Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Right Colectomy
Brian T. Valerian
INDICATIONS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
Indications
The indications for hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) right hemicolectomy are predominantly the same as those for laparoscopic and open right hemicolectomy: benign and malignant processes that involve the distal terminal ileum, cecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, and proximal transverse colon. HAL offers surgeons the benefits of laparoscopic surgery including smaller incisions, less postoperative pain, shorter hospital length of stay, and more rapid return of bowel function while still allowing the surgeon tactile feedback provided with open surgery. Utilizing HAL, the hand can retract organs, dissect, and rapidly control bleeding.
HAL is more frequently used for left hemicolectomy or total colectomy and total proctocolectomy; it still offers advantages in certain situations for right-sided colectomies. Inflammation or friable tissues from inflammatory bowel disease, or thickened mesentery such as seen with Crohn’s disease are examples. A phlegmon from diverticular disease or inflammatory bowel disease or large bulky tumors or masses are other examples. Morbid obesity can make laparoscopic surgery challenging, but HAL can often allow for successful minimally invasive surgery to be performed. The hand can easily retract the colon or mesentery in an obese patient or aid with exposure that laparoscopic instruments may not be able to provide. HAL also allows palpation of a neoplasm within the colon, which may not be identified visually. The patients and procedures that gain the most benefit from HAL are those that require an extraction site or mini-laparotomy.
Specific indications for HAL right hemicolectomy include refractory Crohn’s disease, right-sided diverticular disease, colon polyps not amenable to endoscopic removal, malignancies and neoplasms, volvulus or cecal bascule, and arteriovenous malformations or other bleeding lesions.
Contraindications
Contraindications typically fall into two broad classifications—absolute and relative contraindications. Absolute contraindications are those general medical conditions that would preclude a minimally invasive approach that requires pneumoperitoneum such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe cardiac disease for which decreased venous return can be detrimental, inability to tolerate Trendelenburg position, hepatic disease, coagulopathy, and a moribund patient. Relative contraindications have decreased as surgeon experience and skill have increased. Morbid obesity, previous abdominal surgery, adhesions, and phlegmons are all relative contraindications, but skilled laparoscopic surgeons can often utilize minimally invasive techniques to safely complete operations in these patients. Early reports of port site metastasis in minimally invasive surgery for malignancy have been disproven, and multiple studies have shown that both HAL and laparoscopic surgery are safe and effective in patients with malignancies. There are certain other conditions that remain absolute or relative contraindications including bowel obstruction with massively dilated bowel and bowel perforation.
PREOPERATIVE PLANNING
A patient undergoing any colon surgery requires a complete evaluation. Patients being considered for minimally invasive techniques also require additional evaluations because the ability to palpate all abdominal structures such as the liver and peritoneal surfaces may be limited. Determining extent of disease involvement and localization of lesions, masses, and tumors facilitates surgery. Colonoscopy allows identification of polyps, tumors, masses, and lesions. Tattooing of smaller polyps and tumors or of flat lesions allows for visual identification at the time of surgery. India ink can be easily utilized to tattoo lesions by injecting in three or four quadrants around the lesion for future identification. Colonoscopy also ensures there are no other synchronous lesions throughout the remaining colon.
Preoperative imaging with computerized tomography allows for evaluation of local extent of disease and possible metastatic spread to other organs and structures in malignant lesions. In addition, it can help determine resectability and ensure there is no direct extension of lesions or invasion to adjacent structures, not only in malignant conditions but also in conditions such as Crohn’s disease.
In preparation for surgery, a patient’s suitability for surgery is determined. If the patient has any absolute contraindications to HAL, open surgery can be offered. The preoperative discussion and consent process must always include the possibility of conversion to an open procedure if it cannot be accomplished safely utilizing minimally invasive techniques. During the preoperative discussion, perioperative and postoperative expectations can be explained as well as risks, benefits, and alternatives. Managing perioperative expectations is paramount to good outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Standard mechanical bowel preparation is recommended because an empty colon is easier to manipulate and handle using minimally invasive techniques. The use of oral preoperative antibiotics is at the discretion of the surgeon. Prophylactic intravenous antibiotics at the time of surgery, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and perioperative initiatives and care are the same as those for any colectomy. Patients undergoing HAL colectomy are appropriate candidates for enhanced recovery protocols if those are utilized.
SURGERY
Positioning
The patient is placed supine on the operating room table. Other positions include modified low lithotomy position with the thighs at or slightly below the level of the hip to prevent interference with laparoscopic instrument mobility. Split leg positioners can also be utilized because these devices support the entire lower extremity, decreasing the chance of peroneal nerve injury and offer the surgeon access to stand between the legs should the need arise. The author’s preference is to place the patient in split leg position. A restraint device can be placed across the patient’s chest to help prevent slippage on the operating room table during manipulation of the table intraoperatively for positioning. The legs can be similarly secured if in split leg position. The left arm should be padded and tucked at the patient’s side. Pneumatic sequential compression devices are placed to reduce the risk of deep vein thrombosis. A bladder catheter is inserted to decompress the bladder intraoperatively. Orogastric decompression can be accomplished by the anesthesia team. The surgeon and assistant stand to the patient’s left and monitors are placed on the patient’s right side. One or more monitors can be used if available. The scrub technician stands to the patient’s right side (Fig. 6-1). Alternatively, the surgeon can stand between the patient’s legs with the assistant to the patient’s left side, while the scrub can remain on the patient’s right side.
Port Placement
Port placement and location of the hand-assist port vary based on patient anatomy, surgeon preference, and surgeon confidence in being able to complete the operation laparoscopically. Two options exist to initiate the operation—placement of a traditional laparoscopic port usually in the periumbilical location and then evaluation and placement of the hand-assist port or initial placement of the hand-assist port with subsequent laparoscopic port placement. The approach is often related to surgeon experience and certainty of the diagnosis.
Figure 6-2 demonstrates some of the more common ports and hand-assist device layouts. Parts A,B, and C demonstrate a 10- or 12-mm supraumbilical Hasson-type port with the hand-assist device in the right lower quadrant, vertical suprapubic location, and low transverse suprapubic location. An additional 5-mm port is placed in the left lower quadrant with the option to place an additional 5-mm
port in the midepigastrum if required to assist with dissection or retraction. Figure 6-2D illustrates the hand-assist device in the periumbilical location with two additional ports on the left side of the abdomen, one for the camera and one for a working port. The placement of the hand in the midline/periumbilical location allows the most surgical versatility, but the hand can obscure visualization. Current hand-assist devices allow easy insertion and removal of the hand into and out of the peritoneal cavity while maintaining pneumoperitoneum. The size of the incision required for the hand-assist device is typically the same as the glove size of the surgeon in centimeters. Once the location is chosen and the incision is made, the wound retractor/protector is placed and secured. The hand-assist port is then secured to the base. The use of surgical lubricant on the back of the surgeon’s gloved hand facilitates hand exchanges through the hand-assist port.
port in the midepigastrum if required to assist with dissection or retraction. Figure 6-2D illustrates the hand-assist device in the periumbilical location with two additional ports on the left side of the abdomen, one for the camera and one for a working port. The placement of the hand in the midline/periumbilical location allows the most surgical versatility, but the hand can obscure visualization. Current hand-assist devices allow easy insertion and removal of the hand into and out of the peritoneal cavity while maintaining pneumoperitoneum. The size of the incision required for the hand-assist device is typically the same as the glove size of the surgeon in centimeters. Once the location is chosen and the incision is made, the wound retractor/protector is placed and secured. The hand-assist port is then secured to the base. The use of surgical lubricant on the back of the surgeon’s gloved hand facilitates hand exchanges through the hand-assist port.