TESA
Mapping
TESE
Micro TESE
Sperm retrieval rate (%)
49.5
47
45
62
Advantages
Simple
Can be repeated
Less cost
Simple
Gives a guide to subsequent biopsy
No microsurgical skills
Less cost
High surgical sperm retrieval rate (SSRR)
Lower incidence of hematoma
Lower incidence of postoperative testicular atrophy
Disadvantages
Lower SSRR
Multiple punctures may increase incidence of hematoma
Sperm found are not cryopreserved.
Lower SSRR than microTESE
Higher incidence of hematoma and fibrosis
Higher incidence of postoperative testicular atrophy
Higher risk of decreased androgen production
Higher cost
Requires microsurgical skills
Further management of NOA cases—In cases where the patients decide not to go for SSR or with failure to find sperm during SSR, the patients are left with few choices for fertility. The first choice would be intrauterine insemination or ICSI using donor sperm. The other choice would be adoption.
Future management of NOA—Stem cell therapy for male infertility is still in the very early investigational steps. We believe that in the near future there would be a solution to the fertility problem for most NOA cases using stem cells.
Case Scenario 2
Mr. M is a 34-year-old gentleman, married for 7 years, and has one child who is 5-years old. He and his wife have been trying to have a child for the past 3 years. The wife consulted a gynecologist who confirmed that she had no cause for infertility. He ordered a semen test for Mr. M and the result came as absence of sperm in the whole sample. He was referred to an urologist who diagnosed him as a case of obstructive azoospermia after proper evaluation.
Clues Toward Obstructive Azoospermia
History and Medical Examination
History of infection—whether urinary tract infection, prostatitis, epididymitis, or sexually transmitted diseases—may evoke the possibility of OA whether on epididymal or ejaculatory duct level. Tuberculosis can cause seminal tract obstruction at different levels. Therefore, a history of tuberculosis, especially genitourinary, may be a major clue toward diagnosis of OA. In filarial endemic areas, history of filariasis could be the cause of obstruction. Similarly, history of schistosomiasis should be asked, especially in endemic areas.
Trauma to inguinal or scrotal areas may lead to OA, especially, if penetrating and is complicated by infection. Surgical history must include history of vasectomy, as well as other inguinal or scrotal surgeries, such as hernia repair or hydrocelectomy, which may raise the possibility of iatrogenic obstruction especially if performed bilaterally.
Presence of other manifestations of cystic fibrosis, such as recurrent respiratory tract infections or family history of similar condition will aid the diagnosis of congenital OA [2, 11, 84].
Low ejaculate volume is often seen in patients with ejaculatory duct obstruction and may be the main presenting symptom together with painful ejaculation or hematospermia [84].
Clinical examination plays a very important role in diagnosis of OA. These patients will have normal virilization with well-developed secondary sexual characteristics. Abdominal examination may show an inguinal scar of prior surgery. Usually a well-trained urologist will be able to diagnose OA on local genital examination. The presence of normal size testis together with fully engorged epididymis will confirm the diagnosis. Epididymal nodule can be palpated on the tail of the epididymis in cases with previous history of STD. Usually, the vas deferens can be easily palpated during examination as a unique cordlike tubular structure. Unilateral or bilateral absence of vas, which may be associated with partial absence of the epididymis, will confirm the diagnosis of congenital vassal aplasia. Other abnormalities on vassal examination may include: beaded vas in case of tuberculosis, thickened vas in case of schistosomiasis, and a vassal defect with or without granuloma in post vasectomy cases [84–87].
Investigations
Seminal analysis—Normal semen volume can be present in cases of epididymal or vassal obstruction but in these cases the fructose in semen is positive. Presence of low semen volume attracts our attention to the possibility of EDO. In these cases, the seminal fluid analysis will also show acidic pH and negative or low fructose due to absence of seminal vesicles secretions [17]. Azoospermia is usually present; however, severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia may be seen in cases with partial EDO.
Hormonal analysis—These patients will essentially have normal testosterone and gonadotropins levels. Occasionally high normal FSH may be seen on OA patients, which may be due to testicular affection secondary to prolonged obstruction. These cases usually carry poor prognosis following reconstruction surgeries [17, 30].
Genetic test—In cases of bilateral absence of vas, CFTR gene mutation must be done for both the man and woman, especially if they are relatives [17, 85].
Radiological—In cases of OA, radiological diagnosis is used to confirm the diagnosis of EDO and if possible detect the level of obstruction. This can be done through one of the following:
TRUS—Signs of EDO include presence of midline prostatic cyst, dilated ejaculatory duct or vassal ampulla together with post-obstruction dilation of seminal vesicles (>1.5 cm in width). Presence of prostatic calcifications at the site of ejaculatory ducts can be helpful in diagnosis. It may be difficult to diagnosis cases of fibrotic stricture of ejaculatory duct by TRUS as seminal vesicles may be also affected eliminating the signs of EDO. However, TRUS has low specificity in EDO diagnosis as it is operator-dependent.
In cases of BAVD, TRUS may show small atrophic or complete absence of one or both seminal vesicles [88, 89].
TRUS-guided seminal vesiculography is a useful diagnostic tool for EDO. It can confirm the diagnosis in both anatomical as well as dynamic ways. Under TRUS guidance, a 22 G needle is advanced into the seminal vesicle and, after its position is confirmed with aspiration, contrast medium is injected. The presence of sperms in the seminal vesicle aspirate, together with failure of contrast reaching the bladder, will confirm the diagnosis. Sperm found in the aspirate can be cryopreserved for future use in IVF. The major drawback of this procedure is its invasive nature with possibility of injury to pelvic organs and bleeding [90–92].
MRI—Superior to TRUS in delineating the anatomy of the prostate and distal seminal tract (vassal ampulla, seminal vesicles, and ejaculatory ducts) due to its high soft tissue contrast and multiplanar capability. An MR image serves as a “detailed map” for guiding interventional diagnostic or corrective procedures as it clearly demonstrates the level of obstruction. However, it is expensive and needs a skillful radiologist for proper interpretation of images [93–95].
Abdominal/Pelvic ultrasound may be needed in cases of unilateral absence of vas deferens to detect ipsilateral absence of kidney [85].
Management of Obstructive Azoospermia
The treatment of OA aims either to achieve pregnancy through intercourse following surgical correction or through ICSI using sperms retrieved from the epididymis or testis.
Counseling
The patients should be properly counseled about both options of treatment. The decision is multifactorial and includes whether the couple has primary or secondary infertility, desired number of children, and history of previous surgery that can affect the success rate of microsurgical reconstruction; e.g., redo-surgery and inguinal obstruction of the vas during hernia repair or vassal or epididymal injury during hydrocelectomy. Proper evaluation of the female partner is also very important in decision-making, especially if her age is above 35 and her chances of achieving normal pregnancy is low, as well as the time needed for surgical reconstruction to function can extend up to 1 year [96]. The financial background of the couple is one of the detrimental factors, as cost-effective analysis has proved reconstruction to be the most effective for a patient with epididymal or post vasectomy obstruction [97]. Risk associated with ICSI such as ovarian hyperstimulation, multiple gestations, and congenital anomalies must be discussed with the couple [98–100].
Surgical Correction of Obstructive Azoospermia
Vasal Obstruction—Vasectomy is one of the most common procedures done for male sterilization and around 10% of these will ask later for reversal. The success rate of microsurgical reconstruction vasovasostomy (VV) reported more than 90% patency with pregnancy rates from 40 to 90%. The time since vasectomy is inversely proportional to a successful surgery [101]. Presence of sperm granuloma, quality of the proximal vassal fluid intraoperatively, length of the proximal vasal stump, and the microsurgical experience are main factors affecting outcomes of microsurgical VV. The techniques utilized for microsurgical VV are two layers anastomosis. However, a few modifications of the standard technique, such as posterior full-thickness sutures, have been added with comparable outcomes to the two layers technique. The patient will be requested to do the seminal fluid analysis in 1 month postoperatively.
Epididymal Obstruction—Microsurgical reconstruction of epididymal obstruction, vasoepididymostomy (VE), success rate has reported 30–70% patency rates and pregnancy rates of 20–50%. The most important predictor of success is the microsurgical experience and the level of epididymal obstruction, with the obstruction at the tail and lower body having the best chances of positive outcomes compared to obstruction at the head with smaller tubules and more difficult anastomosis. The most common technique used now for VE is the end-to-side intussusception technique. Being very delicate anastomosis, the patient will be requested to repeat the seminal fluid analysis in 6 months time and it may take up to 1 year for the anastomosis to function.
In case the couple opted to go for surgical correction it is always advised to have sperms cryopreserved for possible use in the future, if pregnancy was not achieved after successful surgery or failed ones.
Ejaculatory duct obstruction—Surgical correction of ejaculatory duct obstruction is through transurethral resection of ejaculatory ducts (TURED), usually accompanied with vasography as diagnostic and confirmation of the patency following resection of the ejaculatory duct. In up to 75% of cases, sperms will return to the ejaculate and in 25% can achieve normal pregnancy. These patients should be informed that complication rates can reach up to 20% and varies from transient as hematuria, hematospermia, or chronic due to reflux of urine leading to epididymitis with chances of secondary epididymal obstruction or watery ejaculate.
Surgical Sperm Retrieval
Sperm retrieval for OA is done either during surgical correction for possible future use or primarily if the patient opted to go for ICSI. Methods used for sperm retrieval are listed in Table 8.2.
Table 8.2
Methods used for sperm retrieval in OA
Source | Procedure |
---|---|
Epididymal | MESA (microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration) PESA (percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration) |
Testicular | TESA (percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration) TESE (testicular sperm extraction) |
References
1.
Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol. 1989;142:62.PubMed
2.
Jarvi K, Lo K, Fischer A, Grantmyre J, Zini A, Chow V, Mak V. CUA guideline: the workup of azoospermic males. Can Urol Assoc J. 2010;4(3):163–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
McDonald RA, Mallory GK. Hemochromatosis and hemosiderosis: study of 211 autopsied cases. Arch Intern Med. 1970;105:686–700.CrossRef
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Male Infertility Best Practice Policy Committee of the American Urological Association; Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Report on evaluation of the azoospermic male. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(Suppl 1):S210–5.
9.
Esteves S. Clinical management of infertile men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:459–70.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Sofikitis NV, Miyagawa I, Incze P, Andrighetti S. Detrimental effect of left varicocele on the reproductive capacity of the early haploid male gamete. J Urol. 1996;156:267–70.
11.
12.
Wosnitzer M, Goldstein M, Hardy MP. Review of azoospermia. Spermatogenesis. 2014;4:e28218.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
14.
15.
Matsumiya K, Namiki M, Takahara S, et al. Clinical study of azoospermia. Int J Androl. 1994;17:140–2.CrossRefPubMed