Gastric Bypass as a Revisional Procedure



Fig. 1.
Laparoscopic gastric band removal: gastrogastric stitches were cut.



A80020_2_En_30_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 2.
Laparoscopic gastric band removal: the band was gently freed by the adhesion.


A80020_2_En_30_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 3.
Laparoscopic gastric band removal: the band was cut and removed.


Despite good results in the first postoperative period, the restrictive procedures have several limitations such as gastric pouch dilation, intragastric migration, band slippage, and gastrogastric fistulas [710]. Furthermore, over time a number of patients have inadequate weight loss or weight regain [79].

These problems of restrictive procedures run parallel with a similar increase in revisional procedures. The revisional bariatric surgical procedures are mainly indicated for the development of an acute or chronic complication or a side effect of the primary bariatric procedure, metabolic and nutritional sequelae, or the absence of postoperative weight loss or weight regain after a successful period, untreatable with conservative approach [1117].

The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) during the last years gained wide consensus as one of the procedure of choice as revisional bariatric procedure after restrictive primary operations [8, 12, 16, 18, 19].


Preoperative Workup


The preoperative workup is the same with the multidisciplinary evaluation done for all the bariatric surgical procedure. During the workup the patient compliance to adhere to follow-up was also stated. Particular attention is due to recognize any band-related or previous gastric complication that can delay the time of the surgical approach for several days or more.


Surgical Procedure



Revisional Surgery After Vertical Banded Gastroplasty [18, 2026]


After clearing all adhesions, the gastric band is identified. In some cases with dense anterior adhesions, this may be facilitated by getting into the lesser sac and behind the stomach from the greater curve to first find the band in an area with less fibrosis and scarring. When possible, the gastroplasty vertical staple line is identified as well. A window must then be created into the lesser sac, on the lesser curve side of the stomach and proximal to the gastric band. The lesser curve neurovascular bundle should be preserved, and this window should be created as close to the gastric wall as possible. Once this dissection is complete, a linear stapler with a thick tissue cartridge is fired transversely on the gastric pouch and fundus proximal to the band. An esophageal bougie (38–42 French) is passed until it abuts the newly created proximal transverse staple line. The bougie is maneuvered as close as possible to the lesser curve of the pouch, and a linear stapler is fired multiple times until the new gastric pouch is completely isolated and divided from the remnant stomach. It is important to avoid crossing the original gastroplasty staple line when creating the pouch. By crossing staple lines and incorporating tissue of vastly different thicknesses in the same staple line, the potential for staple line failure increases. There is an additional possibility of leaving a small cuff of stomach on either the remnant stomach or the gastric pouch that does not communicate with either lumen. For this reason, it is mandatory to stay very close to lesser curve bougie and typically resect the fundus of the remnant stomach along with the band and the original staple lines. For open cases, a hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy, using absorbable sutures, was performed. In laparoscopic cases, the gastrojejunostomy is created by passing the anvil to a 25-mm circular stapler (DST Series™ EEA™ OrVil 25-mm device, Covidien, Norwalk, CT) transorally. Several experiences reported the same limb length as in primary LRYGB: a 50-cm biliopancreatic limb and a 100- or 150-cm Roux limb, depending on the patient’s BMI.


Revisional Surgery After LAGB [8, 16, 19, 2629]


After band deflation the first step is to identify the gastric band and its orientation. The fibrous tissue that covers the band is removed, and the port-connection tube is cut and pulled out of the abdomen. Then the band is sectioned, freed by the remaining adhesions, and gently extracted into a port. The gastric bypass can be performed during the same laparoscopic session or after several weeks according to both the surgeons’ experience and patients’ conditions.

The patient is positioned in the reverse Trendelenburg lithotomy position. A closed carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum is created, and 6 trocars (5 of 12 mm and 1 of 5 mm) are inserted. The balloon gastric bougie (Inamed-Allergan) is placed transorally in the stomach and inflated with 30 mL of a saline solution, and the stomach is retracted backward by the anesthesiologist to reach the cardioesophageal junction. Dissection is started at its equator in the perigastric space between the neurovascular bundle of Latarjet and the lesser curvature of the stomach using the harmonic scalpel (Ultracision, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH). The retrogastric space is entered, and gastric transection performed by multiple linear staples fired in sequence up to the angle of His. The 30–45 Endocutter (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) and 35-, 45-, and 60-mm Endo GIA (US Surgical, Tyco Healthcare) were used interchangeably when available and as required. The flip-top anvil of a 25-mm circular stapler (CEEA, US Surgical, Tyco Healthcare) is advanced transorally into and through the proximal gastric pouch using a modified nasogastric tube anvil apparatus. The Roux limb is constructed by transecting the small bowel 40–60 cm from the ligament of Treitz. A jejunotomy on the alimentary limb is created, and the circular stapler is introduced transabdominally and advanced into the lumen of the jejunum to create an antecolic, antegastric end-to-side gastrojejunostomy. The jejunotomy is closed with a 60-mm linear stapler. The presence of a gastrojejunostomy leak is tested by injecting 40–60 mL of methylene blue through the nasogastric tube previously positioned into the temporarily clamped alimentary limb. A side-to-side jejunojejunostomy is performed with a 45-mm linear stapler through a jejunotomy 100–150 cm distal to the gastrojejunostomy. The anastomosis is completed using 2-0 polydioxanone continuous suture (LAPRA-TY, Johnson & Johnson, Cincinnati, OH).

The closure of the Peterson space with nonabsorbable stitches is routine. Also, drainage of the gastroenteroanastomosis and enteroenteroanastomosis is done in all cases.

Some authors have described a new technique with band left in situ and the small bowel anastomosed with the stomach above the band.


Redo Timing


The question of performing a revisional procedure from gastric banding to gastric bypass in one or two steps is controversial. The authors supporting the two-step approach indicate mainly technical reasons due to tissue quality and adhesions [12]. A two-step approach is also indicated in case of LapBand complications as intragastric migration or gastric pouch dilation because of the difficulty in finding adequate and healthy gastric tissue for the gastrojejunostomy. There are some reports suggesting that stricture rates are higher when the anastomosis is created to thick, scarred gastric tissue [19, 30].

The authors who support the single-step approach suggest that it is preferable because it avoids weight regain during the time between the band removal and the revisional bypass and avoids a second general anesthesia [11, 19, 30]. Moreover the fibrosis resulting from gastric band seems not to influence the technical results if the band is totally deflated 1 month before the conversion and if the fibrous band on the stomach is totally excised.


Results of Revisional LRYGB After VBG and LAGB



Vertical Banded Gastroplasty


Vertical banded gastroplasty was the most popular bariatric procedure in the 1980s and early 1990s. It was largely abandoned owing to the poor long-term weight loss results and the high rate of complications requiring revisional bariatric surgery. The most common causes of failure of vertical banded gastroplasty requiring a redo surgery were the dehiscence of the staple line, a switch to a wrong eating pattern with concomitant weight regain, pouch dilation, and intractable gastroesophageal reflux [11]. In two studies with patients followed for 10 years or more, a high rate of revisional procedure was reported. Marsk and colleagues observed that after a mean follow-up of 3 years almost 21 % of VBG-operated patients had required a revisional surgery either for insufficient weight loss or complications [22]. For the same reasons, Belsiger and colleagues in 10 years reported the rate of 17 % of revisional procedure [21]. The conversion in LRYGB was considered by most authors to be the most suitable procedure. Shouten and colleagues found that weight loss following VBG conversion to LRYGB was highly dependent on the indications for revision with better results in patients with insufficient weight loss [23]. Several other experiences confirm this observation. Gagné and colleagues reported that laparoscopic conversion of VBG in LRYGBP was feasible with acceptable weight loss, but the rate of surgical complication was high (38 %) [1618, 20].


Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding


The results of redo LRYGB are largely studied in LAGB. Ardestani and colleagues compared band revision versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion [27]. After laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, they observed that patients who have experienced successful weight loss with LAGB with band complications will have satisfactory outcomes with band revisions (i.e., band repositioning) maintaining the excess weight loss. Patients with inadequate weight loss with LAGB after conversion to LRYGB can experience better weight loss. Other authors have suggested that revisional procedure is less effective than primary LRYGBP [31, 32].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 13, 2017 | Posted by in ABDOMINAL MEDICINE | Comments Off on Gastric Bypass as a Revisional Procedure

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access