Contributors of Campbell-Walsh-Wein, 12th edition
Andrew J. Stephenson, Timothy D. Gilligan, Stephen Riggs, Kevin R. Rice, K. Clint Carey, Timothy A. Masterson, Richard S. Foster, Kris Gaston, Peter E. Clark, Christopher B. Anderson, James M. Mckiernan, Rene Sotelo, Luis G. Medina, Marcos Tobias Machado, Curtis A. Pettaway, Sr., Juanita M. Crook, and Lance C. Pagliaro
Testis cancer
Neoplasms of the testis comprise a morphologically and clinically diverse group of tumors, more than 95% of which are germ cell tumors (GCTs). GCTs are broadly categorized as seminoma and nonseminoma (NSGCT) because of differences in natural history and treatment. GCT is a relatively rare malignancy, accounting for 1%–2% of cancers among men in the United States. Currently, the long-term survival for men with metastatic GCT is 80%–90%. With the successful cure of patients, an important treatment objective is minimizing treatment-related toxicity without compromising curability ( Table 19.1 , Box 19.1 ).
Seminoma |
|
Spermatocytic tumor |
|
Embryonal carcinoma |
|
Choriocarcinoma |
|
Yolk sac tumor |
|
Teratoma |
|
Seminoma versus nonseminoma
- •
Compared with NSGCT, seminoma is associated with an indolent natural history with a lower incidence of metastatic disease and lower rates of occult retroperitoneal and distant metastases in patients with CS I and IIA-B, respectively.
- •
No poor-risk prognostic category exists for metastatic seminoma, and substantially more patients are classified as good risk by IGCCCG criteria compared with NSGCT.
- •
Seminoma is associated with increased sensitivity to radiation therapy and platin-based chemotherapy compared with NSGCT.
- •
Serum hCG is elevated in only 15% of patients with metastatic seminoma, and serum tumor marker levels are not used to guide treatment decisions.
- •
Teratoma at metastatic sites is less of a concern for seminoma compared with NSGCT but should be considered in patients who fail to respond to conventional therapy.
Epidemiology, etiology, and clinical presentation
In the United States, testis cancer is the most common malignancy among men aged 2–40 years and the second most common cancer after leukemia among young men aged 15–19 years. The incidence rate rises rapidly after puberty, peaking at ages 25–35 years. The incidence of bilateral GCT is approximately 2%. The majority of bilateral GCTs are metachronous and occur over an average interval of 5 years. Incidence of GCT is highest in whites and lowest in African Americans. A stage migration of GCT has been observed in several countries partially because of an increased awareness and earlier diagnosis.
There are five well-established risk factors for testis cancer:
- •
White race
- •
Cryptorchidism (four to six times more likely to be diagnosed with testis cancer, but relative risk falls to two to three if orchidopexy is performed before puberty)
- •
Family history of testis cancer
- •
Personal history of testis cancer
- •
Germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS)/intratubular germ cell neoplasia (ITGCN)
Physical examination.
The most common presentation of testis cancer is a painless testis mass. Regional or distant metastasis at diagnosis is present in approximately two-thirds of NSGCTs and 15% of pure seminomas, and symptoms related to metastatic disease are the presenting complaint in 10%–20% of patients. The physician should carefully examine the affected and the normal contralateral testis, noting their relative size and consistency and palpating for any testicular or extratesticular masses. The differential diagnosis of a testis mass includes epididymo-orchitis, torsion, hematoma, or paratesticular neoplasm (benign or malignant). In patients with a presumptive diagnosis of epididymo-orchitis, patients should be reevaluated within 2–4 weeks of completion of an appropriate course of oral antibiotics. A persistent mass or pain should be evaluated further.
Diagnostic testing.
In men with a testis mass, hydrocele, or unexplained scrotal symptoms or signs, bilateral scrotal ultrasonography should be considered an extension of the physical examination. Testis cancer is one of the few malignancies associated with serum tumor markers (lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], alpha-fetoprotein [AFP], and human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG]) that are essential in its diagnosis and management. Serum tumor marker levels should be obtained at diagnosis, after orchiectomy, to monitor for response to chemotherapy, and to monitor for relapse in patients on surveillance and after completion of therapy. Preorchiectomy serum tumor marker levels should not be used in management decisions ( Table 19.2 ).
Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) |
|
Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (bHCG) |
|
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) |
|
Initial treatment: Radical inguinal orchiectomy.
