Giovanni Battista Morgagni (1682–1771) was an Italian anatomist, regarded as the father of modern anatomical pathology. (Public domain reproduced from Wikipedia.org)
It is interesting to note that the first description of a HH was performed by X-ray. In that same year, the first surgical intervention for HH was described [16]. Eppinger in 1911 summarized the literature on diaphragmatic hernia and reported that of 635 cases of herniation through various portions of the diaphragm, only 11 involved the esophageal hiatus [15]. Akerlund in 1926 proposed the term HH and classified it in the three types we use today [7]. Bernstein in 1947 reviewed the HH theme and concluded that one of the reasons for the low number of diagnoses was that HH could be missed by autopsy as muscles are relaxed and intra-abdominal pressure decreased [17]. The technique of X-ray examination with the patient in the upright posture generally also fails to visualize these hernias. Examination in a reclining or even Trendelenburg position with application of manual pressure to the upper abdomen is necessary to demonstrate HH. These hernias may disappear as soon as the patient is brought back into the upright posture, or the increased abdominal pressure is released [16].
Allison’s 20-year follow-up showed good results with improvement of symptoms in 80% of patients. Modern attempts to correct HH without other procedure such as a fundoplication failed to control GERD adequately [20]. HH repair, however, was granted as a necessary part of anatomical restoration to control GERD.
Angle of His Restoration: Early Attempts to Control GERD
As a consequence, the angle of His gained importance as an indispensable antireflux mechanism. It is important to note that while Allison focused on the reduction of HH and adequate closure of the diaphragmatic sling, Barrett prioritized restoration of the cardioesophageal angle as a critical element in preventing reflux [7].
The Rise of the Fundoplication
The Nissen technique was first introduced during the operation of a young patient with a distal esophageal ulcer penetrating the pericardium. After resection of the distal esophagus and cardia, the anastomosis was protected wrapping the distal esophagus with the posterior wall of the stomach. The patient had an excellent recovery and did not develop esophagitis. It is of notice that the short gastric blood vessels were not ligated, and the hiatus was not approximated. As such, the ideal antireflux operation was not perfected yet [25–28].
The Technical Evolution of the Fundoplication
Other authors such as Jacques Dor [30] and Vicente Guarner [31] also proposed different partial fundoplications [32]. Dor proposed an anterior 180-degree fundoplication, while Guarner used a posterior partial fundoplication with closure of the hiatus.
Studies comparing Lortat-Jacob [23], Toupet, and Nissen procedures proved that isolated restoration of the cardioesophageal angle has inferior outcomes as compared to a fundoplication [33–35]. History showed that correction of a single natural antireflux mechanism is not enough.
Some authors have performed a Nissen fundoplication without a hiatoplasty, neglecting the diaphragm as an antireflux mechanism. The results showed a large number of HH recurrences and consequently very poor control of reflux. This experience further strengthened the role of the diaphragm as an antireflux mechanism. In 1965 Nissen and Rossetti proposed a variation of the technique in overweight patients, using the anterior wall of the stomach to wrap the distal esophagus [27]. The follow-up of 590 cases showed 90% relief of symptoms [36, 37]. Other technical changes were made but were eventually abandoned such as the addition of pyloroplasty or vagotomy [38–42].