Interpretation of Urine Electrolytes and Osmolality


Electrolyte

Use

Na+

To assess volume status
 
Differential diagnosis of hyponatremia
 
Differential diagnosis of AKI
 
To assess salt intake in patients with hypertension
 
To evaluate calcium and uric acid excretion in stone-formers
 
To calculate electrolyte-free-water clearance

Cl

Differential diagnosis of metabolic alkalosis

K+

Differential diagnosis of hypokalemia
 
To calculate electrolyte-free-water reabsorption
 
To calculate transtubular K+ gradient

Creatinine

To calculate fractional excretion of Na+ and renal failure index
 
To assess the adequacy of 24-h urine collection

Urine osmolality

Differential diagnosis of hyponatremia
 
Differential diagnosis of polyuria
 
Differential diagnosis of AKI

Urine anion gap

To distinguish primarily hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis between distal renal tubular acidosis and diarrhea

Electrolyte-free-water clearance

To assess the amount of water excretion (without solutes) only in the management of hypo- and hypernatremia


AKI acute kidney injury




Certain Pertinent Calculations



Fractional Excretion of Na+ (FENa) and Urea Nitrogen (FEUrea)


Urine Na+ excretion is influenced by a number of hormonal and other factors. Changes in water excretion by the kidney can result in changes in urine Na+ concentration [Na+] . For example, patients with diabetes insipidus can excrete 10 L of urine per day. Their urine [Na+] may be inappropriately low due to dilution, suggesting the presence of volume depletion. Conversely, increased water reabsorption by the kidney can raise the urine [Na+] and mask the presence of hypovolemia. To correct for water reabsorption, the renal handling of Na+ can be evaluated directly by calculating the FENa, which is defined as the ratio of urine to plasma Na+ divided by the ratio of urine (UCr) to plasma creatinine(PCr), multiplied by 100.





$$\begin{aligned} \text{F}{{\text{E}}_{\text{Na}}}\text{( }\!\!\%\!\!\text{ )}&=\frac{\text{Quantity of N}{{\text{a}}^{\text{+}}}\text{ excreted}}{\text{Quantity of N}{{\text{a}}^{\text{+}}}\text{ filtered}} \\ & =\frac{{{\text{U}}_{\text{Na}}}+{{\text{P}}_{\text{Cr}}}}{{{\text{P}}_{\text{Na}}}+{{\text{U}}_{\text{Cr}}}}\times \text{100}\text{.}\end{aligned}$$

The FENa is the excreted fraction of filtered Na+. The major use of FENa is in patients with AKI . Patients with prerenal azotemia have low (< 1 %) FENa compared to patients with acute tubular necrosis (ATN) , whose FENa is generally high (> 2 %). When ATN is superimposed on decreased effective arterial blood volume due to hepatic cirrhosis or congestive heart failure, the FENa is < 2 % because of the intense stimulus to Na+ reabsorption. Similarly, patients with ATN, due to radiocontrast agents or rhabdomyolysis have low FENa for unknown reasons.

It was shown that FENa in children with nephrotic syndrome is helpful in the treatment of edema with diuretics. In these patients, FENa < 0.2 % is indicative of volume contraction, and > 0.2 % is suggestive of volume expansion. Therefore, patients with FENa > 0.2 % can be treated with diuretics to improve edema.

The FENa is substantially altered in patients on diuretics . In these patients, the FENa is usually high despite hypoperfusion of the kidneys. In such patients, the FEUrea may be helpful. In euvolemic subjects, the FEUrea ranges between 50 and 65 %. In a hypovolemic individual, the FEUrea is < 35 %. Thus, a low FEUrea seems to identify those individuals with renal hypoperfusion despite the use of a diuretic .


Fractional Excretion of Uric Acid (FEUA) and Phosphate (FEPO4)


Uric acid excretion is increased in patients with hyponatremia due to syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) secretion or syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis and cerebral salt wasting. As a result, serum uric acid level in both conditions is low (< 4 mg/dL). Since serum uric acid levels are altered by volume changes, it is better to use FEUA. In both SIADH and cerebral salt wasting, FEUA is > 10 % (normal 5–10 %). In order to distinguish these conditions, FEPO4 is used. In SIADH, the FEPO4 is < 20 % (normal < 20 %), and it is > 20 % in cerebral salt wasting.


Transtubular K+ Gradient


Transtubular K+ gradient (TTKG) is an indirect measure of K+ secretion in the distal nephron (cortical collecting duct and to some extent late distal convoluted tubule). In a healthy individual, determination of urine [K+] reflects the amount of dietary K+ because of its secretion in the distal nephron. TTKG reflects the activity of aldosterone, the major hormone that regulates K+ secretion. In hypokalemic and hyperkalemic conditions, the urinary excretion of K+ is low and high, respectively. However, water reabsorption in the cortical and medullary collecting ducts is an important determinant of urinary K+ concentration. For example, an increase in water reabsorption increases and a decrease in water reabsorption decreases urine [K+]. Therefore, an appropriate method to calculate urine [K+] is the transtubular K+ gradient (TTKG) , which is calculated as follows:





$$\text{TTKG}=\frac{{{\text{U}}_{\text{K}}}\times {{\text{P}}_{\text{Osm}}}}{{{\text{P}}_{\text{K}}}\times {{\text{U}}_{\text{Osm}}}},$$

where UK and PK are urine and plasma K+ concentrations, respectively, and POsm and UOsm are plasma and urine osmolalities, respectively. The urine to plasma osmolality ratio is used to correct the [K+] in the urine for the amount of water reabsorbed in the distal nephron. TTKG is mostly useful in the evaluation of patients with hyperkalemia, but it can also be used in the evaluation of hypokalemia.

In normal subjects on a regular diet, the TTKG varies between 6 and 8. A TTKG value < 5–7 in a patient with hyperkalemia indicates impaired distal tubular secretion of K+ due to aldosterone deficiency or resistance. Patients with mineralocorticoid excess should have a TTKG > 10. In a patient with hypokalemia, the distal nephron should decrease the secretion of K+, and a TTKG value should be < 2.

Two assumptions must be met before using the TTKG formula: (1) there must be adequate ADH activity, which is verified by measuring urine osmolality that should exceed serum osmolality, and (2) there must be adequate delivery of filtrate to the distal nephron for K+ secretion. This can be verified by determining urine Na+, which should be > 25 mEq/L.


Urine Anion Gap


Urine anion gap (UAG) is an indirect measure of NH4 + excretion, which is not routinely determined in the clinical laboratory. However, it is measured by determining the urine concentrations of Na+, K+, and Cl and is calculated as [Na+] + [K+] − [Cl]. In general, NH4 + is excreted with Cl. A normal individual has a negative (from 0 to −  50) UAG (Cl > Na+ + K+), suggesting adequate excretion of NH4 +. On the other hand, a positive (from 0 to + 50) UAG (Na+ + K+ > Cl) indicates a defect in NH4  excretion. The UAG is used clinically to distinguish primarily hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis due to distal renal tubular acidosis (RTA) and diarrhea. Both conditions cause normal anion gap metabolic acidosis and hypokalemia. Although the urine pH is always > 6.5 in distal RTA, it is variable in patients with diarrhea because of unpredictable volume changes. The UAG is always positive in patients with distal RTA, indicating reduced NH4 + excretion, whereas, it is negative in patients with diarrhea because these patients can excrete adequate amounts of NH4 +. Also, positive UAG is observed in acidoses that are characterized by low NH4 + excretion (type 4 RTA).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 20, 2017 | Posted by in NEPHROLOGY | Comments Off on Interpretation of Urine Electrolytes and Osmolality

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access