Patients suspected of having a testicular neoplasm should undergo a radical inguinal orchiectomy within 1–2 weeks of diagnosis with removal of the tumor-bearing testicle and spermatic cord to the level of the internal inguinal ring. A trans-scrotal orchiectomy or biopsy is contraindicated because it leaves the inguinal portion of the spermatic cord intact and may alter the lymphatic drainage of the testis, increasing the risk of local recurrence and pelvic or inguinal lymph node metastasis. In highly select patients, partial orchiectomy can be considered in cases in which the tumor is polar and measures 2 cm or smaller and in which the contralateral testicle is compromised or absent. For the rare patient with diffuse metastatic and/or symptomatic GCT requiring early initiation of systemic chemotherapy, diagnosis may be pursued via biopsy of a metastatic site or even made presumptively based on the clinical features and/or serologic studies. For such cases, a delayed radical orchiectomy is recommended for all patients regardless of response to therapy in the retroperitoneum.
Staging
The prognosis of GCT and initial management decisions are dictated by the clinical stage of the disease, which is based on the histopathological findings and pathological stage of the primary tumor, postorchiectomy serum tumor marker levels, and the presence and extent of metastatic disease as determined by physical examination and staging imaging studies, classified using the Tumor, Node, Metastases (TNM) system ( Table 19.3 ).
Primary Tumor (T) a | ||||
The extent of primary tumor is usually classified after radical orchiectomy and, for this reason, a pathological stage is assigned. | ||||
pTx | Primary tumor cannot be assessed | |||
pT0 | No evidence of primary tumor (e.g., histologic scar in testis) | |||
pTis | Intratubular germ cell neoplasia (carcinoma in situ) | |||
pT1 | Tumor limited to testis and epididymis without vascular/lymphatic invasion; tumor may invade into tunica albuginea but not tunica vaginalis | |||
pT2 | Tumor limited to testis and epididymis with vascular/lymphatic invasion or tumor extending through tunica albuginea with involvement of tunica vaginalis | |||
pT3 | Tumor invades spermatic cord with or without vascular/lymphatic invasion | |||
pT4 | Tumor invades scrotum with or without vascular/lymphatic invasion | |||
Regional Lymph Nodes (N) | ||||
Clinical (as Determined by Noninvasive Staging) | ||||
NX | Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed | |||
N0 | No regional lymph node metastasis | |||
N1 | Metastasis with lymph node mass ≤2 cm in greatest dimension or multiple lymph nodes, none more than 2 cm in greatest dimension | |||
N2 | Metastasis with lymph node mass, >2 cm but not more than 5 cm in greatest dimension or multiple lymph nodes, any one mass >2 cm but not more than 5 cm in greatest dimension | |||
N3 | Metastasis with lymph node mass >5 cm in greatest dimension | |||
Pathologic (pN) (as Determined by Pathologic Findings of RPLND Without Prior Chemotherapy or Radiotherapy) | ||||
pNX | Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed | |||
pN0 | No regional lymph node metastasis | |||
pN1 | Metastasis with lymph node mass ≤2 cm in greatest dimension and ≤5 nodes positive, none more than 2 cm in greatest dimension | |||
pN2 | Metastasis with lymph node mass >2 cm but not more than 5 cm in greatest dimension; or >5 nodes positive, none more than 5 cm; or evidence of extranodal extension of tumor | |||
pN3 | Metastasis with lymph node mass >5 cm in greatest dimension | |||
Distant Metastasis (M) | ||||
MX | Distant metastasis cannot be assessed | |||
M0 | No distant metastasis | |||
M1 | Distant metastasis | |||
M1a | Nonregional nodal or pulmonary metastasis | |||
M1b | Distant metastasis at site other than nonregional lymph nodes or lung | |||
Serum Tumor Markers (S) | ||||
SX | Marker studies unavailable or not performed | |||
S0 | Marker study levels within normal limits | |||
S1 | LDH <1.5 × N b and | |||
hCG (MIU/mL) <5000 and | ||||
AFP (ng/mL) <1000 | ||||
S2 | LDH 1.5-10 × N or | |||
hCG (MIU/mL) 5000–50,000 or | ||||
AFP (ng/mL) 1000–10,000 | ||||
S3 | LDH >10 × N or | |||
hCG (MIU/mL) >50,000 or | ||||
AFP (ng/mL) >10,000 | ||||
Stage Grouping | ||||
GROUP | T | N | M | S (SERUM TUMOR MARKERS) |
Stage 0 | pTis | N0 | M0 | S0 |
Stage I | pT1-4 | N0 | M0 | SX |
Stage IA | pT1 | N0 | M0 | S0 |
Stage IB | pT2 | N0 | M0 | S0 |
pT3 | N0 | M0 | S0 | |
pT4 | N0 | M0 | S0 | |
Stage IS | Any pT/Tx | N0 | M0 | S1-3 |
Stage II | Any pT/Tx | N1-3 | M0 | SX |
Stage IIA | Any pT/Tx | N1 | M0 | S0 |
Any pT/Tx | N1 | M0 | S1 | |
Stage IIB | Any pT/Tx | N2 | M0 | S0 |
Any pT/Tx | N2 | M0 | S1 | |
Stage IIC | Any pT/Tx | N3 | M0 | S0 |
Any pT/Tx | N3 | M0 | S1 | |
Stage III | Any pT/Tx | Any N | M1 | SX |
Stage IIIA | Any pT/Tx | Any N | M1a | S0 |
Any pT/Tx | Any N | M1a | S1 | |
Stage IIIB | Any pT/Tx | N1-3 | M0 | S2 |
Any pT/Tx | Any N | M1a | S2 | |
Stage IIIC | Any pT/Tx | N1-3 | M0 | S3 |
Any pT/Tx | Any N | M1a | S3 | |
Any pT/Tx | Any N | M1b | Any S |
a Except for pTis and pT4, extent of primary tumor is classified by radical orchiectomy. Treatment may be used for other categories in the absence of radical orchiectomy.
Management of nonseminoma germ cell tumor (NSGCT)
Clinical stage (CS) I.
The long-term survival associated with surveillance, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), and primary chemotherapy approaches 100%, thus any intervention after orchiectomy, represents overtreatment for the 70%–80% of patients with disease limited to the testis. The most common risk factors for occult metastasis are lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and a predominant component of embryonal carcinoma (EC). In the absence of these two risk factors, the risk of occult metastasis is less than 20%.
Surveillance – Surveillance offers the potential of reducing treatment-related toxicity by restricting treatment to those with a proven need for it. More than 90% of relapses occur within the first 2 years, but late relapses (>5 years) are seen in up to 1% of patients.
Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection – The rationale for RPLND for CS I NSGCT is based on several factors:
- •
The retroperitoneum is the most common site of occult metastatic disease and the risk of associated systemic disease is low
- •
15%–25% incidence of retroperitoneal teratoma (which is resistant to chemotherapy) is seen in those with occult metastasis
- •
Low risk of abdominal-pelvic recurrence after full, bilateral template RPLND, thereby obviating the need for routine surveillance computed tomography (CT) imaging
- •
High cure rates after RPLND alone for patients with low-volume (pN1) retroperitoneal malignancy and teratoma (pN1-3)
- •
Avoidance of chemotherapy in more than 75% of patients if adjuvant chemotherapy is restricted to those with extensive retroperitoneal malignancy (pN2-3)
- •
High salvage rate of relapses with good-risk, induction chemotherapy
- •
Low short- and long-term morbidity when a nerve-sparing RPLND is performed by experienced surgeons ( Figs. 19.1 and 19.2 )
- •
Primary Chemotherapy – Bleomycin, etoposide, Platin (BEP) for 1 cycle, is associated with the lowest risk of relapse, but these relapses are less amenable to salvage therapy because they are chemo-resistant. In contrast, patients who relapse after RPLND or on surveillance are chemotherapy naïve and are cured with chemotherapy in virtually all cases.
Clinical stage IS.
There is consensus that these patients should be treated similar to those with CS IIC-III and receive induction chemotherapy .
Clinical stage IIA and IIB.
The optimal management of CS IIA-B NSGCT is controversial. RPLND (with or without adjuvant chemotherapy) and induction chemotherapy (with or without postchemotherapy RPLND) are accepted treatment options with survival rates exceeding 95%. Thus there is consensus that CS IIA-B NSGCT patients with elevated tumor markers or bulky lymph nodes (>3 cm) should receive induction chemotherapy, while RPLND is preferred as initial therapy in those patients at risk for retroperitoneal teratoma who are at otherwise low risk for systemic disease (normal serum tumor markers, lymphadenopathy <3 cm).
Clinical stage IIC and III.
Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin-based regimens (BEP×3 or EP×4) is the initial approach used for the treatment of CS IIC and III NSGCT, based on risk stratification ( Table 19.4 ).