Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection with Transanal Anastomosis or Colonic J-Pouch Creation
W. Conan Mustain
Sharon L. Stein
INDICATIONS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
Chapter 14 reviewed the technique for multiport laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR). This chapter emphasizes techniques involving a very low rectal resection requiring creation of a coloanal anastomosis, defined as anastomosis between the colon and the surgical anal canal. The surgical anal canal is defined as the tissue between the top of the anorectal ring and the dentate line. Virtually all LARs involve a “transanal” anastomosis, typically a double-stapled colorectal anastomosis with a transanally introduced circular stapler. However, when constructing an anastomosis at the level of the surgical anal canal, particular consideration must be given to the method of rectal transection, the configuration of the colonic anastomosis, and the technique used to create the anastomosis. This chapter describes various transanal surgical techniques and colonic reservoirs that may be used in combination with laparoscopic proctectomy for preservation of intestinal continuity after resection of the distal rectum.
The most common indication for laparoscopic LAR with coloanal anastomosis is cancer of the distal rectum. Occasionally, benign conditions such as rectovaginal or rectourethral fistula, or technical complications such as staple misfiring may require the use of a coloanal anastomosis to avoid permanent colostomy. Standard treatment for rectal cancer invading beyond the submucosa is en bloc resection of the rectum and mesorectum with negative distal and radial margins. Improved understanding of tumor biology has led to a decreased emphasis on distal margin, from 5 to 1-2 cm, and an increased appreciation of the importance of the circumferential radial margin with regard to local recurrence. This understanding has enabled surgeons to preserve intestinal continuity in all but the most distal rectal cancers while achieving satisfactory oncologic outcomes. Resections of this nature require technical expertise and the ability to employ techniques beyond the conventional double-stapled, end-to-end colorectal anastomosis.
The primary reason to employ transanal techniques during LAR is the inability to transabdominally divide the rectum and the mesorectum. This limitation may be secondary to technical difficulties and/or oncologic considerations. Technically, the space in the pelvis is limited and the pelvis distally becomes more narrow (Fig. 15-1). As dissection continues deep in the pelvis, the angle of instrumentation becomes parallel to the rectum in the pelvis. When choosing to transect the mesorectum or rectum, the ideal angle for transection is perpendicular to the rectum. Limited space in the pelvis may render this difficult or impossible. Techniques to accommodate this include anterior-to-posterior stapling, as well as newer transanal total mesorectal techniques, which modify angles and address prior limitations.
In addition, clear oncologic margins are vital to a successful operation. When distal tumors abut or invade the upper aspects of the anorectal ring or internal sphincter, transanal resection of a portion of the internal sphincter may be required to obtain adequate radial margins while preserving bowel continuity. A hand-sewn anastomosis is typically required after mucosectomy or transsphincteric resection. It is generally accepted that a stapled anastomosis is preferable when possible, because of time, simplicity, and likely superior functional results. Studies have shown lower rates of anastomotic stricture and decreased seepage after stapled anastomosis when compared to hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis.
Regardless of the technique of anastomosis, the proximal colonic segment may be configured end to end, side to end, or may be fashioned into a reservoir by creation of a colonic J-pouch or a transverse coloplasty. Although the decision to transect the bowel transanally is most often dictated by the anatomy, the configuration of the proximal colonic segment is generally at the surgeon’s discretion. Inadequate colonic length, a bulky mesocolon, or a narrow pelvis may preclude creation of a colonic J-pouch. The colonic J-pouch can be constructed through a transabdominal incision, including the eventual loop ileostomy site, or through the anus. After any rectal resection, there is an expected alteration of bowel function because the colonic portion of the anastomosis lacks the compliance, contractility, and distensibility of the normal rectum. In some patients, this change may result in life-altering dysfunction because of frequent stools, urgency, seepage, or incontinence. When performing very low anastomoses, the creation of a colonic reservoir will improve compliance of the pre-anastomotic segment and lead to better functional results, particularly during the first year after surgery. Several randomized trials and meta-analyses support the notion that a colonic reservoir or “neorectum” leads to better early functional results than a straight end-to-end coloanal anastomosis.
