Enhanced Elimination of Poisons

Key points

  • Treatment of poisonings includes aggressive supportive care and consideration of antidotes, gastrointestinal decontamination, and elimination enhancement techniques.

  • Characteristics that favor elimination of a poison with extracorporeal treatments include a small molecular size, low volume of distribution, low protein binding, and low plasma clearance.

  • The anion and osmol gaps are crucial in the diagnosis and management of toxic alcohol poisonings.

  • Of all the extracorporeal treatments available, hemodialysis is the most available, least expensive, most efficient (in terms of blood clearance), and associated with the lowest incidence of complications.

  • For almost all cases for which an extracorporeal treatment is indicated, intermittent hemodialysis is the preferred option.

Poisonings are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. According to the National Poison Data System compiled by the American Association of Poison Control Centers, more than 2 million human poisonings were reported in the United States in 2021. The classes of poisons accounting for the majority of fatal cases were sedatives, hypnotics, antipsychotics, cardiovascular agents, opioids, stimulants, and other recreational drugs. Table 66.1 shows the 2021 U.S. statistics of the incidence and outcomes related to various poisons that may require the care of a nephrologist.

Table 66.1

American Association of Poison Control Centers’ Statistics for Exposures of Common Dialyzable Poisons (2021)

Poison Total Exposures a Deaths
Acetaminophen 137,021 223
Baclofen 4620 11
Barbiturates 1331 3
Carbamazepine 2194 0
Ethylene glycol 6474 20
Gabapentin 20,887 5
Isopropanol 14,706 1
Lithium 6332 10
Metformin (Biguanides) 9198 18
Methanol 2228 5
Paraquat 132 1
Phenytoin 1369 2
Salicylates 30,587 26
Theophylline 141 2
Valproic acid 6908 2

All acute exposures to potential poisons should be considered life-threatening until a complete risk assessment has been performed. The general approach to the poisoned patient necessitates prompt resuscitation and stabilization, clinical and laboratory evaluation, antidote administration, and gastrointestinal decontamination if appropriate. Antidotes can act at a receptor (e.g., nalaxone for opioid poisoning), inhibit metabolism (e.g., fomepizole for toxic alcohol poisoning), or bind to inactivate the poison (e.g., deferoxamine for iron poisoning). Some antidotes can be removed by extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs), such as ethanol or fomepizole, requiring an increased dose during ECTR, or may need to be repeated, as in the case of idarucizumab in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). Table 66.2 illustrates some of the most common antidotes used in the toxicology setting.

Table 66.2

Common Antidotes Used in Treatment of Poisonings

Poison Antidote
Acetaminophen (paracetamol) N-acetylcysteine
Amanita Phalloides Silibilin, a penicillin G
Anticholinergic drugs Physostigmine for significant delirium
Anticholinesterase insecticides Atropine and possibly pralidoxime or obidoxime
Benzodiazepines Flumazenil
β-adrenergic antagonists Adrenaline, insulin-dextrose infusion
Calcium channel blockers Calcium, insulin-dextrose infusion
Carbon monoxide Oxygen
Cyanide Hydroxocobalamin and/or thiosulfate
Dabigatran Idarucizumab
Digoxin Digoxin Fab antitoxin, atropine
Envenomation (e.g., snake and spider) Antivenom
Ethylene glycol/methanol Ethanol or fomepizole
Heparin Protamine sulfate
Iron Deferoxamine
Isoniazid Pyridoxine
Lead Ca,Na 2 -EDTA, or succimer (dimercaptosuccinic acid [DMSA])
Mercury DMSA or DMPS
Methotrexate Folinic acid, glucarpidase
Nitrates, nitrites Methylene blue
Opioids Naloxone
Poison-induced methemoglobinemia (e.g., dapsone, and nitrites) Methylene blue
Salicylates Bicarbonate
Sulfonylureas Octreotide, glucose
Tricyclic antidepressants Bicarbonate
Valproic acid L-carnitine
Warfarin Vitamin K

A minority of poisonings can benefit from treatments that actively enhance elimination. Activated charcoal (50 g in adults) is the preferred method of decontamination ; it is usually administered within 2 hours of ingestion and may be repeated for modified release and enteric-coated drugs. Contraindications include an altered level of consciousness with an unprotected airway, seizures, protracted vomiting, and impaired intestinal function (obstruction or ileus). Complications are rare and include aspiration, appendicitis, and bowel obstruction. Whole bowel irrigation removes poisons from the intestines (e.g., administration of a polyethylene glycol [macrogol] electrolyte solution [1–2 L/hour]) until the rectal effluent is clear. Whole bowel irrigation may be considered in massive ingestions of modified release drugs (e.g., salicylate), poisons not adsorbed by charcoal (e.g., iron or lithium), or illicit drugs in body packers.

