for Robotic Surgery


BMI <20 or >30

Diabetes mellitus

Limited physical mobility

Age over 70 years

Malnutrition

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease

Smoking and COPD

Anatomical abnormality

Pre-existing neuropathies




Table 2
Procedure-related risks for positioning injuries











Lengthy procedures (>3 h)

Interventions performed in the lithotomy position

Interventions performed in the steep Trendelenburg position




Trendelenburg Position (Head Down)


Many lower abdominal robotic surgeries need a steep Trendelenburg position , but the whole surgical team must be concerned with the physiological consequences. The classic Trendelenburg position was initially described with the torso supine and the legs upon the shoulders of an assistant with 45° head-down tilt. However, the term is now often used to describe any head-down position, including the steep Trendelenburg used for laparoscopic and robotic surgery [12]. In the steep position the patient must be stabilized at the surgical table not to slide down. A gel mattress or a vacuum mattress can be used to help sliding avoidance at the surgical table in the steep position [10]. The Trendelenburg position is associated with reduced total lung capacity, compliance, and increased airway pressures. Lung volume approaches closing capacity with resultant atelectasis and shunt. The endotracheal tube can be displaced with the table movement so the ventilation must be periodically checked for selective intubation. Many complications may be associated with this position because nondangerous complications such as light facial edema or more dangerous complications such as facial and airway edema may lead to respiratory distress in some cases [13]. Regarding hemodynamics the Trendelenburg position associated with the pneumoperitoneum is associated with elevation of pulmonary arterial pressure and central venous pressure and cardiac index decrease by as much as 50% [14, 15]. There are also some reports of visual loss after the steep Trendelenburg position associated with posterior ischemic optic neuropathy [16]. Intraocular pressure (IOP) is increased in the steep Trendelenburg position and the increase is time related. In general, robotic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position appears to pose little or no risk from IOP increases in patients without pre-existing ocular disease [17], but there may be additional risks for patients with glaucoma. Unfortunately there are no current guidelines for monitoring and preparing patients with glaucoma undergoing surgical procedures, but there are some successful cases described [18].

It remains to be elucidated whether the Trendelenburg position increases intracranial pressure (ICP). It’s well known that the head-down tilt increases central venous pressure and impairs venous drainage of the head. Other factors that can be involved with possible increase in ICP is the elevated impedance of drainage of the lumbar venous system secondary to the elevated intra-abdominal pressure, that may decrease reabsorption of cerebrospinal fluid. Chin et al. evaluated sonographic optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) to identify ICP. Their study did not definitively prove that there is a rise in ICP with the steep Trendelenburg position, but proposes that the ONSD provides a better understanding of the effect of the transient steep Trendelenburg position [19].


Reverse Trendelenburg Position (Head up)


The reverse Trendelenburg position is used in the upper abdominal laparoscopic and robotic surgeries. Regarding respiratory function this position can increase residual functional capacity and avoid collapse of the inferior area of the lungs. The patient will have an increased venous return and must be prepared to tolerate this fluid challenge [1]. Sliding on the surgical table can also occur in the reverse position and the same caution must be taken.


Arms and Legs Positioning


Depending on the procedure, the arms can be alongside the body with limited access for the anesthesiologist, thus the venous access and also monitors such as arterial line and pulse oxymeter must be well positioned and correctly functioning before the beginning of the surgery. Some precautions are also important to avoid brachial plexus injury. The head must be in neutral position to stretch the brachial plexus and the occiput must be protected; if possible the head must be slightly moved in order not to have prolonged pressure at the same point because such pressure can cause postoperative alopecia [20]. Arm boards can be used and it is preferred to tuck the arms to the patient’s sides with the palms facing the thighs, avoiding abduction, external rotation, or extension of the arms. The patient must be stabilzed at the surgical table and to avoid stretching the brachial plexus and acromium a cross-chest strap technique can be used as described by Shveiky et al. [20]. The cross-chest strap technique uses two straps of foam material placed over the acromio-clavicular joint level and the contralateral breast. Each strap is secured to the table with wide tape, without any pressure on the shoulders.

In some surgeries the legs must be spread and positioned at holders that must be padded and at the same height. The adequate positioning is not easy, especially in obese patients, so sufficient personnel are necessary to prevent lumbosacral injury and hyperflexion of the hips. Another important precaution when the arms are along the body and the legs at holders is to watch out for the position of the fingers to prevent crush injury when moving the leg holders [10].


Specific Aspects for Different Procedures



Prostatectomy


Robotic prostatectomy is nowadays the most commonly performed robotic surgery. The blood loss with the technique may vary but stays around 150–250 mL and the surgical time depends on the surgeon’s experience, but can be very fast in experienced hands, performed in 2–2.5 h. Regarding anesthesia the main concerns in robot-assisted prostatectomy are related to the positioning: the steep Trendelenburg position with the legs spread and the feet higher than the head. The arms stay alongside the body and the hands must be carefully positioned and protected [21]. Once the surgery starts, access to the patient is very limited, so all monitors and venous access must be completely safe and functional before the beginning of the procedure. Usually a large bore peripheral catheter is enough for fluid replacement, including cases with unintentional vascular accidents that may happen. Blood loss is normally minimal, however, the required fluid reposition is not small. Usually 1,500–2,000 mL are required to avoid postoperative oliguria, but the fluid reposition has to have adequate timing in order not to make the surgical approach of the anastomosis difficult due to intraoperative urine formation [22]. Postoperative analgesia can be provided with systemic opioids or even with regional anesthesia [23].


Intra-Abdominal Procedures


Regarding abdominal robotic procedures some specific issues may be important to consider. Nitrous oxide should be avoided to minimize bowel distension and possibly reduce postoperative pain related to it [24]. Another important consideration is neuromuscular blockade that is mandatory for patient safety and also to improve surgical conditions. Regarding neuromuscular blockade level, there is no evidence to support deep compared with moderate neuromuscular block [25] . Monitoring is related to the surgical procedure and patient condition, not the surgical approach. Fluid responsiveness is a challenge and may be difficult in some surgeries, such as robotic esophagectomy. Traditional clinical indicators are unreliable to guide fluid reposition [26]. Fluid reposition influences postoperative outcomes after abdominal surgery, and is a point for major attention for the anesthetist. Restrictive fluid therapy improves outcome after major gastrointestinal surgery, avoiding bowel edema formation [27].


Thoracic Surgery


Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has impaired vision and restricted maneuverability of surgical instruments, thus they often require the use of lung isolation techniques. The anesthesiologist must be skilled in these techniques including the use of double lumen tubes and bronchial blockers. Double lumen tubes are the most often used technique [28]. The whole surgical team must know that positioning may alter tube positioning, therefore the lung isolation must be checked after positioning and before starting the surgery. In robotic surgery once the robot is docked, it does not allow changes in patient position on the operating room table, another important reason to check lung isolation after positioning. If the patient is expected not to be extubated immediately after the surgery, the use of bronchial blockers may be strongly considered to prevent tube exchange, which may predispose the patient to complications with airway management [29].

Lobectomy is one of the most frequent pulmonary robotic surgeries. Patients undergoing robot-assisted thoracic lobectomy must have an arterial line due to the restricted access and the potential intraoperative complications [28]. The anesthesiologist must always be ready to the possibilty of conversion to open thoracotomy. The rate of conversion may be higher if lung isolation is lost, so the correct isolation technique and bronchoscopic evaluation are required skills for the anesthesiology team [30]. Postoperative analgesia may be a challenge, mostly related to the chest tubes. The most intense postoperative pain is in the first 48 h. Different techniques including regional anesthesia or systemic medications may provide high-quality analgesia [31].


Transoral Surgery


The main advantages of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in patients with head and neck cancer are access to anatomical sites not accessible conventionally, absence of a neck incision, absence or decreased duration of tracheotomy, absence or decreased duration of nasogastric or gastric feeding tube, and decreased length of hospital stay [32]. If indicated, some surgeons perform neck dissection in the same surgery and others do it after 1 or 2 weeks. In the second option anesthesiologists must be twice worried about airway management: edema and fibrosis may be present after the previous surgery, many times added to previous adjuvant radio- and chemotherapy.

Airway management in TORS is also a challenge, mainly in extubation. Safe extubation techniques may be employed in cases where tracheotomy is not performed. Some of the techniques that can be employed include the use of a laryngeal mask airway, to guarantee airway patency, called the Bailey maneuver [33]. Another option is the use of tube exchange catheters . They are semi-rigid, long, thin, radio-opaque catheters with holes in their distal-blind tips. If extubation fails, it can be used as a guide to reintubate the patient. An advantage of this device is the ability to oxygenate the patient through the distal aperture with jet ventilation [34]. However, barotrauma and fatal complications of oxygen insufflation and jet ventilation have been reported [35].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 26, 2018 | Posted by in ABDOMINAL MEDICINE | Comments Off on for Robotic Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access