Contraindications to LAR and laparoscopic surgery, in general, are described in previous chapters and are identical for laparoscopic proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis. Very distal rectal resections can be technically challenging regardless of the operative approach, and anatomic factors such as obesity, a narrow pelvis, prostatic hypertrophy, or prior pelvic surgery increase the degree of difficulty. When any or all of these factors are present, the surgeon must be realistic about the likelihood of completing the pelvic dissection safely with laparoscopy. When dealing with rectal cancer, a successful oncologic outcome takes priority over the short-term benefits of minimally invasive surgery. In some situations, a hybrid approach may be used, where the abdominal portion of the case is done laparoscopically and the pelvic portion through an infraumbilical midline or Pfannenstiel incision. Anecdotally, in the authors’ experience, the use of a transverse linear stapler, such as the PI 30-3.5 (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) or the CONTOUR curved cutter stapler (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc Cincinnati, OH), applied through a midline or Pfannenstiel incision with maximal upward pull on the rectum can gain an extra centimeter beyond that which can be laparoscopically achieved. That centimeter may mean the difference between a double-stapled or a hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis. The editor’s preference is to perform transanal total mesorectal excision (TATME) in these situations.
Consideration of preoperative sphincter function and continence is especially important when contemplating a very low anastomosis. Patients with poor baseline continence or severely impaired
mobility are poor candidates for a coloanal anastomosis and should be offered a permanent colostomy. Transient impairment due to a bulky tumor or as a side effect of neoadjuvant radiation is not as worrisome if the patient had normal continence before diagnosis and normal sphincters. Tumors invading the external sphincter or a significant amount of levator muscle are best treated by abdominoperineal resection (APR).
mobility are poor candidates for a coloanal anastomosis and should be offered a permanent colostomy. Transient impairment due to a bulky tumor or as a side effect of neoadjuvant radiation is not as worrisome if the patient had normal continence before diagnosis and normal sphincters. Tumors invading the external sphincter or a significant amount of levator muscle are best treated by abdominoperineal resection (APR).
PREOPERATIVE PLANNING
Before surgery, all patients should undergo appropriate staging for rectal neoplasia. Tumor depth, nodal involvement, and the presence of metastatic disease should be assessed. A pathologic diagnosis should be established by tumor biopsy and the proximal colon should be cleared by full colonoscopy whenever possible. Office-based digital rectal examination and rigid proctoscopy should be performed by the operating surgeon to evaluate tumor location, fixation, and sphincter function. Depth of tumor invasion and nodal status can be assessed using endorectal ultrasound (EUS) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The choice of examination should be based on institutional expertise. Early, mobile tumors may be better evaluated by EUS. In more advanced tumors, MRI provides greater detail on circumferential margins and involvement of adjacent structures. For cancers of the distal third of the rectum, preoperative chemoradiotherapy is indicated for T3 and T4 tumors with threatened circumferential margins. In addition, very distal tumors for which APR would otherwise be required may be treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation regardless of stage, in an effort to downsize the tumor and allow sphincter preservation. MRI has become the global preferred standard staging tool. Pretreatment MRI staging is a requirement of the Commission on Cancer National Accreditation Program for rectal cancer.
Metastatic evaluation includes contrasted computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level. Although not routinely indicated,18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) may be useful in the setting of a markedly elevated CEA without obvious metastatic disease on CT. The finding of stage IV disease is typically an indication for systemic chemotherapy before consideration of surgical treatment of the primary tumor. Exceptions to this may be bleeding from the tumor, and potentially obstruction, although a diverting stoma may be more appropriate than primary resection. All patients with rectal cancer should have all of the findings discussed in the multidisciplinary rectal cancer team conference.
The patient’s overall health and suitability for surgery should be assessed by a careful history and physical examination, routine laboratory work, and additional testing as indicated for specific comorbidities. A careful assessment of baseline continence should be established. Early symptoms of impaired continence including nighttime soilage or incontinence to flatus or liquid stool should be elicited and patients should be counseled that these symptoms will likely worsen after a coloanal anastomosis. Documentation of a Wexner/Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score should be performed. A thorough discussion of the risks, benefits, and expected outcomes of sphincter-preserving surgery versus APR should be held and documented in the patient chart. Patients should be informed of the need for a temporary diverting ileostomy as well as the possibility of a permanent colostomy should intraoperative findings differ from preoperative imaging. Patients should meet with a trained enterostomal therapist for counseling and marking for left- and right-sided stoma sites before surgical positioning.
