development of gallstones. Gradual weight loss and pharmacotherapy with ursodeoxycholic acid are both effective at preventing gallstone formation in obese women.
Obesity in reproductive health
Conception
Epidemiologic data suggest that obesity negatively affects reproductive health. One study showed that obesity was more prevalent in a cohort of women seeking medical attention to become pregnant. In addition, the time required to achieve a spontaneous pregnancy is longer and pregnancy rates are lower in obese women, including obese women with regular ovulation. The risk of infertility is 3-fold higher in obese women than in nonobese women in both natural and assisted conception cycles. Although weight loss can improve fertility, the benefits of weight loss are best seen in women under 35 years old.
The pathophysiologic impact of obesity on reproduction is a complex, multifactorial process and ranges from menstrual dysfunction to infertility. Specifically, obesity is associated with (1) oligo-ovulation/anovulation, (2) abnormal oocyte recruitment/ovulation and poor oocyte quality, (3) poor embryo quality and development, and (4) decreased uterine receptivity and embryo implantation. Several biochemical alterations in obese women may explain the physical manifestations. First, white adipose tissue regulates energy homeostasis and metabolism by secreting adipokines, leading to insulin resistance. The resulting hyperinsulinemia stimulates ovarian androgen production and increases peripheral aromatization of sex hormones. Conversion of excess androgens to estrogens in adipose tissue leads to increased free estrogen, which impairs the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. The hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis is further impaired by decreased luteinizing hormone, androstenedione, estrone, insulin, triglycerides, and very low-density lipoprotein. These factors may alter gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion (via negative feedback), altering follicular development and leading to irregular or anovulatory cycles.
Pregnancy
As seen in the general population, the prevalence of obesity in pregnant women has dramatically increased since the early 1990s, and now 28% of pregnant women are obese. Obesity affects both maternal and fetal pregnancy outcomes ( Table 2 ).