Without immunoprophylaxis
With immunoprophylaxis at infancy
Infant of HBsAg(+), HBeAg(+) mother
>95 % infected, ≥90 % chronicity ratea among infected infants [6]
Vaccine + HBIG → 10 % chronic infection [54]
Infant of HBsAg(+), HBeAg(−) mother
0.29 % chronic infection if no HBIG at birth, 0.14 % if with HBIG, risk of FH or AH reduced [54]
Toddler
5.0 % infected, chronicity rate among infected 23 % [7]
–
Young adult
1.5 % infected, chronicity rate among infected 2.7 % [8]
–
Intrauterine infection occurs rarely in <5 % of the infants to HBeAg and HBsAg positive mothers. In our study in Taiwan during 10 years, 2.4 % of the 665 infants of HBeAg and HBsAg positive mothers were seropositive for HBsAg at birth, suggesting intrauterine infection [10]. They remained HBsAg positive at 12 months of age. Transplacental leakage of HBeAg-positive maternal blood, which is induced by uterine contractions during pregnancy and the disruption of placental barriers, is the most likely route to cause HBV intrauterine infection [11].
Acute or fulminant hepatitis B can occur in infancy. The incidence of fulminant hepatitis B is higher in infancy than in other age periods. Mother-to-infant transmission, mainly from HBeAg negative, HBsAg positive mothers, is the most important route o f transmission for acute or fulminant hepatitis in infancy [12, 13].
Active and/or Passive HBV Immunization
HBV immunization can be classified into passive immunization and active immunization. Passive immunization using hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) provides temporary immunity, while active immunization by vaccine yields long-term immunity. Perinatal transmission is the most important transmission route of HBV, particularly in endemic areas, and therefore, prevention by active and passive immunization against HBV should be initiated at birth. Additional doses of HBV vaccine should be given during infancy.
Other prevention modalities , such as screening the blood products, proper sterilization of injection needles and syringes, and avoidance of risky behaviors, such as parenteral drug abuse, tattoo, or skin piercing to prevent horizontal transmission are also important. Many countries with low prevalence of HBV infection also have HBV vaccination program for adolescents to prevent the exposure to HBV by sexual contacts or other risk behaviors. But the program is not as successful as the infantile HBV immunization strategy.
Passive Immunization Against HBV Infection Using HBIG
HBIG is prepared from the pooled plasma of donors who have high levels of anti-HBs. During the process of extraction for anti-HBs, viruses are inactivated, and solvents used in the preparation are removed. It excluded the products tested positive for HBsAg, anti-HCV, and HIV. It is used for post-exposure prophylaxis (passive immunoprophylaxis) of HBV infection.
HBIG was given immediately after birth to infants of HBeAg-positive HBsAg carrier mothers. In comparison to the 91 % of HBsAg carrier rate among infants without immunoprophylaxis, the HBsAg carrier rate was 26 % among infants who received three doses of HBIG at birth, 3 and 6 months old, and was 54 % in those who received a single 1.0 ml dose of HBIG at birth. The prevention efficacy was 45 % by one dose of 1.0 ml HBIG and 75 % by three doses of HBIG, respectively [14].
Active Immunization Against HBV Infection Using Hepatitis B Vaccine
Currently, there are two kinds o f HBV vaccine on the market, the plasma-derived vaccine and the recombinant vaccine. The first HBsAg-based highly purified and inactivated vaccine was made by Dr. Maurice Hilleman from chronic HBV infected subject’ serum [15]. In order to produce a safe vaccine, stringent treatments with pepsin, urea, and formaldehyde and rigorous filtration to destroy all viruses, and chimpanzees test was conducted [16]. The plasma vaccine was approved by FDA of the USA in 1981 [17]. By inserting the gene coding for HBsAg, HBsAg was expressed in yeast to develop the recombinant HBV vaccine [18] and was licensed in 1986 [19]. Gradually, recombinant vaccine replaced plasma vaccine, and becomes the main vaccine used worldwide.
