Laboratory Follow-Up of the Recurrent Stone Former


1. Clinicians should obtain a single 24-h urine specimen for stone risk factors within 6 months of the initiation of treatment to assess response to dietary and/or medical therapy [Expert Opinion]

2. After the initial follow-up, clinicians should obtain a single 24-h urine specimen annually or with greater frequency, depending on stone activity, to assess patient adherence and metabolic response [Expert Opinion]

3. Clinicians should obtain periodic blood testing to assess for adverse effects in patients on pharmacological therapy [Standard; Evidence Strength Grade: A]

4. Clinicians should obtain a repeat stone analysis, when available, especially in patients not responding to treatment [Expert Opinion]

5. Clinicians should monitor patients with struvite stones for reinfection with urease-producing organisms and utilize strategies to prevent such occurrences [Expert Opinion]

6. Clinicians should periodically obtain follow-up imaging studies to assess for stone growth or new stone formation based on stone activity (plan abdominal imaging, renal ultrasonography, or low dose computed tomography [CT]) [Expert Opinion]


Expert Opinion: a statement achieved by consensus of the panel, based on members’ clinical training, experience, knowledge, and judgment for which there is no evidence

Standard: a directive statement that an action should or should not be undertaken based on Grade A or Grade B evidence

Recommendation: a directive statement that an action should or should not be undertaken based on Grade C evidence

Grade A Evidence: well-conducted randomized controlled trials or exceptionally strong observational studies

Grade B Evidence: randomized controlled trials with some weaknesses of procedure or generalizability or generally strong observational studies

Grade C Evidence: observational studies that are inconsistent, having small sample size or have other problems that potentially confound interpretation of data

Adapted from Pearle MS, Goldfarb DS, Assimos DG, Curhan G, Denu-Ciocca CJ, Matlaga BR, Monga M, Penniston KL, Preminger GM, Turk TM, White JR. Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2014;192(2):316–24. With permission from Elsevier




Serum Testing


A basic metabolic panel (including serum glucose, blood urea nitrogen, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, creatinine, and calcium) should be obtained in all stone formers. Serum phosphorus and uric acid may also be helpful in the work-up [1, 2]. Serum chemistries may suggest underlying medical conditions associated with stone disease. Hypokalemia and low serum bicarbonate are features of Type 1 renal tubular acidosis. High serum calcium and low serum phosphate would be indicative of primary hyperparathyroidism. Hyperuricemia may suggest a risk of gout [13].

A number of medications prescribed for stone prevention are associated with potential adverse effects, some of which can be detected upon follow-up serum testing. Table 13.2 describes common medications used for stone prevention and potential side effects that can be picked up on serum testing. Furthermore thiazide diuretics may uncover patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Patients with undiagnosed primary hyperparathyroidism may develop hypercalcemia after being started on thiazide therapy [1].


Table 13.2.
Adverse effects of medications used to prevent urolithiasis detected via serum testing.




























Medication

Effect on serum testing

Thiazide diuretics (HCTZ, chlorthalidone, indapamide)

Hypokalemia, hyperglycemia/glucose intolerance, hyperuricemia, increased serum cholesterol [may also lead to hypocitraturia or hyperuricosuria on urinary testing]

Potassium citrate

Hyperkalemia

Sodium citrate

Hypernatremia

Allopurinol

Elevated LFTs

Tiopronin

Elevated LFTs, Anemia

Acetohydroxamic acid

Anemia

A baseline evaluation of kidney function is necessary and should be tracked over the years that the patient has a history of urolithiasis. Though there has been a correlation between a decrease in glomerular filtration rate and kidney stones, the exact etiology of this association has not been well established and may be multi-factorial (caused by recurrent episodes of ureteral obstruction, repeat urologic interventions, or due to stone disease itself as in the case of nephrocalcinosis) [4].

If serum calcium levels are borderline or elevated (>10.0 mg/dL), measurement of intact parathyroid hormone level is recommended to rule out primary hyperparathyroidism as the etiology of stone formation [1, 2]. An ionized serum calcium may be helpful if both serum calcium and PTH are at the high end of the normal values to diagnose primary hyperparathyroidism. Secondary hyperparathyroidism due to vitamin D deficiency would be suspected if PTH is high and serum calcium is low or normal. One would also expect urinary calcium to be low. Measurement of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D would then be indicated (and would be found to be low).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 3, 2016 | Posted by in NEPHROLOGY | Comments Off on Laboratory Follow-Up of the Recurrent Stone Former

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access