Mast Cells and Interstitial Cystitis




© Springer International Publishing AG 2018
Philip M. Hanno, Jørgen Nordling, David R. Staskin, Alan J. Wein and Jean Jacques Wyndaele (eds.)Bladder Pain Syndrome – An Evolutionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61449-6_9


9. Mast Cells and Interstitial Cystitis



Frank Aldenborg1, Magnus Fall  and Lennart Enerbäck1


(1)
Department of Pathology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, SE-41345 Göteborg, Sweden

(2)
Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, SE-41345 Göteborg, Sweden

 



 

Magnus Fall



Mast cells (MC) are tissue-resident immune cells that participate in first line host defense, responding to allergic challenge and pathogen attacks. Following appropriate stimulation they release immuno-modulators, and vaso- and neuroactive compounds. Early reports suggest that MCs are innervated [1] and their anatomical proximity to vasculature and nerve fibers underpin the likelihood of functioning neuro-immune interfaces. The biological role of MCs is diversified.

MCs have been in the focus of interstitial cystitis research for a long time and it has been repeatedly suggested that histo-pathologic demonstration of MC hyperplasia represents a momentous diagnostic tool. In the 80-ties the critical number of 28 MCs/mm2 was by many suggested as the proof of the diagnosis [2, 3]. It has to be remembered, though, that MC counts in the specimen of bladder mucosa and detrusor muscle does not disclose the absolute number of cells residing in the biopsy. Certainly, the degree of MC expansion is determinative but laboratory techniques have a considerable impact as to numbers, too. During the last decades, there has been a significant development of technologies resulting in increasing accuracy of MC demonstration. Naphtolesterase staining [2] was replaced by the more sensitive toluidine blue staining, reinforced by more appropriate fixation techniques to overcome blocking of dye-binding [4, 5]. Currently, immunohistochemical tryptase labeling has been found superior and more robust comparing to earlier methods [6, 7] and is the method recommended today [8].


9.1 What Did We Get Right?


The dramatic increase of MC counts in classic IC [5, 7], (ESSIC type 3) [9] compared to non-Hunner subjects and controls emphasize the fundamental difference between phenotypes with and without Hunner lesions.


9.2 What Seminal Publications Changed Our Thinking?


Certainly, MCs is one of the key players in classic IC/BPS (ESSIC 3C) and the reports from the 80-ties directed an attention to these cells [2, 3], an important attention. The rare finding in human biology of transepithelial MC migration demonstrated in classic IC [5, 7], with connection to the IgE system, among other things indicated that an allergic response could come into question but if so, what is the agent? The etiology and pathogenesis of BPS/IC is still not resolved and MCs may hold one of the keys.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jan 29, 2018 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on Mast Cells and Interstitial Cystitis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access