Active immunization with three or four doses of HBV vaccine without HBIG was proved to be immunogenic in more than 90 % of infants of non-carrier mothers or HBeAg-negative carrier mothers. Pilot clinical trial revealed that for infants of HBsAg negative mothers, the first dose of vaccine at 1 week stimulated anti-HBs within 1 month in 48 % of the neonates, and in 91 % at 2 months after the second dose. By the age of 6 months and 7 months, 96 % and 100 % vaccinees developed anti-HBs after a third dose, respectively [20].
For infants of HBeAg and HBsAg seropositive mothers , 23 % was HBsAg(+) after three doses of HBV plasma vaccine given at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months of age, while the HBsAg positive rate was 88 % in the unvaccinated infants. The prevention efficacy of using HBV vaccines was around 75 % (Beasley RP, et al. Unpublished data).
Active Plus Passive Immunization Against HBV Infection
Clinical trial combining HBIG immediately after birth followed by HBV vaccination for infants of HBeAg positive, HBsAg carrier mothers was conducted in Taiwan. The prevention efficacy was 94 %, which is superior to HBIG alone (71 %) or vaccination alone (74 %) [21, 22]. This best result of HBV prevention against perinatal transmission of HBV infection by highly infectious mothers established the ground of the later universal HBV immunization strategies and program used currently. A subsequent study using HBIG at birth and three 5-μg doses of recombinant HBV vaccine, only 4.8 % of the high risk infants became chronic carriers, with a >90 % level of protection and a rate comparable with that seen with HBIG and plasma derived hepatitis B vacc ine [23]
The Timing, Strategies, and Global Status of the HBV Immunization Programs
Since the most common and important transmission route is mother-to-infant transmission during perinatal period, the most appropriate timing for HBV immunization should be started at birth, and additional doses of vaccine should be given in infancy to elicit early and long term protection. In the world first universal hepatitis B immunization program in Taiwan, immunization was given at birth with passive HBIG , and then three or four doses of hepatitis B vaccine . The strategy of universal HBV vaccination in infancy is more effective than selective immunization for high-risk groups.
There are three major strategies of HBV Immunization and screening of maternal HBV markers during pregnancy in different countries, depending on their epidemiologic features of HBV infection and available resources (Fig. 19.1):
Fig. 19.1
Three major strategies of universal HBV immunization in the world countries
Strategy 1. Combination of active and passive HBV immunization with maternal screening of HBeAg and HBsAg; this is conducted in highly endemic areas such as Taiwan.
Strategy 2. Combination of active and passive HBV immunization with maternal screening of HBsAg; it is conducted in areas with adequate resources, such as in the USA and Italy [24, 25].
Strategy 3. Active HBV immunization without maternal screening and HBIG. It is conducted in areas with limited resources.
The cost-effectiveness per case prevented by Strategy 2 was estimated to be highest; for Strategy 3 was lowest [26]. However, the protection for high risk mothers’ infants is higher in Strategy 1 or 2 than strategy 3.
Universal Maternal Screening of HBeAg and HBsAg and Combining Active and Passive HBV Immunization for Infants (Strategy 1)
The world’s first universal hepatitis B vaccination program was implemented in Taiwan using strategy 1 since July 1984. Screening for maternal serum HBsAg and HBeAg during pregnancy is conducted. Infants of highly infectious mothers with positive serum HBeAg and HBsAg received HBIG within 24 h after birth in addition to three or four doses of HBV vaccine during infancy. Infants of mothers with negative HBsAg, or positive HBsAg but negative HBeAg, or unknown HBV status received three or four doses of HBV vaccine only. The coverage rate of hepatitis B vaccine for neonates is around 94–99 % [27].
Universal Maternal Screening of HBsAg and Combining Active and Passive Immunization for Infants (Strategy 2)
In countries with low prevalence of HBV infection and better resources, HBIG is given to newborns of all HBsAg-positive mothers regardless of their HBeAg status, and three doses of HBV vaccine are given to all infants.
Since 1988, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), USA has recommended universal screening of pregnant women for HBsAg during the early prenatal period in each pregnancy. All infants should receive HBV vaccination. Infants of HBsAg seropositive mothers should receive appropriate immunization with HBIG and HBV vaccine to prevent perinatal transmission [24]. Although this strategy can save the cost of maternal screening for HBeAg, the wider use of HBIG in infants of HBsAg mothers regardless of maternal HBeAg status increases the cost.
Active HBV Immunization in Infancy Without Maternal Screening and HBIG at Birth (Strategy 3)
Using three or four doses of HBV vaccine to all infants without screening maternal HBV markers is a common practice of universal immunization program in the world. It can save the cost not only for maternal screening of HBV markers, but also the cost of HBIG. This policy is practically applicable in countries with limited resources. The results of prevention is good according the report of studies in Thailand and other countries [28].
In many endemic countries with limited resources, three doses of hepatitis B vaccine are given to all infants, regardless of the HBeAg status in HBsAg carrier mothers. This strategy offers an efficacy of around 75–80 % for infants of HBeAg-positive highly infectious mothers. Nevertheless, the cost of maternal screening and subsequent use of HBIG in the newborns can be avoided.
Global Status of the HBV Immunization Program
In 1992, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution to recommend global vaccination against hepatitis B. In 2009 WHO recommended that all infants receive the hepatitis B vaccine as soon as possible after birth, preferably within 24 h. The birth dose should be followed by two or three doses to complete the primary series.
Hepatitis B vaccine for infants was introduced nationwide in 183 countries by the end of 2013. Global coverage of infants with three doses of HBV vaccine in 1990 was only 1 %. It is gradually increased and was estimated to be as high as 81 % in 2013. A birth dose for hepatitis B vaccine was advocated by WHO, and was introduced in 93 countries by 2013, with a global coverage rate estimated as 38 %, reaching 79 % in the Western Pacific, but only 11 % in the African Region (WHO, Global immunization data) (http://www.who.immunization/monitoring_surveillance/data/en/).
The Preventive Effect of HBV Infection and Related Diseases by Immunization
Evidences support that hepatitis B vaccine provides effective protection against HBV infection and its complications, including fulminant hepatitis B, chronic hepatitis B, and its related HCC. It is the first successful cancer preventive vaccine in human [29]. It is also the first vaccine against a chronic disease [30].
Prevention of Acute Hepatitis B
Universal HBV immunization program has reduced the incidences of acute hepatitis B [31, 32]. After 25 years of un iversal HBV immunization in Taiwan, acute hepatitis B among adolescents and young adults ≤25 years old was reduced, making infants and the unvaccinated 25–39-year-old cohort additional targets for preventing acute hepatitis B (Fig. 19.2a). Vaccinated infants (0.78/100,000) had higher rates than those aged 1–14 years (0.04/100,000), due to breakthrough HBV infection from mother-to-infant transmission [32].
Prevention of Fulminant Hepatitis B
The mortality rate of fulminant hepatitis per 10 5 infants was reduced significantly from 5.1 in those who were born before the HBV vaccination program (1975–1984) to 1.71 in those born after the vaccination program in Taiwan (1985–1998) [33] (Fig. 19.2b ). The mortality in vaccinated birth cohorts decreased further by more than 90 % from 1977–1980 to 2009–2011 [34].
After universal HBV vaccination in Taiwan, HBV was found to very rarely cause fulminant hepatitis in children age ≥1 year, but remained a significant cause of fulminant hepatitis in infants [35]. The incidence rate ratio of patients age <1 year to those ages 1–15 years was 54.2 for HBV-positive fulminant hepatitis. HBV-positive fulminant hepatitis was prone to develop in infants born to HBeAg-negative, HBsAg-carrier mothers; these infants had not received HBIG according to the vaccination program in place. Maternal HBsAg was found to be positive in 97 % of the infants with fulminant hepatitis B, and maternal HBeAg was found to be negative in 84 % of these infants.
Reduction of Chronic HBV Infection Rate
Universal hepatitis B vaccination programs have effectively reduced the chronic HBV infection rate in many endemic countries. The protective efficacy of the hepatitis B vaccination program in infants born to highly infectious mothers and received HBIG and vaccine on schedule was approximately 85–90 %. The early mass survey data after the universal HBV vaccination pro gram in Taiwan revealed that the protective efficacy was 86 % in the HBIG plus HBV vaccine group and 78 % in those with only three doses of HBV vaccine alone [36].
The HBsAg seropositive rates declined to below 1 % in most countries where universal vaccination programs have been successfully conducted [37]. Serial sero-epidemiologic studies started just before the universal vaccination program and every 5 years in the post-vaccination era in Taiwan in the past three decades [38–42]. The results revealed that HBsAg seroprevalence rate among children declined from 9.8 % before the HBV immunization program to 0.5–1.2 % after the program. It implicates that Taiwan has been changed from an HBV endemic country to a low endemic country by the HBV immunization program (Fig. 19.3). The HBV infection rate (anti-HBc seropositive rate) declined from 38 to 16 % and further to 4.6 % in children 15–20 years after the HBV immunization program in Taiwan [42] (Fig. 19.3). Twelve years after integration of universal hepatitis B vaccine into the national expanded program on immunization (1992) in Thailand, the HBsAg and anti-HBc seropositive rate was reduced from 4.3 % and 15.8 % among those born before the program, to 0.7 % and 2.9 % among 6 months to 18 years old born after, respectively [28].
Fig. 19.3
Comparison of the HBsAg seropositive rates and anti-HBc seropositive rates among children born before versus after the launch of universal hepatitis B immunization program in Taiwan
In Gambia, villages with good HBV immunization program, vaccine efficacies in 1993 against HBV infection and chronic HBsAg carriage were 94.7 % and 95.3 %, respectively [43]. During 1986–1990, the Gambia Hepatitis Intervention Study (GHIS) comparing fully vaccinated vs. unvaccinated GHIS participants among the allocated 125,000 infants. HBV infection was 0.8 % (2/255) vs. 12.4 % (59/475), suggesting a vaccine efficacy of 94 % [44]. Study in Gambia also showed a lower anti-HBc positive rate of 27.4 % (70/255) among vaccinated participants in comparison to 56.0 % (267/475) among the unvaccinated subjects.
Prevention of Liver Cancer by HBV Immunization
Prevention of chronic HBV infection by immunization can effectively reduce the incidence of liver cancer. HBV vaccine is the first human cancer preventive vaccine successfully preventing the development of liver cancer [29]. Taiwan has high incidence rates of HBV infection and HCC in both children and adults. Children with HCC in Taiwan are nearly 100 % HBsAg seropositive, 86 % of them are HBeAg negative, and their mothers are mostly (94 %) HBsAg seropositive [45]. The histologic features of the HCC are similar to that in adult HCC. Most (80 %) of the non-tumor liver tissues have liver cirrhosis. Integration of HBV genome into host genome was demonstrated in the childhood HCC tissues [46].
The world first universal hepatitis B vaccination program in Taiwan has demonstrated significant reduction of the average annual incidence rate of HCC in children aged 6–14 years. It decreased from 0.52–0.54 cases per 100,000 children of the birth cohort born before the HBV vaccination program, to 0.13–0.20 cases in those born after the HBV vaccination program [47] (Table 19.2). According to a 20-year follow-up study of national cancer surveillance in Taiwan, the effect of HCC prevention by universal HBV vaccination was observed not only in children but also extended to adolescents, with an age- and sex-adjusted relative risk of 0.31 for persons vaccinated at birth [48]. Studies in Khon Kaen of Thailand also showed declines in the incidence of childhood HCC as a result of at-birth HBV immunization program [49]. Another study in Alaska, USA revealed effective reduction of HCC incidence, from 3 per 100,000 in 1984–1988 to undetectable after 1999 among Alaska Native children and adolescents under 20 years old, after 25 years of universal neonatal HBV immunization [50].
Table 19.2
Impact of universal HBV immunization on HCC incidences among <20 Years old
Diagnosed age of HCC | HCC incidence/100,000 person-year | % Reduction of HCC (after immunization) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Before HBV immunization
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |