Fig. 12.1
Molecular pathways of colorectal cancer (CRC) carcinogenesis. CIN and hereditary MSI pathways are genomic instability pathways and CIMP is an epigenomic instability pathway. CIMP CpG island methylation phenotype, CIN chromosomal instability, MMR mismatch repair, MSI microsatellite instable, MSS microsatellite stable
Chromosomal Instability
CIN refers to structural alterations or numerical gain or loss of chromosomes, leading to aneuploidy and the loss of heterozygosity. About 70% of CRCs may develop through the CIN pathway [2]. The gatekeeper mutation for adenoma development through the CIN pathway occurs in the APC tumor suppressor gene. Because APC plays a pivotal role in the Wnt signal transduction pathway, mutations in this gene can increase the proliferation of colorectal epithelial cells, thereby initiating adenoma development. Mutations in the K-RAS oncogene are also frequent genetic alterations in the CIN pathway. As the K-RAS protein is involved in the receptor tyrosine kinase cascade, K-RAS mutations affect cell proliferation and apoptosis. Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene are involved in the progression of early adenomas to late advanced adenomas. Loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 18q also contributes to CRC development as a late event in the CIN pathway. Tumor suppressor genes located on chromosome 18q include DCC, SMAD2, and SMAD4, which are important in regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis. The development of CRC may require 10–15 years, from normal colorectal mucosa to conventional adenoma to CRC, via these multistep genetic changes in the CIN pathway.
Microsatellite Instability
DNA mismatch repair (MMR) systems , such as MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, repair errors that occur during DNA replication. If MMR dysfunction occurs, mutations in other genes cannot be repaired and multiple mutations may accumulate, accelerating the CRC carcinogenic process. Microsatellites are simple repeat nucleotide sequences of DNA that are subject to mutations and base-pair substitutions during DNA replication in the presence of MMR dysfunction. The MSI pathway refers to the carcinogenic pathway stemming from MMR dysfunction. About 10–15% of CRCs show MSI. Of these, around 20% have a germline mutation in one of four MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2), a condition called the Lynch syndrome . The remaining 80% of CRCs with MSI may arise from the hypermethylation of the promoter of MLH1 [1]. The latter is an important example of epigenomic alteration and gives rise to sporadic CRCs with MSI.
CRCs that arise through hereditary MSI pathways, such as the Lynch syndrome, frequently show mutations in TGF-β and BAX, the exons of which contain microsatellites. K-RAS mutations may also occur, but p53 mutations are rare in the MSI pathway. Because MMR dysfunction increases mutation rates 100-fold, CRCs that arise through the hereditary MSI pathway may develop very rapidly, with only 3–5 years required for progression from normal mucosa to conventional adenoma to hereditary MSI CRC.
CpG Island Methylation Phenotype
Expression of a specific gene is suppressed when CpG sequences in the promoter of that gene are methylated. The CIMP pathway of colorectal carcinogenesis involves the methylation of CpG sequences of tumor suppressor genes. The CIMP pathway is also called the serrated neoplasia pathway, because this route is the main pathway through which serrated polyps progress to CRC.
Serrated polyps can be classified as HPs, sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps), and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) [3]. Histologically, serrated polyps have a saw-tooth appearance, resulting from the proliferation and hyperplasia of crypt epithelium and the resultant saw-tooth infolding of the crypt. HPs can be subdivided into microvesicular type, goblet cell-rich type, and mucin-poor type HPs. SSA/Ps are thought to arise from microvesicular-type HPs and are the main precursors of CRC through the CIMP pathway. TSAs are also believed to be premalignant polyps. However, the molecular pathway from TSA to CRC is largely unknown because TSAs are very rare.
The CIMP pathway involves the hypermethylation of the promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes and/or MLH1, a specific DNA MMR gene. Hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter can lead to MMR dysfunction followed by MSI. This pathway constitutes the carcinogenic mechanism by which SSA/Ps develop into sporadic MSI CRCs (Fig. 12.1). Tumor suppressor genes frequently silenced by the CIMP pathway include p16 and IGFBP7. BRAF oncogene mutation is another important feature in the serrated neoplasia pathway. BRAF mutations have been detected in 50–72% of microvesicular-type HPs, 70–80% of SSA/Ps, and 77% of CIMP-high CRCs, but in only 1% of conventional adenomas, supporting the hypothesis that the CIMP pathway involves the transformation of SSA/Ps to CIMP-high, BRAF-mutant CRCs [1].
Endoscopic Features of Colorectal Polyps
Colorectal polyps have a variety of histological subtypes, with conventional adenomas, including tubular/tubulovillous/villous adenomas, SSA/Ps, and TSAs being the main types of premalignant polyp. Although some hamartomatous polyps can progress to CRCs, they are rare. Endoscopic characterization of these polyps is important for histological diagnosis, thereby determining the treatment plan.
The Paris Classification
The Paris classification , formulated in 2002 and updated in 2003, was established to categorize superficial neoplastic lesions of the gastrointestinal tract (Table 12.1, Fig. 12.2) [4]. Superficial neoplastic lesions are lesions that are considered on endoscopy to be benign adenomas, mucosal cancers, and/or submucosal cancer s. The Paris classification has categorized these lesions into three morphological groups: protruding lesions (type I), nonprotruding and nonexcavated lesions (type II), and excavated lesions (type III). Type I lesions can be further subdivided into pedunculated (type Ip) and sessile (type Is) lesions, whereas type II lesions can be subdivided into slightly elevated (type IIa), completely flat (type IIb), and slightly depressed (type IIc) lesions. Types Is and IIa can be differentiated by placing a biopsy forceps next to the lesion as a calibrating gauge. A lesion protruding beyond the level of the closed jaws of the biopsy forceps (approximately 2.5 mm) is classified as type Is, whereas a lesion protruding less than this level is classified as type IIa.
Table 12.1
The Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the gastrointestinal tract [4]
Protruding | I |
---|---|
Pedunculated | Ip |
Sessile | Is |
Nonprotruding and nonexcavated | II |
Slightly elevated | IIa |
Completely flat | IIb |
Slightly depressed | IIc |
Elevated and depressed types | IIa+IIc, IIc+IIa |
Excavateda | IIIa |
Ulcer | III |
Excavated and depressed type | IIc+III, III+IIc |
Fig. 12.2
The Paris classification of colorectal polyps. (a) Type Ip polyp with head diameter 8 mm and a stalk, (b) Type Is polyp 8 mm in diameter, (c) Type IIa polyp 10 mm in diameter
Chromoscopy and Pit Patterns
Chromoscopy refers to the endoscopy technique, in which dye is sprayed on the colorectal mucosal surface to observe lesions in greater detail. Indigo carmine and crystal violet are the two most commonly used dyes. The former is a contrast agent that is not absorbed by colonic epithelial cells but enhances the contrast between a lesion and adjacent mucosa. As it exaggerates the unevenness of the polyp surface, indigo carmine spray can also assess the surface pit patterns of a polyp in greater detail. Crystal violet is an absorbable dye that can assist in the detailed assessment of surface pit patterns, especially minute pit patterns such as Kudo types IIIS, VI, and VN (Fig. 12.3).
Fig. 12.3
Chromoscopy results. (a) A type IIa polyp. (b) Chromoscopy with indigo carmine, a contrast agent makes flat polyps look more prominent. Delineation of the polyp and assessment of the surface pattern are easier with indigo carmine chromoscopy. (c) Another type IIa polyp. (d) Chromoscopy with crystal violet, an absorbable dye making assessment of fine surface pit patterns easier. Irregular type VI pit patterns are clearly delineated
A pit is a structure formed by the opening of several crypts. The pit appearances of a polyp surface have been classified into several types [5]. Pit patterns were originally assessed by magnifying chromoendoscopy. However, current high definition colonoscopes may be used to evaluate pit patterns without chromoendoscopy and/or magnification, although the accuracy of this approach should be further investigated. Pit patterns correlate well with the histopathology of colorectal polyps (Table 12.2, Fig. 12.4). The overall accuracy of pit patterns for the histological diagnosis of colorectal polyps has been estimated at approximately 70–80%, with accuracy depending on the expertise of the operator. Classification of pit patterns may help choose a treatment plan. For example, polyps with a type IIIL pit pattern are usually benign conventional adenomas and can therefore be resected endoscopically. By contrast, polyps with a type VN pit pattern are indicative of deep submucosal cancers with lymph node metastasis and should be managed by surgical resection plus lymph node dissection.
Table 12.2
Pit patterns and their correlation with histopathology of colorectal polyps
Type | Description | Most common histopathology | Management |
---|---|---|---|
I | Normal round pits | Normal colorectal mucosa | Observation |
II | Stellate or papillary pits | Hyperplastic polyp | Observation |
If SSA/P is suspected, endoscopic resection | |||
IIIS | Small round or short tubular pits | Conventional adenoma | Endoscopic resection |
IIIL | Large round or long tubular pits | Conventional adenoma | Endoscopic resection |
IV | Branch-like or gyrus-like pits | Conventional adenoma | Endoscopic resection |
VI | Irregular pits | Mucosal cancer | Endoscopic resection |
VN | Nonstructural pits | Submucosal cancer, especially deep submucosal cancer | Surgical resection |
Fig. 12.4
Pit patterns of types (a) I, (b) II, (c) IIIS, (d) IIIL, (e) IV, (f) VI, and (g) VN
Equipment-Based Image-Enhanced Endoscopy
Narrow band imaging (NBI) was developed to more clearly visualize surface microvessels. NBI uses an optical filter that selects specific ranges of wavelengths of visible light, allowing the vessels to be enhanced and visualized more prominently. Other techniques such as FICE and iScan use a software program that can modify the white light images, enhancing the microvasculature and surface structures and allowing them to be visualized more clearly. All these image-enhanced endoscopy techniques have been shown useful in the histological diagnosis of colorectal polyps.
The NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification was established to categorize colorectal polyps according to the NBI features of polyp surfaces [6]. NICE classification addresses three features: color, vessels, and surface pattern of colorectal polyps (Table 12.3). Similar to pit patterns on chromoscopy, NICE classifications correlate well with the histological diagnosis of colorectal polyps. Most polyps classified as NICE type 1 are hyperplastic. Most conventional adenomas are NICE type 2, as are some early cancers of depth limited to the mucosa or superficial submucosa. NICE type 3 is indicative of deep submucosal cancer s with lymph node metastases (Fig. 12.5).
Table 12.3
NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classificationa
Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
Color | Same or lighter than background | Browner relative to background | Brown to dark brown relative to background; sometimes patchy whiter areas |
Vessels | None, or isolated lacy vessels may be present coursing across the lesion | Thick brown vessels surrounding white structures | Has area(s) with markedly distorted or missing vessels |
Surface pattern | Dark or white spots of uniform size, or homogenous absence of pattern | Oval, tubular, or branched white structures surrounded by brown vessels | Areas of distortion or absence of pattern |
Most likely pathology | Hyperplastic polyp | Adenoma | Deep submucosal cancer |
Fig. 12.5
NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification of colorectal polyps. (a) A diminutive polyp of NICE type 1, which was a hyperplastic polyp. (b) Small type Is polyp with NICE type 2, which was a tubular adenoma. (c) An approximately 12-mm sized NICE type 3 polyp, with final pathology of a submucosal cancer with invasion depth of 2500 μm
Many studies have evaluated the performance of NBI in the differential diagnosis of colorectal polyps. A meta-analysis showed that the pooled negative predictive value of NBI for adenomatous polyp histology was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88–94%) [7]. Moreover, the agreement in assignment of postpolypectomy surveillance intervals based on optical biopsy with NBI of colorectal polyps < 5 mm in size was 91% (95% CI, 86–95%) in academic settings and 92% (95% CI, 88–96%) when performed by experienced endoscopists [7]. However, when performed by inexperienced endoscopists and/or trainees, the performance of NBI was <90%, limiting its usefulness. In addition, NBI was less accurate in differentiating between types 2 and 3 (i.e., differentiating mucosal/superficial submucosal cancers and deep submucosal cancers) than for differentiating between types 1 and 2.