Preoperative components of an established enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) should be initiated in the clinic with provision for patient education, specific instructions on preoperative fasting, and any preoperative prescriptions. Preoperative bowel preparation is controversial. Although data demonstrate that bowel cleansing may not be necessary in all colon surgery, bowel preparation avoids leaving a column of stool in the diverted colon. In addition, bowel cleansing provides the ability to perform intraoperative colonoscopy. The combination of mechanical and antibiotic bowel preparation has been shown to significantly reduce the rate of surgical site infection and other complications after colorectal surgery. The authors and editors routinely perform preoperative mechanical oral, cathartic, and antibiotic bowel preparation before LAR.
SURGERY
Essential equipment for successful laparoscopic LAR include a 5- or 10-mm 30-degree camera for adequate visualization in the deep pelvis, nontraumatic laparoscopic bowel graspers, laparoscopic scissors with electrocautery capability, a vessel-sealing energy device or endoscopic stapler for vessel
transection, and a suction irrigator. A self-retaining retractor such as the LoneStar retractor system (CooperSurgical, Inc., Trumbull, CT) and lighted Hill-Ferguson anal retractors facilitate perineal dissection.
transection, and a suction irrigator. A self-retaining retractor such as the LoneStar retractor system (CooperSurgical, Inc., Trumbull, CT) and lighted Hill-Ferguson anal retractors facilitate perineal dissection.
Prophylaxis and Positioning
In the preoperative holding area, patients are given chemical prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in the form of subcutaneous standard or low-molecular-weight heparin. Sequential compression devices and antiembolic stockings are applied before transfer to the operating table. Intravenous antibiotics with appropriate anaerobic and aerobic coverage are given within 30 minutes of skin incision and redosed at appropriate intervals throughout the operation.
The authors position patients in modified lithotomy position in padded stirrups, with both arms tucked at the sides. Care should be taken to ensure that the lower leg is well protected to prevent injury to the peroneal nerve. An electric operating table is lined with either a gel pad or beanbag to reduce the risk of pressure injury and the patient is secured to the operating table to ensure no movement during periods of extreme tilt and rotation. A “test run” of positioning helps ensure patient position and prevent intraoperative injuries. For coloanal access, it is essential to leave 3 to 4 cm of the buttocks hanging off the edge of the table to allow adequate exposure for the transanal portion of the operation. An orogastric tube is placed for tube gastric decompression. Once positioned, a careful digital examination, proctoscopy, or anoscopy may be performed to confirm the preoperative assessment of tumor margin and ensure that sphincter preservation is feasible. Rectal irrigation is then performed with dilute povidone-iodine solution. Skin preparation of the abdomen, perineum, and perianal region is performed per standard protocol. A Foley catheter is placed after preparation to ensure the entire field is sterile.
Operative Steps
Port placement and abdominal exploration
High ligation of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and inferior mesenteric vein (IMV)
Splenic flexure takedown and left colon mobilization
Proctectomy with TME
Transanal rectal transection and perineal dissection
Specimen extraction and creation of a neorectum
Anastomosis
Diverting loop ileostomy
Port Placement and Abdominal Exploration
The abdomen is entered using an open technique and a 12-mm Hasson port is placed at the umbilicus. Two additional 5-mm ports are placed on the right side of the abdomen under laparoscopic guidance. Although ports are typically placed lateral to the rectus sheath, in a tall patient with a narrow pelvis, placing ports more medially may be helpful to prevent coning of the instruments in the pelvis. One of the ports may be placed through the planned ileostomy site, but often this site is not ideal for a working port. A third 5-mm port is typically required for retraction. This may be placed in the left lower quadrant, suprapubic midline, or upper abdominal midline. An upper midline port has the benefit of allowing the camera operator to stand to the left of the operating surgeon on the same side of the patient and easily retract the rectum or transverse colon with the left hand while controlling the camera with the right. This position is especially beneficial when performing a sub-IMV mobilization of the left colon and splenic flexure. The authors’ typical port placement and operating room setup is shown in Figure 15-2.
An initial evaluation is performed to determine the laparoscopic feasibility of the operation and to evaluate for metastatic disease. If significant adhesions from prior surgery exist, the surgeon must decide to attempt laparoscopic lysis or to convert to open surgery. The peritoneum is inspected for signs of tumor implantation in all four quadrants. The diaphragm is examined as is the capsule of the liver, including the inferior aspects by elevating the left and right lobes. The ovaries are inspected because there is a 3-8% incidence of ovarian metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. The pelvis is assessed to evaluate for lateral extension of the tumor, although this may be difficult to determine until the pelvic dissection begins.
High Ligation of the Inferior Mesentery Artery and Inferior Mesentery Vein: Medial-to-Lateral Approaches
The patient is placed in the Trendelenburg position, with the right side down and the small bowel is reflected out of the pelvis. Occasionally, right-sided adhesions prevent retraction of the cecum and small intestines. Lysis of these adhesions helps provide a clear window into the pelvis and prevent small bowel migration into the operative field. The sigmoid colon is reflected anteriorly and to the left by the assistant to place the right side of the mesorectum on stretch. If the sigmoid is adhesed to the anterior pelvis, it may be necessary to free these attachments as well to provide adequate reduction of the sigmoid out of the pelvis. The peritoneum overlying the right side of the mesorectum distal to the IMA is opened over the sacral promontory. The superior hemorrhoidal vessels are elevated into the open space exposing the presacral vessels and nerves (Fig. 15-3). Branches of the hypogastric nerves lying between the aorta and the IMA are preserved and swept caudally toward the aorta. The left ureter is identified in its retroperitoneal position along the left pelvic sidewall beneath the vessels. If difficulty is encountered elevating the proximal rectum to perform this medial-to-lateral dissection, it may be beneficial to divide the lateral or anterior attachments to the sigmoid colon. The origin of the IMA is traced back to the aorta, just caudal to the ligament of Treitz, and is isolated circumferentially, preserving lymph nodes with the specimen. The IMA is transected using a stapler, clips, or an energy device. It is essential that the left ureter has been definitively identified and preserved before transection of the vessel.
The left colon mesentery is then further mobilized in a medial-to-lateral manner, lifting the mesocolon off of the retroperitoneum. The bare area of the left colon mesentery is divided cephalad from the IMA origin along the anterior surface of the aorta, medial to the IMV, elevating the IMV and the ascending left colic artery in the process (Fig. 15-4). High ligation of the IMV is essential for adequate length on the descending colon. The vessel should be isolated and divided near the inferior border of the pancreas where it dives posterior to converge with the splenic vein. The left colic artery may then be divided at the bifurcation of the left colic and superior hemorrhoidal, leaving the IMA origin and superior hemorrhoidal with the specimen and preserving any branches from the left colic artery to the descending colon.
Splenic Flexure Takedown and Left Colon Mobilization
Dissection proceeds in a medial-to-lateral direction, under the transected IMA and IMV. The retroperitoneum can be maintained intact and swept caudally, preserving the left ureter, gonadal vessels, and psoas muscle intact. This dissection continues from the pelvic brim inferiorly to the inferior border of the pancreas superiorly and laterally to the white line of Toldt. After mobilizing the left
mesocolon off of the retroperitoneum, the colon is retracted medially and the lateral attachments are divided along the length of the descending colon. The plane of transection should be just medial to the white line of Toldt to leave the retroperitoneum undisturbed.
mesocolon off of the retroperitoneum, the colon is retracted medially and the lateral attachments are divided along the length of the descending colon. The plane of transection should be just medial to the white line of Toldt to leave the retroperitoneum undisturbed.
FIGURE 15-3 Dissection of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). At the level of the sacral promontory, the IMA is tented anteriorly toward the abdominal wall, allowing for dissection parallel and deep to the artery. Note the IMA is transected proximal to the left colic artery. Nerve fibers from the sympathetic plexus lie below the artery, and are swept down and preserved. Before transection, identification of the left ureter is vital to ensure it is not inadvertently transected with the vascular bundle.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |