Injection and Cautery Methods for Nonvariceal Bleeding Control




Upper gastrointestinal bleeding remains one of the most common challenges faced by gastroenterologists and endoscopists in daily clinical practice. Endoscopic management of nonvariceal bleeding has been shown to improve clinical outcomes, with significant reduction of recurrent bleeding, need for surgery, and mortality. Early upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is recommended in all patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding within 24 hours of presentation, although appropriate resuscitation, stabilization of hemodynamic parameters, and optimization of comorbidity before endoscopy are essential.


Key points








  • Epinephrine remains the most used method to achieve initial hemostasis, but it should only be used in conjunction with a second endoscopic hemostatic procedure.



  • Sclerosants and acrylate glue injection might be used as rescue therapy in selected cases.



  • Hemostasis with argon plasma coagulation is easy to perform, allows treating lesions in awkward positions with a reduced depth of penetration, and has been proven to be effective in controlling nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, especially extended superficial vascular lesions.



  • All cautery methods are equally effective tools and the choice depends essentially on the experience of the operator, the type, and the site of the bleeding lesion.






Introduction


Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is predominantly nonvariceal in origin and remains one of the most common challenges faced by gastroenterologists and endoscopists in daily clinical practice. Endoscopic management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes, with significant reduction of recurrent bleeding, need for surgery, and mortality. Different methods of endoscopic interventions can be categorized on their mechanism of action and include injection therapy, thermal coagulation, or mechanical therapy. Several meta-analyses have consistently shown that cautery devices and clips are effective methods for securing hemostasis in peptic ulcer bleeding, with no single modality proven superior. Both thermal and mechanical methods can be preceded by injection therapy, an approach known as combination therapy, to slow or stop bleeding before the application of subsequent definitive therapy.




Introduction


Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is predominantly nonvariceal in origin and remains one of the most common challenges faced by gastroenterologists and endoscopists in daily clinical practice. Endoscopic management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes, with significant reduction of recurrent bleeding, need for surgery, and mortality. Different methods of endoscopic interventions can be categorized on their mechanism of action and include injection therapy, thermal coagulation, or mechanical therapy. Several meta-analyses have consistently shown that cautery devices and clips are effective methods for securing hemostasis in peptic ulcer bleeding, with no single modality proven superior. Both thermal and mechanical methods can be preceded by injection therapy, an approach known as combination therapy, to slow or stop bleeding before the application of subsequent definitive therapy.




Indications/contraindications


Early upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is recommended in all patients presenting with UGIB within 24 hours of presentation. At urgent endoscopy, recognition of high-risk endoscopic signs is essential for proper therapeutic planning. Endoscopic treatment is indicated for patients found to have spurting or oozing active bleeding and for those with a nonbleeding exposed vessel in an ulcer. Overlying adherent clots should be irrigated to evaluate and potentially treat the underlying lesion. However, the management of peptic ulcers with adherent clots that are resistant to removal by irrigation is still controversial. Ulcers with low-risk stigmata (ie, those with pigmented spots of hematin or fibrin-covered clean base) do not warrant any endoscopic intervention.


Appropriate resuscitation and stabilization of hemodynamic parameters are essential. No endoscopic procedure should be done at the expense of adequate resuscitation.




Technique/procedure


Preparation, Patient Positioning, and Approach


Upper endoscopy in patients with GI bleeding should be carried out in an adequately equipped setting, be it the endoscopy suite or the operating theater, by qualified operators. A therapeutic endoscope with a 3.7-mm operative channel should be used, if available. Scopes with 6-mm “jumbo” channels or double-channel scopes may occasionally be required. All devices for endoscopic hemostasis (injection needles and solutions, monopolar or bipolar thermal probes, and mechanical devices such as hemoclips) should be available and ready to be used by skilled personnel. The assistance of an anesthesiologist is required in patients with severe hematemesis, and orotracheal intubation should be considered in such selected cases to prevent aspiration.


The quality of endoscopy can be adversely affected by poor visibility in patients requiring urgent endoscopy with UGIB due to obscuring blood in the gastric lumen. In 3% to 19% of the cases, no apparent cause of UGIB can be identified.


In fact, a bleeding lesion may not be identified because of the presence of food or blood debris hampering proper endoscopic visualization (particularly for awkwardly positioned lesions) or because of the presence of lesions that are difficult to identify if not actively bleeding, specifically, vascular lesions. Apart from the routine use of water-jet pikes for irrigation and adequate suction power applied to the endoscope, the patient may need to be rolled over to positions different from the initial left lateral decubitus position to dislocate the blood pool and make the lesion visible. In the case of a large uncleared fundal pool, consider inserting a large-bore nasogastric tube to empty the stomach and repeat the examination shortly thereafter.


The systematic use of a nasogastric tube before endoscopy is not recommended, but in selected patients, it may offer important prognostic information.


Pre-endoscopic administration of intravenous erythromycin or metoclopramide (20–120 minutes before endoscopy) has been shown to reduce the need for repeat endoscopy to determine the site and cause of bleeding in patients with UGIB. This adjunct is important to treatment with regard to the ability to make a diagnosis, apply definitive treatment, and avoid unnecessary exposure of patients to repeat procedures; the use of prokinetic agents is advisable in patients with a high probability of having fresh blood or a clot in the stomach when undergoing endoscopy to increase diagnostic yield ( Fig. 1 ).




Fig. 1


Treatment algorithm for patients with NVUGIB. IV, intravenous.


Injection Methods


Endoscopic injection is widely used for the arrest of active ulcer bleeding and for the prevention of rebleeding from ulcers with visible vessels. The principle of injection therapy is to create a combination of hydrostatic pressure, tissue edema, vasoconstriction, and inflammatory changes in the region of the ulcer.


Injection needles are single-use or autoclavable, Teflon or stainless steel, 7-Fr catheter sheaths with retractile needles varying from 19 to 25 G. The length of the needle may vary from 4 to 6 mm, although recommended needle length is 4 mm ( Fig. 2 A).




Fig. 2


Endoscopic tools for injection and cautery hemostasis. ( A ) The Cook Medical disposable injector needle (7-Fr sheath with 23-G, 4-mm-long needle extruded). ( B ) The 3.7-mm hydrothermal probe (Heater Probe, Olympus, Bloomfield, CT). ( C ) The 3.2-mm ERBE APC forward probe.

( Courtesy of [ A ] Cook Medical, Inc, Bloomington, IL; with permission; [ B ] Olympus America, Inc; with permission; [ C ] ERBE USA Inc, Marietta, GA; with permission.)


The most commonly used injectates for bleeding control are the following:




  • Epinephrine



  • Sclerosants



  • Tissue adhesives or glues (acrylates and fibrin glue)



Epinephrine


Because of its widespread availability, low cost, and simplicity, local epinephrine is the most commonly used injective therapy. Epinephrine is usually injected as diluted 1:10,000 or 1:20,000 saline solution by a standard needle at 0.5- to 2-mL aliquots per injection. Higher doses of injected epinephrine are more likely to cause cardiovascular side effects, particularly when injected around the region of gastroesophageal junction and the distal esophagus; some endoscopists advocate the use of more diluted solution (1: 100,000) to avoid complications.


Injections are placed tangentially into and around the bleeding source until the bleeding halts or slows and the surface becomes pale.


The proposed mechanisms of action of epinephrine injection involve the following :



  • 1.

    Local tamponade effect induced by the volume of solution injected with vessel squeezing;


  • 2.

    Vasoconstriction but not vessel thrombosis;


  • 3.

    Direct effect on the clotting process at the site of the arterial defect (platelet aggregation).



Different studies have investigated the optimal volume needed to obtain a hemostatic effect of epinephrine. Injection of large volumes (13–20 mL) of epinephrine is superior to low volumes (5–10 mL) in reducing the rate of recurrent bleeding in high-risk patients. Also, data from Korea showed that injection of 35 to 45 mL of epinephrine was more effective in preventing recurrent bleeding from ulcers in the gastric body than injection of 15 to 25 mL (0% vs 17.1%). Although endoscopic injection of epinephrine is considered safe, the injected volume of epinephrine should not be unlimited, because of the risk of systemic absorption. Even if infrequent, adverse cardiac events have been described after a high volume (30 mL) of epinephrine for treatment of a bleeding Mallory-Weiss tear.


Sclerosants


Sclerosants agents, such as polidocanol, ethanol, and ethanolamine, induce local inflammation and subsequent fibrosis, obliterating the lumen of the vessel. The technique is similar to that used for epinephrine, but volumes are much smaller (usually a maximum of 1 mL, divided in 0.1–0.3 mL aliquots per injection at 3–4 sites around or into the visible vessel) due to the potential risk of ulceration, necrosis, and perforation described for those agents. In clinical trials, when tested in combination with epinephrine, no additive effect of sclerosants was observed, either as a subsequent injection or as a mixture of the 2. Moreover, polidocanol has been associated with transmural necrosis, and injections in the gastric fundus are contraindicated because of the risk of late perforations. If ethanol is used, caution is recommended to avoid tissue necrosis and perforation.


The use of sclerosants for NVUGIB should be avoided in routine practice but still can be considered a valuable alternative option to treat bleeding lesions when a second method is not feasible.


Cyanoacrylate


N -butyl-2-cyanoacrylate is a tissue adhesive that on contact with water polymerizes into a firm clot. It is commonly used in Europe in the treatment of bleeding varices and has been tested also for the treatment of refractory peptic ulcer bleeding.


The glue can be used either undiluted or as a mixture of cyanoacrylate and lipiodol, an oily contrast agent to delay polymerization. The injection technique is not as user-friendly as an epinephrine injection because the glue hardens quickly and there is the potential risk of damaging the endoscope, the operator, and patient if the glue is accidentally dispersed.


Briefly, the technique of acrylate injection is as follows:




  • The 21-G or 23-G metal luer-lock injector needle must be preinjected with sterile water;



  • Acrylate glue is then slowly injected directly into the bleeding point (the glue is sticky with a considerable resistance to injection). To minimize the risk of embolization, not more than 1 or 2 mL glue is injected.



  • Glue injection is immediately followed by 2 to 4 mL of distilled water to deliver the glue from the “dead space” of the catheter. The endoscopy assistant announces the end of this second injection, and the operator retracts the needle.



At the end of the injection procedure, the glue spills with formation of a hard plug obliterating the bleeding point. If the bleeding persists more than 60 seconds after the first injection, a second 1 mL can be injected with the same modality. If the glue sticks to the lens, the endoscope should be withdrawn and cleaned with ethanol or nail polish remover immediately. The endoscopy assistant should be well trained in the injection technique; the presence of a second nurse is recommended for preparing the additional injection catheters and cyanoacrylate vials. Care must be taken to protect the eyes of the patient and the clinical personnel. Goggles are required for eye protection during preparation and injection of the glue.


In a randomized trial comparing cyanoacrylate with hypertonic saline-epinephrine injection in 126 patients with high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers, there were no differences in outcomes between the 2 groups, but 2 cases (1 fatal) of arterial embolization occurred in the cyanoacrylate group. This complication was also reported in other case series (as both arterial and portal venous embolization). Cyanoacrylate has also been successfully used to treat bleeding Dieulafoy lesions and as a spray to treat difficult-to-control malignant and nonmalignant GI bleeding.


In the endoscopy setting, acrylate glue injection should be limited to selected cases of refractory nonvariceal bleeding as rescue therapy in patients after failure of conventional endoscopic therapies.


Fibrin glue


Fibrin glue is a 2-component system in which concentrated fibrinogen and factor XIII are combined with thrombin and calcium to simulate the final stage of the clotting cascade. Components are injected either as a subsequent injection in a standard 23-G injector needle or as a mixture of the 2 trough, a special dual-channel needle, to mix and activate the clotting cascade only when injected.


In patients pretreated with epinephrine, multiple fibrin sealant injections were associated with less recurrent bleeding compared with polidocanol. Other studies did not confirm any advantage in adding the fibrin glue to epinephrine injection alone. The precise role for fibrin sealant remains to be defined. Moreover, because the substance is relatively expensive and its use can be associated with the potential transmission of infectious diseases today, the use of fibrin glue is discouraged as a primary treatment modality.


Sodium hyaluronate


Sodium hyaluronate is a natural polysaccharide with peculiar viscoelastic characteristics that make it an excellent candidate for endoscopic submucosal dissection because of its ability to create a persistent submucosal cushion. In 2 case reports, sodium hyaluronate has been used to successfully achieve endoscopic hemostatic in bleeding ulcers; however, clinical trials are needed.


Outcomes of Injection Therapy


Randomized trials indicate epinephrine injection is effective at achieving initial hemostasis in patients with active bleeding. However, epinephrine monotherapy provides suboptimal efficacy and is inferior to other monotherapies or to combination therapy that uses 2 or more methods in preventing further bleeding in patients with high-risk stigmata. Compared with injection monotherapy, other monotherapies provide a significantly superior protection against the risk of recurrent bleeding (relative risk [RR] 0.58; confidence interval, [CI] 95%, 0.36 to 0.93), with clinically relevant number needed to treat (NNT) of 9.


Several meta-analyses indicate that adding a second procedure, such as a second injectate (for example, alcohol, thrombin, or fibrin glue), thermal contact, or clips, is superior to epinephrine injection alone. A recent systematic review confirmed that the use of a second procedure (regardless of which second procedure is applied) following epinephrine injection significantly reduces the risk of further bleeding (RR 0.53 [CI 95%, 0.35 to 0.81]) and the need for emergency surgery (RR 0.68 [CI 95%, 0.50 to 0.93]), but did not affect mortality. Also, combined therapy significantly reduced the rebleeding rate for ulcers with active bleeding (either spurting or oozing) but not for nonactively bleeding ulcers (exposed vessels or adherent clots).


International consensus recommendations advocate that if epinephrine is used to treat peptic ulcer bleeding with high-risk stigmata, it should not be used alone, but a second endoscopic treatment modality should also be used.


Injection therapy can also be used after clip placement or cautery therapy to treat residual oozing.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 10, 2017 | Posted by in GASTOINESTINAL SURGERY | Comments Off on Injection and Cautery Methods for Nonvariceal Bleeding Control

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access