High-resolution manometry (HRM) has advanced the understanding of esophageal peristaltic mechanisms and has simplified esophageal motor testing. In this article the technical aspects of HRM are addressed, focusing on test protocols, in addition to concerns and pitfalls in performing esophageal motor studies. Specifically, catheter positioning, equipment-related artifacts, basal data acquisition, adequate swallows, and provocative maneuvers are discussed.
Key points
- •
High-resolution manometry (HRM) affords easier identification of anatomic landmarks and esophageal motor patterns, shorter duration of procedures, uniform analysis parameters, and better comprehension for learners in comparison with conventional manometry.
- •
HRM is used to evaluate esophageal motor function in patients with esophageal symptoms unexplained after endoscopy or contrast studies, to assess esophageal peristalsis before foregut surgery, and to localize the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) for placement of pH and pH-impedance catheters.
- •
Aberrancies in catheter positioning, such as failure to traverse the LES or the diaphragm, and equipment-related artifacts, such as thermal drift or sensor malfunction, should be recognized and rectified appropriately.
- •
The technician performing the HRM study needs to be able to reassure the patient, identify esophageal landmarks and motor patterns, understand critical and noncritical imperfections, and modify the study accordingly.
Introduction
Esophageal manometry consists of measurement of pressure events in the esophagus following test swallows, represented as timing and amplitude of pressure events. Esophageal intraluminal pressures are converted to an electrical signal that can be recorded, amplified, and displayed as pressure tracings at each recording location along the esophagus. Initial conventional manometry systems consisted of an array of unidirectional recording sites distributed at predefined locations along the length of a catheter placed in the esophageal lumen. Line tracings of pressure events were displayed in a stacked format from proximal to distal esophagus, and proximal stomach. The characteristics of the pressure events designated whether the esophageal body, an esophageal sphincter, or the gastric baseline was addressed by each recording site.
High-resolution manometry (HRM) represents a paradigm shift from conventional manometry in that multiple circumferential pressure sensors are used and topographic plots of esophageal pressure data are generated. These plots can be viewed as colored contour maps on which each color represents a pressure value. The close spacing of sensors allows better sampling of esophageal intraluminal pressures as a continuum throughout the esophagus and its sphincters, rather than as point samples at predefined distances as used with conventional manometry. Computerized software programs fill points in between pressure recordings with best-fit data to create smooth color-contour plots of esophageal peristalsis, now uniformly termed Clouse plots in honor of Ray Clouse who pioneered the technology ( Fig. 1 ). Advantages of HRM over conventional manometry include easier identification of anatomic landmarks, shorter duration of data acquisition, more specific assessment of sphincter function, and easier recognition of motor patterns.
Indications and contraindications
HRM represents the test of choice to evaluate esophageal motor function. The primary value of HRM remains the identification of esophageal outflow obstruction from a motor process such as achalasia. The benefit stems primarily from the fact that software tools have been designed to extract nadir pressures during expected lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation during a test swallow. Of these, the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), which extracts 4 seconds of continuous or discontinuous nadir pressure, performs the best. The sensitivity of IRP as an HRM tool for the diagnosis of achalasia has been well documented in comparisons with point-pressure sensors and sleeve sensors. In addition, motor mechanisms involved in postfundoplication dysphagia can be evaluated using HRM.
HRM is frequently performed for assessment of esophageal symptoms not fully explained by endoscopic or radiologic studies ( Box 1 ). Both hypermotility disorders (spastic processes such as distal esophageal spasm or jackhammer esophagus) and hypomotility disorders (aperistalsis, frequent failed peristalsis) may be identified in these settings. HRM assessment of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) may complement other modalities of assessment of pharyngeal and proximal esophageal peristalsis and function. The most frequent use of esophageal manometry is in localization of the proximal border of the LES for placement of pH and pH-impedance probes.
Indications
Transit symptoms (dysphagia, regurgitation) with no structural process identified on endoscopy and/or barium contrast studies
Abnormal esophageal emptying identified on endoscopy and/or barium contrast studies
Esophageal symptoms (chest pain, regurgitation, heartburn) with no structural explanation and no benefit from empiric acid suppression
Transit symptoms following foregut surgery, especially fundoplication
Transit symptoms following bariatric procedures, especially laparoscopic band placement
Localization of the lower esophageal sphincter for placement of pH and pH-impedance probes
Assessment of esophageal peristaltic function before fundoplication
Dysphagia localized to the proximal esophagus and upper esophageal sphincter
Contraindications
Absolute
Esophageal obstruction from an infiltrating process such as a tumor
Abnormal nasal passages preventing catheter insertion
Abnormal oropharyngeal anatomy
Frank aspiration with water swallows (dry swallows can be obtained)
Significantly abnormal coagulation parameters
Relative
Patients on chronic anticoagulation (anticoagulants can be held for 3–5 days)
Inability to swallow on command (dry swallows can be obtained)
Inability to tolerate the catheter (catheter can be sometimes placed at endoscopy, while sedated, if procedure is absolutely necessary)
High-grade oropharyngeal or esophageal obstruction from a structural process could preclude placement of the motility catheter, and constitute an absolute contraindication to esophageal motor testing. Patients on chronic anticoagulation are generally asked to hold their anticoagulants for 3 to 5 days because of the risk for epistaxis. The indication for the procedure should be carefully assessed in patients with profound disorders of coagulation and those with significant risk of aspiration (although dry swallows could be obtained in the latter setting). Other indications and contraindications for esophageal manometry are summarized in Box 1 .
The procedure
Equipment Preparation
HRM catheters are made by several manufacturers, and can be either solid-state or water-perfused. Manufacturer instructions need to be followed for catheter calibration before initiation of the study. Water-perfused catheters need to be flushed with degassed water, and pressure measurements calibrated to the zero position, which is, the level of the esophagus with the patient lying on the stretcher. With solid-state catheters, pressure calibration is performed before each study by applying known pressure to pressure sensors to ensure pressure readings are accurate; this is typically an automated process using a pressurized chamber into which the catheter is inserted. Because solid-state sensors can be affected by temperature, intermittent calibration using a water bath at 37°C is recommended, so that a pressure correction can be calculated for pressures recorded at body temperature when calibration is performed at room temperature. This thermal compensation is applied at the end of the procedure.
Supplies needed for esophageal manometry include syringes with distilled or tap water for test swallows, a cup with a drinking straw containing water, a kidney tray and towels in case the patient retches or vomits, cotton-tipped swabs, KY jelly for catheter lubrication, lidocaine jelly for topical anesthesia of the nasal passages, and tape for securing the catheter after intubation. If viscous or solid boluses are to be administered, appropriate food items (eg, viscous jelly, yogurt, bread, marshmallows) need to be at hand.
Some manufacturers of HRM catheters recommend using a protective sheath over the solid-state catheter to simplify disinfection protocols between procedures; these cannot be used with catheters containing impedance sensors.
Patient Preparation
Esophageal manometry is best performed in a well-lit room with a comfortable ambience. The patient changes into a gown that covers the chest and torso. Preprocedure symptom questionnaires and requisition forms are completed as the catheter and equipment are readied. The HRM operator first explains the procedure to the patient, and describes why the procedure is being performed. The operator reassures and engages the patient, describes what the patient can expect, and uses distractive measures in case there is oropharyngeal discomfort or gagging. Knowledge of anatomic abnormalities, such as hiatal hernia, suspicion of a dilated esophagus, and prior foregut surgery, may assist in preparing for and performing the procedure.
Patients should have nothing to eat or drink for at least 6 hours (clear liquids for 2–3 days may be needed if achalasia is suspected) before the HRM study to prevent aspiration of gastric or esophageal contents. Medications that affect esophageal motility (caffeine-containing medications, prokinetics, nitrates, calcium-channel blockers, anticholinergics, opiates, and tricyclic antidepressants) are best avoided whenever possible, and should be decided on a case-by-case basis in the context of the clinical indication for the study and potential impact on patient management. Allergies to analgesics must be documented, as topical anesthesia with lidocaine spray and/or viscous lidocaine is used in the nasal passages in many centers to minimize discomfort and maximize the success of nasal intubation.
Patient Positioning
The esophageal motility catheter is best inserted with patients sitting upright and facing the operator. The head is tilted up slightly to allow the operator to visualize the nasal passages before insertion. After adequate positioning of the catheter, the patient is asked to lie down in a supine position, as esophageal peristalsis is traditionally assessed without the effect of gravity on bolus transit. Furthermore, with conventional manometry using pneumohydraulic pumps, pressure needed to be zeroed to the position of the catheter, which required a horizontal position. The head end of the bed is typically tilted upward by 10° to 15°, and the patient is asked to lean slightly to the left to assist with swallowing of water boluses that are squirted into the mouth.
Upright patient positioning is now possible using HRM, as zeroing of pressure to patient position is not necessary. The upright, seated position may be better tolerated by patients with severe esophageal dysmotility, thereby minimizing the risk of regurgitation and aspiration in comparison with the supine position. Normative upright pressure values exist, and have been compared with the supine position. Peristalsis is more coordinated and vigorous, with a slower contraction front velocity in the supine position. Motor diagnoses are reported to be generally concordant in more than 70% of cases between supine and upright positions; discordant cases were mostly accounted for by an excess of hypomotility disorders in the upright position. However, numeric reduction in IRP and contraction vigor is seen in the sitting position, with others reporting reclassification of esophageal outflow obstruction in approximately 10%, leading some investigators to suggest performing up to 5 swallows in the upright position in most patients.
Catheter Insertion
A cup containing water, with a straw for sipping, is provided to the patient, as swallowing of water during catheter advancement reduces patient discomfort. The catheter tip is lubricated and passed through the nasal passages with the chin tilted slightly upward. When the patient feels the catheter at the back of the throat, the neck can be flexed and the catheter inserted into the esophagus while the patient takes small sips of water to maintain relaxation of the UES and, subsequently, the LES. Having patients open their mouths, watch the Clouse plots on the screen, or squeeze a soft ball can help focus attention away from discomfort or gagging.
Catheter Positioning
When properly positioned, the HRM catheter extends from the pharynx to the stomach, with at least 1 sensor in the pharynx and 3 sensors in the stomach. In the normal setting, the UES and LES/esophagogastric junction (EGJ) are visible as 2 bands of pressure ( Fig. 2 ). The HRM operator is trained in identification of anatomic landmarks, including the UES, LES, and diaphragmatic crural impression. The diaphragmatic crural impression together with the LES constitutes the EGJ. The location of the diaphragmatic crura can be assessed by identifying pressure inversion with respiration; intrathoracic pressure is more negative during inspiration, whereas intra-abdominal pressure is more negative during expiration (see Fig. 2 ). If the diaphragmatic crural impression is not easily identified, the patient can be asked to take a deep breath, which will magnify these pressure changes. If the EGJ is not traversed by the HRM catheter, these pressure changes with breathing will not be seen; instead, a “butterfly” or mirror image may be seen, indicating that the catheter is curled up in the esophagus and requires repositioning ( Fig. 3 ). Separation between the LES and diaphragmatic crura indicates the presence of a hiatus hernia.
If a pressurization pattern is seen that extends from the contraction front all the way to the bottom of the screen, air may be present in the catheter sheath if the Given HRM system is being used. The operator should remove the catheter and replace the sheath if the tracing looks unusual.
An inability to traverse the LES is a critical imperfection that needs to be recognized by the HRM operator in real time. Although this difficulty occurs most often in achalasia, the diagnosis of achalasia may still be made with similar frequency (up to 94%) as with perfect studies if the clinical context and other tests are reviewed. Straightening and lengthening the esophagus by asking the patient to stand up, repositioning the catheter, or having the patient gulp water (which may allow the LES to relax) may help maneuver the catheter through the LES. Regardless, several maneuvers can be used to attempt to traverse the LES ( Box 2 ).
- •
Catheter is advanced with patient standing up
- •
The patient raises arms above the head
- •
A 45° to 90° twist is applied counterclockwise on the catheter
- •
The patient takes repeated gulps of water
- •
The catheter is placed under endoscopic guidance
By contrast, not traversing the diaphragmatic crura is a noncritical imperfection. This difficulty typically occurs with large hiatal hernias. In this setting, if the LES is traversed there remains a small risk that LES metrics may be inaccurate if there is pressure compartmentalization within the hiatal hernia. However, esophageal body peristalsis and LES function can typically be ascertained adequately. Insertion with the patient standing up may assist with traversing the diaphragm, as the hiatus hernia may reduce in this position. Alternatively, placing the HRM catheter under endoscopic guidance can be considered.
Once the resting pressures generated by the UES and LES are identified, the catheter is fixed in place by taping to the nose, and the patient is allowed to accommodate to the HRM catheter before initiating the study. This interval avoids artificial elevations of resting UES pressure and repeated dry swallowing.