and Celena Scheede-Bergdahl3
(1)
Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
(2)
Department of Anesthesia, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
(3)
Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill Nutrition and Performance Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
Keywords
PrehabilitationSurgical prehabilitationPreoperative risk evaluationMedical optimization before surgeryPulmonary care before surgeryCardiac care before surgeryMedical Optimization
Preoperative medical optimization goes beyond simple preoperative risk assessment and aims to improve surgical outcomes. A concept critical to successful preoperative medical optimization is to target patients with preexisting physiologic compromise in whom physiologic reserves can be improved to better withstand the planned surgical intervention. In contrast, a healthy non-compromised patient has relatively less to gain from preoperative medical optimization efforts. This chapter provides specific, practical recommendations to optimize postoperative outcomes by focusing on the optimizing pulmonary status, cardiac disease, medication management, glucose control, frailty, and prehabilitation (Table 3.1).
Table 3.1.
Preoperative medical optimization and prehabilitation—overview.
Pulmonary • Inspiratory pulmonary training • Smoking cessation |
Medication management • Anticoagulation |
Cardiac • Beta-blockers |
Diabetes • Glucose management |
Geriatric assessment • Assess frailty |
Prehabilitation |
Pulmonary Interventions
Inspiratory Pulmonary Training
Inspiratory muscle training using incentive spirometry breathing exercises preoperatively reduces postoperative pulmonary complications. An example of a preoperative inspiratory muscle training regimen is training patients to perform 20 min daily of incentive spirometry breathing exercises for at least 2 weeks prior to an operation. Following cardiac operations, this protocol can reduce both serious pulmonary complications and pneumonia by 50 %.
Smoking Cessation
Stopping smoking can reduce postoperative complications. Numerous studies have found that smoking cessation can reduce postoperative complications, and particularly pulmonary complications, by more than 40 %. Evidence suggests that at least 4 weeks of no smoking is required to allow the postoperative benefits of smoking cessation; this fact may require delay in elective scheduling of an operation.
Cardiac Interventions
The literature regarding beta-blockade for reduction of postoperative myocardial ischemia is mixed and sometimes contradictory. The potential benefit of perioperative beta-blockade when used in high-risk patients is a reduction of postoperative ischemia, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death in high-risk patients. However, perioperative beta-blockade has been found in some studies to increase the risk of stroke and even death, particularly in beta-blocker naïve patients. Strong evidence exists both to continue beta-blockers in the perioperative period in patients who are chronically on beta-blockers and to prescribe beta-blockers for high-risk patients with coronary artery disease who are undergoing high-risk operations (e.g., major vascular operations).
Medication Management
Anticoagulation Management
Managing anticoagulants in the perioperative setting is becoming increasingly commonplace. The decision regarding anticoagulation around an elective operation balances the risk of thromboembolism against the risk of bleeding. In patients with a high risk of thromboembolism (e.g., mechanical heart valve, venous thromboembolism within 3 months, high-risk atrial fibrillation), bridging of oral warfarin anticoagulation with shorter lasting low-molecular-weight heparin injections is recommended. An evidence-based regimen for bridging therapy is described in Table 3.2. In patients with low risk of thromboembolism (e.g., bileaflet valve without risk factors, venous thromboembolism more than 12 months previously, low-risk atrial fibrillation), no bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin is recommended. In these low-risk cases, warfarin should be stopped 5 days prior to the planned operation and started 12–24 h postoperatively.
Table 3.2.
Bridging warfarin anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin—an evidence-based approach.
Preoperative | |
5 days pre-op | Stop warfarin 5 days |
3 days pre-op | Begin subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin 1 mg/kg Q12 h or dalteparin 200 IU/kg Q24 h) |
24 h pre-op | Discontinue LMWH injections Administer approximately ½ total daily dose for the last dose |
Postoperative | |
Post-op LMWH resumption | Low-risk bleeding—24 h post-op High-risk bleeding—48–72 h post-op |
12–24 h post-op | Resume warfarin |
Lab testing | Check INR at 5–7 days |
Target specific oral anticoagulants are a new class of oral anticoagulants. These medications are cleared by the kidneys. With normal renal function, the medications rivaroxaban and dabigatran should be stopped 24 h prior to a standard bleeding risk operation and 48–72 h prior to a high-risk bleeding operation.
Antiplatelet drugs represent a common dilemma in perioperative care. In general for low-bleeding-risk operations, antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel can be continued throughout the perioperative setting. For high-risk bleeding operations, aspirin should be stopped 5 days prior to the procedure for low-cardiovascular-risk patient and are recommended to be continued throughout the perioperative period in patients with high risk of an adverse cardiovascular event. And finally, clopidogrel should be stopped 5 days prior to major operations. If patient are at high risk of an adverse cardiovascular event, bridging therapy with short-acting GPIIb/IIIa antagonists may be considered.
Glucose Management
Patients with diabetes are at higher risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality. For diabetics, operations should be scheduled early in the morning to avoid prolonged periods of starvation. Additionally, patients with poorly controlled glucose or end-organ dysfunction related to diabetes should be recognized as high risk and optimal glucose control should be achieved preoperatively. While hyperglycemia is associated with development of complications, it is not yet clear which level of glycemia should be targeted to improve postoperative outcomes.
Frailty Evaluation
Older adults have increased surgical risk due to globally reduced physiologic reserves, a phenomenon termed frailty. Frailty by definition confers increased risk of adverse healthcare events including disability. The presence of frailty independently predicts adverse surgical outcomes including complications, need for discharge institutionalization, and mortality.
The measurement of frailty is completed by simple clinical tests that quantify the various domains, or characteristics, which make up the frail older adult. Frailty characteristics include impaired cognition, functional dependence, poor mobility, undernutrition, high comorbidity burden, and geriatric syndromes. A person is determined to be frail by summing the number of abnormal frailty characteristics present preoperatively. Frail older adults will have an accumulation of a higher number of abnormal frailty characteristics than the non-frail older adult. Clinical characteristics of frailty and simple clinical tools to measure these characteristics can be found in Table 3.3. Finding frailty in an older adult prior to an operation may be an indication for interventions such as prehabilitation.
Table 3.3.
Characteristics of the frail older adult.
Frailty characteristic | Clinical measurement tool (abnormal score) |
---|---|
Impaired cognition | Mini-Cog Test (≤3) Mini-Mental Status Exam (≤24) |
Functional dependence | Katz Activity of Daily Living Test (one or more dependent ADLs) Instrumental Activity of Daily Living Test (one or more dependent iADLs) |
Poor mobility | Time Up-and-Go Test (≥15 s) 5 m walking speed (≥6 s) |
Undernutrition | ≥10 lb weight loss in past year Hypoalbuminemia (<3.4 g/dL) |
High comorbidity burden | Charlson Index (≥3) Cumulative Illness Rating Score (≥3) |
Geriatric syndromes | Unintentional fall in past 6-months (≥1 fall) Presence of a pressure ulcer |
Prehabilitation
Impact of Surgery on Physical and Emotional Functions
Despite advances in surgical techniques, anesthetic pharmacology, and perioperative care, which have made even major operations safe and accessible to a variety of patients potentially at risk, there remains a group of patients who have suboptimal recovery. Almost 30 % of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery have postoperative complications, and, even in the absence of morbid events, major surgery is associated with 40 % reduction in functional capacity. Patients experience physical fatigue, disturbed sleep, and a decreased capacity to mentally concentrate for up to 9 weeks once they return home from surgery. Long periods of physical inactivity induce loss of muscle mass, deconditioning, pulmonary complications, and decubitus. Preoperative health status, functional capacity and muscle strength, and anxiety and depression correlate with postoperative fatigue, medical complications, and postoperative cognitive disturbances, and this is particularly true in the elderly, persons with cancer, and persons with limited physiological and mental reserve who are the most susceptible to the negative effects of surgery.
< div class='tao-gold-member'>
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register a > to continue