Laser Treatment of Benign Prostatic Disease





Introduction


Basics of Laser Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia


Laser technology was first implemented to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in 1986. The acronym “laser” stands for “Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation.” Laser is a light that is emitted from an energized laser material such as a semiconductor, crystal, gas, or dye. Light is absorbed by tissue and is converted into thermal energy. This conversion results in either coagulation or vaporization of the tissue. Coagulation occurs when the tissue is heated below the boiling temperature and above that required to denature proteins, resulting in a coagulative necrosis. Vaporization occurs when the tissue is heated above the boiling temperature using higher density energy. Tissue absorbs light via a chromophobe such as water and hemoglobin. The absorption coefficient between the laser and tissue and the depth of penetration into tissue also impact its effects.


Techniques of Surgical Laser Removal of Prostatic Tissue


Lasers can remove BPH tissue by vaporization, enucleation, coagulation, and resection techniques. Please refer to Table 68.1 for a summary of the various types of lasers, their characteristics, and how they are used. This chapter focuses on the two most common techniques used to remove obstructive prostate tissue and the laser used to perform these techniques: photovaporization of the prostate (PVP) with the potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP), also known as the greenlight laser and laser enucleation of the prostate with the holmium laser, respectively. It should be noted here that the thulium laser is also used to perform laser enucleation of the prostate, albeit to a lesser extent than the holmium laser. Lasers are rarely used to perform coagulation or resection today. In brief, laser coagulation of the prostate results in a coagulative necrosis of the prostatic urethra and adjacent inner prostatic tissue, which sloughs away at 4 to 8 weeks postoperatively. This procedure results in prolonged irritative voiding symptoms and urinary retention postoperatively, which can last for weeks to months. As a result, it is rarely performed. Laser resection is performed by incising pieces from the prostate, letting the chips fall into the bladder and evacuating them at the end of the procedure in a similar manner to traditional transurethral resection of the prostate with an electrocautery loop. Laser resection has largely been replaced by enucleation.



TABLE 68.1

LASER TYPES AND CHARACTERISTICS




















































Laser Type Wavelength (nm) Chromophobe Depth of Penetration (mm) Mode Proximity to Tissue Technique
Holmium (Ho:YAG) 2140 Water 0.4 Pulsed Contact Enucleation, vaporization, and resection
Greenlight, KTP/LBO (YAG) 532 Hemoglobin 0.8 Quasi-continuous Contact and noncontact versions Vaporization
Neodymium (YAG) 1064 Water and hemoglobin 10 Pulsed or continuous Noncontact Coagulation
Thulium (YAG) 2000 Water 0.25 Continuous Contact and noncontact Vaporization, enucleation, and resection
Diode 940, 980, 1318, and 1470 Water and hemoglobin 0.5–5 Pulsed or continuous Contact Vaporization and enucleation

KTP, Potassium titanyl phosphate; LBO, lithium-triborate; YAG, yttrium aluminum garnet.


The holmium yttrium aluminum garnet (Ho:YAG) laser produces energy at a wavelength of 2140 nm and has a penetration depth of 0.4 mm into prostatic tissue. It results in vaporization without deep coagulation; however, dissipating heat causes coagulation of small and medium vessels 2 to 3 mm deep, leading to excellent hemostasis. The Ho:YAG laser is excellent for vaporization and precise incision and enucleation. The holmium laser is frequently used to perform transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) to treat bladder neck obstruction. This technique is described later in this chapter.


The potassium titanyl phosphate YAG (KTP:YAG) laser is derived from the Nd:YAG laser. The Nd:YAG laser is passed through a KTP or lithium-triborate (LBO) crystal, resulting in half of its wavelength (532 nm) and doubling of its frequency. The KTP:YAG laser is absorbed by hemoglobin. The penetration depth is 0.8 mm. This laser is best used for vaporization of tissue, although there are some reports of it being using for enucleation. Initially studied in 1998, the first greenlight laser was a 60-W KTP laser and was criticized for inefficient vaporization. The 80-W greenlight laser was created in 2002. To further improve vaporization efficiency, the 120-W “high-performance system” (HPS) fiber was released in 2006. A LBO crystal was added to this HPS fiber. Further research led to the development of an even higher power laser, the 180-W “xcelerated performance system” (XPS), and laser fiber known as the MoXy fiber. It vaporizes tissue faster with a 50% increase in beam area. The Moxy fiber is a side-firing laser with 70 degrees of forward deflection (see Fig. 68.12 ).


Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate


Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is the endourologic procedure for BPH treatment that most closely approximates open simple prostatectomy. The cutting characteristics of the holmium laser are used to develop a plane between the prostatic adenoma and the surgical capsule of the prostate. The enucleated tissue is removed through a process of morcellation. Randomized controlled clinical trials have shown advantages of HoLEP to be reduced catheterization times, length of hospitalization, and blood loss. The hemostatic nature of the holmium laser has also allowed HoLEP to be performed on patients taking antithrombotic therapy. Although HoLEP can be used effectively to treat prostates of any size, it is particularly advantageous for the treatment of large prostate, providing a minimally invasive alternative to open simple prostatectomy. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated outcomes of HoLEP to be equivalent to that of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and simple open prostatectomy. Bladder stones, a common pathology found with BPH, can be treated with the same holmium laser fiber used to perform laser enucleation.


Potassium Titanyl Phosphate Photovaporization of the Prostate


Photovaporization of the prostate with the KTP laser results in vaporization of prostatic tissue. Vaporization has the advantage of not having to remove prostatic tissue from the bladder by morcellation, open cystotomy, or evacuation through the endoscope as is needed for enucleation and resection techniques. The disadvantage is there is no tissue that can be sent for pathologic evaluation. This procedure can be performed on an outpatient basis. In randomized studies, PVP with the KTP laser has been found to have similar outcomes as TURP with less postoperative morbidity. PVP achieves excellent hemostasis and can also be performed on patients taking antithrombotic medications.




Preoperative Preparation and Planning


Before a patient undergoes laser treatment of BPH, it is imperative to determine that the patient is an appropriate candidate, with evidence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to bladder outlet obstruction from BPH. In 2010, the American Urological Association (AUA) provided specific guidelines for the management of men with BPH. If initial evaluation includes findings of an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) concerning for prostate cancer, hematuria, abnormal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, predominantly irritative LUTS or primarily bothered by nocturia, recurrent infections, palpable bladder, history or risk for urethral stricture, or neurologic issues, the patient should undergo additional testing as indicated before treating BPH. Additional testing, including a voiding diary, serum creatinine to assess renal function, urine culture, urine cytology, cystoscopy, and imaging studies to assess prostate size, as well as other pathology such as bladder stones and hydronephrosis, uroflowmetry, postvoid residual, or urodynamic testing should be performed as clinically indicated.


Management options for men with LUTS secondary to BPH include watchful waiting, medical therapy, indwelling Foley catheter, suprapubic tube, or clean intermittent catheterization for those with urinary retention and surgery. The AUA symptom index (AUASI) has seven symptom questions and one quality of life question. The AUASI is used to categorize men with BPH into groups based on severity of symptoms. Watchful waiting is preferred for the management of patients with mild symptoms (AUASI score <8) and patients with moderate or severe symptoms (AUASI score ≥8) who are not bothered by their LUTS and have not developed complications of BPH such as renal insufficiency, urinary retention, recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), or bladder stones.


Interventional therapy should be discussed for men with moderate (AUASI 8–19) or severe symptoms (AUASI >19) or significant bother with sufficient evidence of prostatic obstruction. Additional testing with uroflowmetry, postvoid residual, cystoscopy, urodynamics, or imaging of the bladder and kidneys can be performed as indicated to confirm prostatic obstruction. Options for interventional therapy include medical management; minimally invasive therapies such as transurethral needle ablation and transurethral microwave therapy; and surgical options, including transurethral modalities such as incision of the prostate, resection, coagulation, vaporization, and enucleation of the prostate, as well as more invasive options such as laparoscopic or robotic or open simple prostatectomy. Newer surgical interventions for BPH including prostatic urethral lift and prostatic artery embolization are also available but are lacking long-term data. Although many men may pursue surgical intervention only after medical therapy has failed, this is not a requirement because some men may wish to pursue definitive treatment if they are significantly bothered by their symptoms. AUA guidelines recommend surgery over medical therapy for patients with complications of BPH, including bladder stones, renal insufficiency, urinary retention, recurrent infections, or gross hematuria secondary to BPH.


If surgical intervention is elected, the choice of approach should be based on the patient’s presentation, anatomy, surgeon experience and comfort level with each technique, and a discussion of the risks and benefits of each. Although TUIP should only be offered to men with small (≤30 mL) prostates and simple prostatectomy should only be considered for men with large (≥80 mL) prostates, laser enucleation of the prostate can treat both large and small prostates. Laser vaporization of the prostate has also been used to treat prostates of all sizes, though a staged approach may be required for very large prostates. Imaging to assess the size of the prostate is helpful in determining the optimal treatment approach and estimating the duration of the procedure.


Risks of outlet procedures performed using laser technology should be discussed preoperatively. These include bleeding, need for transfusion, infection, retrograde ejaculation, persistent urinary symptoms, dysuria, urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, bladder neck contracture, urethral stricture, injury to the bladder or ureteral orifices, or injuries related to positioning. In the case of laser enucleation in which morcellated prostate tissue is sent for pathological analysis, the patient should also be counseled regarding the risk of finding incidental prostate cancer, which has been reported to be 5.7% to 11.7%. Additional risks of surgery not specific to transurethral prostate surgery include deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, pneumonia, and even death. Removal of obstructive prostatic tissue with lasers is always performed with normal saline, so men are not at risk for TUR (transurethral resection) syndrome (severe hyponatremia).


After the workup has been performed confirming bladder outlet obstruction secondary to BPH and the patient elects laser treatment, counseling on the postoperative course is necessary so expectations can be managed appropriately. For men electing to undergo greenlight vaporization of the prostate, most will generally go home on the day of surgery and return to the clinic within several days for a voiding trial if a catheter is placed at the end of the procedure. Many will experience irritative LUTS that should gradually improve.


Men undergoing HoLEP stay in the hospital overnight. A voiding trial may be performed on the first postoperative day based on clinical judgment. Some patients may experience mild stress incontinence in the early postoperative period and should be taught how to perform Kegel exercises. Men with very large prostates may require cystotomy or perineal urethrostomy to facilitate HoLEP, which should be discussed preoperatively, as well as the need for an indwelling catheter for 1 to 2 weeks if cystotomy or urethrostomy is performed.


Before surgery, a urine culture should be sent and the patient treated with culture specific antibiotics as indicated. The AUA Best Practice Policy Statement on Urologic Surgery Antimicrobial Prophylaxis (2008) recommends less than 24-hour antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing transurethral surgery on the prostate. Antibiotic prophylaxis should be extended beyond 24 hours if a catheter was present before the procedure, placed at the time of the procedure or for bacteriuria. Recommended antibiotic regimens by the AUA include but are not limited to fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin and ampicillin, first- or second-generation cephalosporins, or amoxicillin–clavulanate.


A basic metabolic panel, complete blood count to assess preoperative hematocrit and platelet count, an international normalized ratio and partial thromboplastin time to assess for coagulopathy, and type and screen should be sent before the procedure. If the patient is taking antithrombotic therapy, the timing and risks of stopping these medications in the perioperative period should be discussed with the patient and his medical provider. Although studies have shown that laser ablation and enucleation of the prostate can be performed safely while taking these medications, it is still preferable to stop antithrombotic therapy if it is medically safe.


Anesthetic Techniques


HoLEP and PVP can be done under general or spinal anesthesia. Aside from the inability to place the patient in the dorsal lithotomy position, the only other absolute contraindication to HoLEP is inability to clear the patient for surgery because of significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities and the increased risks of general anesthesia. PVP of the prostate can be performed safely under spinal anesthesia as well as general.




Patient Positioning


For transurethral surgery of the prostate, patients are placed in the dorsal lithotomy position. After anesthesia is administered, the patient is positioned on the operative table so that his buttocks are at the edge of the lower table break. Adequate padding should be placed under the sacrum because pressure to this area increases when the legs are placed in stirrups. The arms are generally secured on padded arm boards at an angle of less than 90 degrees. Tucking the arms at the patient’s side can put the fingers and hands at risk for injury from raising or lowering the lower portion of the bed or from the stirrups. The legs are elevated simultaneously when placing them in stirrups to avoid dislocation of the hips and rotational stress of the lumbar spine. The hips are flexed 80 to 100 degrees and abducted 30 to 45 degrees from the midline. A more exaggerated lithotomy position (flexion >90 degrees) is sometimes necessary to allow manipulation of the scope during the procedure. The weight of the leg should be placed on the foot or heel and not on the calf muscles. Prolonged pressure on the calf muscles can result in compartment syndrome of the lower leg. Additionally, pressure over the lateral portion of the knee should be avoided because compression of the common peroneal nerve, which runs over the fibula in this location, can result in a nerve palsy and foot drop.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jan 2, 2020 | Posted by in UROLOGY | Comments Off on Laser Treatment of Benign Prostatic Disease

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access