Elimination enhancement modalities can be divided between corporeal treatments and ECTRs, which require an artificial device located outside the body. Expert recommendations endorsed by international toxicology and nephrology societies are available for corporeal treatments , and ECTR ( https://www.extrip-workgroup.org/ ). Physicians must know the physicochemical characteristics, clinical effects, and pharmacokinetics of the poisons to estimate their removal by any technique. This chapter reviews the concepts of poison elimination, elimination enhancement modalities, and poisons requiring the expertise of nephrologists. Fig. 66.1 presents elimination enhancement trends for poisonings in the United States.

Fig. 66.1

Frequency of various elimination enhancement techniques used in the United States from 1983 to 2021.

ECTR, Extracorporeal treatment; MDAC, multiple-dose activated charcoal.

Overview of Corporeal Treatments for Enhanced Elimination of Poisons

Forced Diuresis

The goal of forced diuresis is to induce a urine output that exceeds physiologic flow (≥4–5 mL/kg/h) to enhance renal elimination of poisons. Historically, forced diuresis is performed through volume expansion with isotonic fluids (0.9% NaCl or lactated Ringer solution), with or without concomitant diuretics. Results of early studies failed to show significant benefits. Forced diuresis is also associated with complications such as volume overload, pulmonary edema, cerebral edema, and electrolyte disturbances. At present, forced diuresis is never recommended in the management of acute poisonings. However, aggressive volume repletion remains warranted for some poisons to correct hypotension and/or overcome proximal tubular reabsorption of some offending xenobiotics (e.g., lithium) during volume contraction.

Urinary Alkalinization

Urinary alkalinization is based on the concept of “ion trapping.” The goal of manipulating urinary pH is to ionize the poison, which decreases passive reabsorption, as ionized particles are less lipid soluble. The ionized poison becomes “trapped” in the tubule lumen and is eliminated in the urine. The dissociation of a weak acid or base into its ionized state is determined by its dissociation constant (pK a ) (i.e., the pH at which it is 50% ionized and 50% nonionized). For example, for salicylic acid (pK a of 3), when the urinary pH is 3, salicylate exists in a 1:1 ratio of ionized to nonionized forms. At a pH of 7.4, this ratio increases to 20,000:1 and promotes urine excretion.

The clinical efficacy of urine alkalinization depends on the relative contribution of kidney clearance to the total body clearance of active poison. If only 1% of the ingested poison is excreted unchanged in the urine, even a 10-fold increase in renal elimination will have no clinically significant effect. Criteria that determine whether a poison is amenable to urinary alkalinization are: 1) it is eliminated unchanged by the kidneys, 2) it is not strongly bound to plasma proteins, 3) it is distributed primarily in the extracellular fluid compartment, and 4) it is a weak acid (i.e., pK a between 3 and 7).” Urine alkalinization enhances the excretion of salicylates, phenobarbital, methotrexate, and other poisons ( Table 66.3 ).

Table 66.3

Poisons Whose Elimination may be Enhanced by Corporeal Techniques

Urine Alkalinization Multiple-Dose Activated Charcoal Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate Prussian Blue
Chlorophenoxy herbicides ( 2,4-D, MCPA, MCPP ) a
Chlorpropamide
Diflunisal
Fluoride
Methotrexate
Phenobarbital
Salicylates
Amatoxins (Amanita phalloides)
Carbamazepine
Colchicine
Dapsone
Digoxin
Phenobarbital
Phenytoin
Quinine
Salicylates
Theophylline
Yellow oleander
Lithium
Potassium
Radiocesium
Thallium

Sodium bicarbonate is administered as an intravenous bolus of 100 to 150 mL of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate in one liter of 5% dextrose in water. This solution is given at up to 200 mL/hour according to the clinical status. Contraindications include severe kidney disease and pulmonary and cerebral edema. Serum electrolytes and urinary pH are monitored every 2 to 4 hours, targeting a urine pH between 7.5 and 8.5 while maintaining a serum pH below 7.55. Complications include hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, hypernatremia, pulmonary and cerebral edema, and metabolic alkalosis. Normokalemia is required for effective urine alkalinization; in hypokalemia, potassium is reabsorbed in exchange for hydrogen, so the nephron is unable to produce alkaline urine and the patient can develop alkalemia. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (e.g., acetazolamide) are never recommended as they alkalinize urine but generate metabolic acidemia, which increases the proportion of the poison unionized in the blood, favoring intracellular distribution and increasing toxicity.

Fecal Elimination Enhancement

Multiple-dose activated charcoal (MDAC) can enhance elimination of certain poisons. Properties of poisons amenable to MDAC include a low intrinsic clearance, a small volume of distribution (V D ), and a prolonged half-life. MDAC promotes the clearance of poisons by interrupting their enterohepatic circulation, promoting passive diffusion down a concentration gradient from the intestinal capillaries to the intraluminal gut space, and/or limiting the absorption of modified release formulations. Contraindications of MDAC are as those for single-dose activated charcoal (above). The optimal dosage is not confirmed, but it is commonly prescribed as 12.5 g/hour or 50 g every 4 hours, until improvement in clinical status. MDAC is recommended for poisoning due to carbamazepine, dapsone, phenobarbital, quinine, and theophylline and may also be of benefit in poisonings due to salicylate, colchicine, Amanita phalloides, cardiac glycosides, or phenytoin (see Table 66.3 ).

Ion exchange resins may attract poisons from the gut capillaries to the lumen. Sodium polystyrene sulfonate is used to treat hyperkalemia and can reduce lithium half-life. Prussian blue can be used to enhance the elimination of radiocesium and thallium (see Table 66.3 ).

Principles and Factors Influencing Poison Removal During Extracorporeal Treatments

Elimination of a poison depends on its physicochemical and pharmacologic properties and the ECTR used. Extracorporeal elimination of poison is significant in these conditions: 1) it can be extracted from the plasma, 2) extracorporeal clearance contributes to a significant proportion of total clearance, and 3) if the poison exerts its toxicity outside the plasma compartment, a significant proportion of its body stores can be eliminated during ECTR. The first condition depends on the molecular size, water solubility, and protein binding of the poison because these correlate to its extraction ratio (ER) and extracorporeal clearance (CL ECTR ). ER can be calculated as (A-V)/A, where A represents the inflow (prefilter) plasma concentration and V represents the outflow (postfilter) plasma concentration. An ER of 1.0 implies the complete removal of a substance from the plasma after a single pass through the extracorporeal circuit. Extracorporeal plasma clearance may be calculated as CL ECTR = Q B x (1-Hct) × ER, where Q B is the blood flow and Hct is the hematocrit. CL ECTR can also be calculated by quantifying the amount of poison in the spent ultrafiltrate and/or dialysate over a period and dividing by its averaged plasma concentration during the same period. The second condition relates to its endogenous clearance, and the third depends on its V D (see later).

Poison-Related Factors

Molecular Size

All ECTRs will remove poisons with a molecular weight (MW) below 1000 Da, but diffusion and convection will remove them more efficiently. Solutes larger than 1000 Da will be better removed by convection, adsorption, or centrifugation, although modern intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) can clear poisons up to 10,000 Da ( Table 66.4 ). Convection from hemodiafiltration (HDF) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can remove poisons with a MW up to 50,000 Da. Adsorption or centrifugation can remove poisons with a MW exceeding 100,000 Da.

Table 66.4

Summary of Extracorporeal Treatments

Process Molecular Weight Cutoff (Da) Protein Binding Cutoff Relative Cost Complications Comments
Albumin dialysis Diffusion, adsorption <60,000-100,000 <95% ++++ ++ Liver replacement support
CRRT Convection and/or
diffusion
<10,000-50,000 <80% ++ + Correction of uremia and acid-base/ E+ disorders
Exchange transfusion Centrifugation/Separation, filtration None None ++ ++ Easier than other ECTRs in neonates
Correction of hemolysis
Hemodialysis Diffusion <10,000 <80% + + Correction of uremia and acid-base/ E+ disorders
Hemofiltration Convection <50,000 <80% ++ + Correction of uremia and acid-base/ E+ disorders
Hemoperfusion Adsorption <50,000 <95% ++ +++ Saturation of cartridge requires changes
Peritoneal dialysis Diffusion <500-5000 <80% ++ ++ Low efficacy
Therapeutic plasma exchange Centrifugation/separation, filtration <1,000,000 None +++ +++

All extracorporeal treatments above are less likely to be useful for poisons that have a high V D or a high endogenous clearance.

CRRT, Continuous renal replacement therapy; Da, daltons, E+, electrolyte; ECTR, extracorporeal treatment; +, low; ++, moderate; +++, high; ++++, very high.

Protein Binding

The degree of protein binding impacts removal. Hemofiltration and hemodialysis only remove unbound poison, as the poison-protein complex exceeds the pore size of the hemofilter/dialyzer. Diffusion and convection remove poisons with a protein binding up to 80%, with a few exceptions. Hemoperfusion can remove poisons with a protein binding up to 90% to 95%, as binding to the adsorbent (activated carbon or, less commonly, a resin) competes with binding to plasma proteins. The clearance depends on the affinity of the poison for the adsorbent.

The degree of protein binding is influenced by the protein concentration, poison concentration, and pathologic states (e.g., uremia). In poisonings, saturation of protein binding sites (e.g., valproic acid and salicylate) may occur, increasing the free (unbound) fraction, which promotes removal by ECTR. Phenytoin quickly dissociates from albumin, so the unbound pool is constantly being removed by ECTR.

Endogenous Clearance

Extracorporeal removal will be useless if the endogenous clearance of a poison far outweighs its ECTR clearance. This explains why hemodialysis is futile for cocaine or toluene, which have high endogenous clearances (>4 mL/minute/kg). Additionally, significant impairment in endogenous metabolic and/or elimination pathways may increase the efficacy of ECTRs; for example, the renal clearance of metformin decreases from 500 mL/min to 0 mL/min in anuria, rendering ECTR clearance clinically significant.

Volume of Distribution (V D )

The V D is the apparent volume where a poison is distributed at equilibrium before clearance occurs (e.g., with rapid intravenous administration) and is calculated by dividing the total poison in the body by its concentration. This relationship assumes a single homogenous compartment of water in which the poison is distributed.

Poisons that distribute extensively in tissues (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants) have a high V D ; conversely, poisons that distribute in total body water, such as methanol, have a low V D (<1 L/Kg). Because ECTRs only remove poisons in the intravascular space, they will not significantly eliminate poisons with a high V D . For example, digoxin easily crosses the dialyzer; however, because of its high V D (7 L/kg), <5% of the total body burden will be removed during a 6-hour IHD. Many publications erroneously conclude that poisons with a high V D are amenable to ECTR removal on the basis of a high extracorporeal clearance or reduction of serum concentrations. ECTR may occasionally be considered for poisonings with a high V D (e.g., methotrexate and thallium) early after exposure and before distribution to tissues, when there is still a high burden of poison in the blood.

Available Extracorporeal Treatments to Enhance Elimination Of Poisons

Techniques facilitating poison removal are classified by their mechanism of removal: diffusion (hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis [PD]), convection (hemofiltration), adsorption (hemoperfusion with charcoal, CytoSorb), and centrifugation (therapeutic plasma exchange [TPE]). , The features of these treatments are summarized in Table 66.4 .

Intermittent Hemodialysis

During IHD, the poison diffuses from the blood compartment to a dialysate flowing in a countercurrent direction, separated by a semipermeable dialysis membrane. The principles that dictate solute removal in IHD also apply to poison elimination (see Chapter 62 ). The characteristics of a xenobiotic that favor efficient removal by IHD are low endogenous clearance (<4 mL/min/kg), low V D (<1–2 L/kg), low MW (<5000 10,000 Da), and low protein binding (<80%).

The type of dialysis membrane, its surface area, pore size, and the blood and dialysate flow rates will influence poison clearance ( Table 66.5 ). New high-flux membranes and catheters allow the removal of larger-sized poisons considered nondialyzable 30 years ago. Increasing the dialysate flow rate and, more importantly, the blood flow rate will promote diffusion and elimination of the poison. Filters with large surfaces and maximal blood and dialysate flow rates should be used unless contraindicated (e.g., concern for disequilibrium syndrome).

Table 66.5

Factors that May Enhance Poison Clearance During Hemodialysis

Larger surface area of dialysis membrane
High-flux dialyzer
High blood and dialysate flows
Increased ultrafiltration rate (with replacement solution)
Increased time on dialysis
Reduced recirculation
Two dialyzers in series
Two distinct extracorporeal circuits

IHD has several advantages over other ECTRs in poisonings because it rapidly removes poisons and corrects volume overload, acid-base, and electrolyte abnormalities. IHD is also more available, less expensive, and quicker to implement.

The most common acute complication of IHD is hypotension, which is seen in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) or end-stage kidney failure (ESKF) requiring fluid removal. Because poisoned patients rarely require net ultrafiltration, dialytic hypotension more likely reflects the effect of the poison. While hypotension is often a marker of poisoning severity and can be an indication for ECTR, it may limit the ECTR’s performance.

Hemoperfusion

During hemoperfusion, blood circulates through an extracorporeal circuit equipped with a charcoal or resin cartridge onto which the poison is adsorbed. Compared with diffusion, adsorption is not as limited regarding the MW, lipid solubility, or protein binding of the poison. Alcohols and most metals, however, are poorly adsorbed. Although certain exchange resins (XAD-4) can remove organic solutes and nonpolar (lipid soluble) poisons, they are unavailable in some countries (e.g., the United States).

Current hemoperfusion devices have improved biocompatibility. Coating of the sorbent material minimizes direct contact between the adsorbent and blood constituents, reducing the risk of embolization without impairing its adsorptive capacity. The circuit requires more anticoagulation than IHD and blood flows are limited to 350 mL/min because of hemolysis.

Hemoperfusion carries a higher risk of complications than IHD, namely the nonselective adsorption of certain cells and molecules. , Thrombocytopenia, hypoglycemia, and hypocalcemia can occur within hours. Cartridge costs are several-fold higher than for dialyzers and need to be replaced every 3 to 4 hours due to saturation. With technologic advancements in IHD, clearances of theophylline and phenobarbital by hemoperfusion or IHD are now comparable. , , Hemoperfusion does not correct electrolyte and acid-base disturbances or fluid overload and is less available. Consequently, IHD is preferred in most settings where hemoperfusion is indicated.

Recently, CytoSorb, a hemoadsorption device containing polymer beads integrated into CRRT prefilter, has been developed to remove cytokines in septic shock. The device can adsorb xenobiotics with a MW up to 60 kDa and must be changed after 4 to 8 hours. Although there is experience with poisonings, it is uncertain if CytoSorb provides any advantage over IHD, given that most poisons are small. There are reports of successful treatment of amitriptyline, quetiapine, venlafaxine, digitoxin, and flecainide poisonings. However, given the large V D of these poisons, the impact of CytoSorb on clinical outcomes is uncertain.

Hemofiltration

During hemofiltration (HF), solute and solvent are removed by solvent drag (convection) and replaced by a physiologic solution. Clearance is dependent on the sieving coefficient (SC) of the membrane, which is the ratio of a solute concentration in the ultrafiltrate to its concentration in the plasma. A solute that freely crosses the membrane has an SC of 1, while a SC of 0 means that the solute cannot cross the membrane. Poison elimination by HF depends on factors similar to those regulating diffusion. However, convective transport also allows the removal of larger poisons, up to 50,000 Da, which has limited relevance in toxicology because most poisons have a MW below 2000 Da.

Combined Therapies

Diffusion and convection are increasingly combined (hemodiafiltration). Adsorption (hemoperfusion) and diffusion (IHD) are sometimes used concurrently, in series, to maximize poison clearance. However, the clearance of this combination is not additive and increases complications. Clearances are additive if the therapies are implemented in parallel, with two distinct circuits.

Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Most ECTRs can be offered intermittently or continuously. CRRT is popular in the intensive care unit (ICU) to manage AKI, and available in various forms (see Chapter 64): continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. Their role in poisoning remains uncertain. The solute clearance with CRRT is lower than with IHD because of lower blood and effluent flow rates. In AKI, CRRT is often chosen due to better tolerability for fluid removal in shock. However, in poisoned patients, net ultrafiltration is rarely required and IHD therefore preferred given its superior poison clearance. CRRT may be used after IHD to avoid a rebound in poison concentration; however, the benefit of this practice is uncertain (see later).

Sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) is a hybrid technique between IHD and CRRT, , which provides a lower poison clearance than IHD over the same period.

Peritoneal Dialysis

PD clears substances by diffusion but has a limited role in acute poisoning, as the maximum clearance is 15 mL/min, representing <10% of that achieved during IHD. However, PD does not require an extracorporeal circuit and may be easier to perform in neonates and the only technique available is resource-poor settings.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Plasmapheresis

Plasmapheresis involves the withdrawal of venous blood and separation of plasma from blood cells by filtration or centrifugation and reinfusion of cells with autologous plasma or another replacement solution (Chapter 65). In TPE, the removed plasma is discarded and replaced by 5% albumin or fresh-frozen plasma. Clearance is limited by the plasma removal rate (≈50 mL/min). , TPE is considered for highly protein-bound (>95%) or large poisons (>50,000 Da), such as cisplatin , L-thyroxine , and vincristine. TPE has been used to treat near-fatal infusion reactions to rituximab. Complications include those associated with catheter installation, bleeding, hypocalcemia, and hypersensitivity reactions to the replacement solution. ,

Exchange Transfusion

During exchange transfusion (ET), whole blood or red blood cells are removed by apheresis and replaced with transfused blood products. ET may be considered in poisons causing massive hemolysis (e.g., sodium chlorate or nitrite poisoning in a patient with G6PD deficiency) or in infants, as it is technically simpler than IHD.

Extracorporeal Liver Assist Devices (Albumin Dialysis)

Albumin dialysis is historically used to replace liver function in fulminant hepatitis or severe cirrhosis. There are three types of “albumin dialysis.” Single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD) is similar to CRRT with albumin added to the dialysate. Molecular Adsorbents Recirculation System (MARS) is identical to SPAD, but the albumin-enhanced dialysate (with the adsorbed poison) is recycled after going through a dialysis filter with resin and charcoal cartridges. Prometheus combines albumin adsorption with IHD after selective filtration of the albumin fraction through a polysulfone filter.

These devices can theoretically remove albumin-bound xenobiotics, bile acids, and bilirubin better than IHD or CRRT and have been used to support liver function in hepatoxicity caused by acetaminophen and amatoxin-containing mushroom poisonings. However, they provide inferior clearances for theophylline, valproic acid, and phenytoin. Their role remains unclear due to their limited clearance and availability, as well as high cost and complication rates.

General Indications for Extracorporeal Removal of Poisons

The EXTRIP (EXtracorporeal Treatment In Poisoning, http://www.extrip-workgroup.org/ ) workgroup , has completed guidelines for the use of ECTR for several poisonings , and proposed directions for future research. The decision to initiate any form of blood purification must take into account a risk assessment, weighing benefits and risks/costs expected from extracorporeal treatments and poison-related factors ( Fig. 66.2 ). Absolute Indications for ECTR Include the Following (All Must Be Present).

Fig. 66.2

Practical approach for using an extracorporeal treatment in poisonings. This assessment requires analysis of the patient’s condition, the exposure, alternative treatments, molecular and toxicokinetic characteristics, and available modalities. ECTR, Extracorporeal treatment; HCO, high cutoff; MCO, medium cutoff; V D , volume of distribution.

  • 1.

    Severe toxicity from the exposure (either current or expected). The exposure to a specific poison must be significant enough to warrant active poison removal with ECTR. A proper risk assessment of the exposure, which includes close collaboration with a poison control center, may help to estimate the risk for a specific patient. In some cases, an estimation of ingestion, expressed in dose/weight (e.g., mg/kg), or blood concentrations might predict future clinical compromise and prompt transfer to a dialysis center and prophylactic ECTR (i.e., before the appearance of severe toxicity).

  • 2.

    There are no preferable alternative treatments. Antidotes may either amend or prevent the apparition of toxicity related to a poison and are usually preferred to ECTR, as they are less invasive. For example, this is the case for most acetaminophen poisonings, when N-acetylcysteine is available.

  • 3.

    The ECTR must be able to remove the poison (see earlier).

The clinician must anticipate which benefits are expected from the procedure; in some exposures, ECTR is life-saving (e.g., high-dose salicylate and paraquat) or prevent irreversible tissue damage (e.g., blindness from methanol). The advantages of ECTR in those circumstances would largely outweigh the costs and complications of the procedure. In other situations, ECTR may reduce the length of coma and mechanical ventilation, as seen in poisonings causing central nervous system (CNS) depression (e.g., barbiturates and anticonvulsants). Finally, ECTR may reduce hospital length of stay and associated costs from antidotes (e.g., dialysis versus fomepizole alone in a methanol-poisoned patient without metabolic acidosis).

These benefits must be weighed against: 1) mechanical risks of ECTR including those associated with catheter insertion (which can be minimized with ultrasonographic guidance) ; 2) removal of certain antidotes (e.g., ethanol and N-acetylcysteine) ; 3) withdrawal syndromes from a rapid decrease in drug concentration in patients with physiologic tolerance to a xenobiotic from chronic use; and 4) cost of a single dialysis including equipment and nursing/physician fees, which are usually minor compared with the cost of a day in the ICU. In the absence of any clinical outcome data, studies should demonstrate, at a minimum, significant poison removal.

Technical Considerations

Patients with poisonings are different from patients with AKI or ESKF, and the prescription of any ECTR should reflect these differences.

  • Vascular access: A double-lumen central catheter is required for most ECTRs. Because time is important, a temporary catheter is preferred, using ultrasound guidance to reduce complications. Inserting a femoral line does not require x-ray assistance but increases recirculation compared with subclavian or right jugular sites. A femoral access creates less malfunction than a left jugular catheter. Dual catheter sites and circuits may maximize poison clearance. ,

  • Choice of dialyzer/filter/adsorber: For IHD, high-flux dialyzers with the largest surface area should be used. The dialyzer or hemofilter should have a molecular size cut-off above that of the poison. For hemoperfusion, the only column licensed in the United States and Canada is the Gambro Adsorba 300c, a charcoal cartridge.

  • Anticoagulation: Unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin prevents clotting and maintaining the patency of the circuit. In patients at high risk of bleeding, heparin is substituted by saline flushes. For hemoperfusion, heparin is required in greater quantities than IHD to reduce the risk of hemolysis.

  • Blood, dialysate, and effluent flows: Should be maximized to increase clearance according to the manufacturer.

  • Dialysate composition: The sodium, bicarbonate, potassium, calcium, and magnesium concentrations in the dialysate or replacement fluid (RF) are adjusted according to the serum concentrations. Phosphate may be added to the dialysate or RF to avoid hypophosphatemia. Periodic measurements of serum biochemistry should be performed, and the dialysate modified accordingly.

  • Duration of ECTR: A 6-hour high-efficiency ECTR is usually sufficient. When significant toxicity is present or may be prolonged, or if a less efficient therapy (CRRT, SLED) is used, treatment can be extended. Hemoperfusion cartridges should be replaced after 3 to 4 hours due to saturation.

  • Patient disposition: Many poisoned patients die before dialysis. If the risk assessment for a suspected toxic exposure suggests that dialysis may be required, even if the patient does not yet meet the criteria, preemptive transfer to a center that can provide ECTR is justified. Because significant delay may occur before ECTR initiation, a temporary dialysis catheter should be inserted and a transfer to the ICU expedited.

  • Rebound: Rebound is a sudden increase in poison concentration after the cessation of ECTR, which typically occurs after IHD/hemoperfusion. Rebound may be due to 1. redistribution of poison from deep compartments (tissues and intracellular space) to the plasma (lithium, dabigatran, and methotrexate ), especially in poisons with a large V D ; or 2. ongoing absorption. In 1., the rebound might reflect a decrease in the poison concentration from the toxic compartments (lithium), which may be beneficial. In 2., the rebound can cause recurrent symptoms. If the rebound is of concern, a clinician may choose to repeat or extend ECTR or perform continuous therapy. Following ECTR, serial poison concentrations and clinical status should be monitored to identify redistribution (≈12–24 hours) or ongoing absorption.

Poisons Amenable to Extracorporeal Elimination

In most poisoning cases, ECTRs are not required. Poisons commonly responsible for fatalities (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, short-acting barbiturates, stimulants, and illicit street drugs) are not effectively amenable to ECTR. The remainder of this chapter focuses on the characteristics of poisons for which ECTR may be considered. Physicochemical characteristics of major poisons are shown in Table 66.6 , and common indications for ECTR in poisoning in Fig. 66.3 .

Table 66.6

Physiochemical Characteristics and Toxicokinetics of Various Poisons

Molecular Weight (Da) Protein Binding Volume of Distribution (L/Kg) Endogenous Clearance in Healthy Adults (mL/min/kg)
Acetaminophen 151 20% 1 5
Atenolol 266 5% 1.1 2.1
Baclofen 214 30% 0.9 3
Carbamazepine 236 75% 1.2 1.3
Ethylene glycol 62 0% 0.6 1.8
Gabapentin 171 0% 0.9 1.5
Isoniazid 137 10% 0.7 2 (slow acetylator)
7 (rapid acetylator)
Isopropanol 60 0% 0.6 1.2
Lithium 7 0% 0.8 0.4
Metformin 166 5% 5 10
Methanol 32 0% 0.6 0.7
Methotrexate 454 50% 0.8 1.5
Paraquat 186 5% 1.0 8
Phenobarbital 232 40% 0.7 0.2
Phenytoin 252 90% 0.6 0.4
Pregabalin 159 0% 0.5 1.1
Salicylic acid 138 80% 0.2 1.5
Sotalol 272 0% 1.4 2
Theophylline 180 60% 0.5 0.7
Valproic acid 144 90% 0.2 0.1

Da, daltons.

Fig. 66.3

Frequency of extracorporeal treatments used in the United States from 1983 to 2015.

ECTR, Extracorporeal treatment

.

Toxic Alcohols: Ethylene Glycol, Methanol, AND Isopropanol

Ethylene glycol (EG) is found in antifreeze, radiator fluid, solvents, hydraulic brake fluid, deicing solutions, and polishes. Methanol (wood alcohol) is found in windshield or glass cleaning solutions, printing solutions, dyes, thinners, fuels, and antifreeze additives for gasoline. Isopropanol (i.e., isopropyl alcohol or 2-propanolol) is found in “rubbing alcohol,” skin lotion, aftershave lotion, denatured alcohol, solvents, and cleaning products.

Toxicology and Toxicokinetics

EG, methanol, and isopropanol are small unbound molecules with a small V D (0.6 L/Kg). Peak concentrations occur rapidly after ingestion. Approximately 30% of EL is excreted unmetabolized by the kidneys; the remainder is oxidized to glycolaldehyde by alcohol dehydrogenase (ALDH) in the liver and converted to glycolic acid by aldehyde dehydrogenase, followed by the conversion of glycolic acid to glyoxylic acid ( Fig. 66.4 , A). Metabolic acidosis results mainly from the accumulation of glycolic acid, while oxalate precipitates in tissues including kidneys, causing AKI. Glycolate cross-reacts with some lactate assays on point-of-care blood analyzers, which falsely elevates serum lactate levels. Any EL ingestion over 0.1 mL/kg requires treatment. Deaths have been reported with ingestions as low as 30 mL.

Fig. 66.4

Metabolism of toxic alcohols.

(A) Ethylene glycol: The broken arrow points to inhibitors of alcohol dehydrogenase; the asterisk denotes the rate-limiting step. In the presence of the electron acceptor, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD + ), ethylene glycol is oxidized to glycolaldehyde by alcohol dehydrogenase. Aldehyde dehydrogenase then rapidly converts glycolaldehyde to glycolic acid, which is followed by the slow conversion of glycolic acid to glyoxylic acid (the rate-limiting step). Final end products include oxalic acid, glycine, and oxalomalic acid, which are all effectively removed by intermittent hemodialysis (IHD). (B) Methanol: The broken arrow points to inhibitors of alcohol dehydrogenase; the asterisk denotes the rate-limiting step. (C) Isopropanol. NADH + H + , reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; TCA, tricarboxylic acid.

Methanol is metabolized principally by ALDH (85%) to formaldehyde and then oxidized by formaldehyde dehydrogenase to formic acid (see Fig. 66.4 , B). In a folate-dependent step, formic acid is transformed to water and CO 2 . Formic acid inhibits cytochrome c oxidase in cells’ mitochondria and is responsible for toxic symptoms. The lethal dose of methanol is 10 mL.

Approximately 80% of isopropanol is metabolized to acetone via ALDH, and the remainder is eliminated unchanged in urine ( Fig. 66.4 , C). Isopropanol displays first-order elimination kinetics with an elimination half-life of 3 to 8 hours, , while the half-life of acetone is 10 hours. , Most of the CNS depressant effects are attributed to isopropanol. The lethal dose is 150 to 250 mL.

Clinical Presentation

All toxic alcohols initially cause inebriation, similar to that seen with ethanol. As EL is metabolized, metabolic acidemia appears after a latent period of approximately 3 to 6 hours after ingestion, with progressive neurotoxicity (coma, seizures, cerebral edema, cranial nerve defects, radiculopathies, brainstem injury); cardiotoxicity (hypotension); and respiratory distress. AKI occurs in approximately 50% of patients due to the precipitation of calcium oxalate crystals in the kidneys and direct tubular injury from glycolate. If left untreated, EL poisoning leads to multiorgan failure and death in up to 20% of patients.

Methanol poisoning results in neurologic, visual, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. CNS manifestations may include inebriation, headaches, dizziness, nausea, seizures, and cerebral edema. Methanol can produce a Parkinson-like syndrome through damage to the putamen and subcortical white matter of the basal ganglia. , Metabolic acidosis, caused by accumulation of formate and lactate, can be severe. Vision deficits (blurred vision and decreased visual acuity) are the hallmark of methanol poisoning and usually occur 6 to 30 hours after exposure, depending on how much ethanol is coingested. Vision deficits are permanent in 25% of cases. Death is usually caused by cardiovascular shock and respiratory arrest.

Isopropanol overdose is characterized by altered sensorium, which may range from mild inebriation, lethargy, stupor, respiratory depression, and/or coma. Isopropanol irritates the GI tract causing nausea, vomiting, gastritis, and abdominal pain. Isopropanol is toxic to myocytes and can induce severe reversible hypotension. Other findings include hypoglycemia from impaired gluconeogenesis, hypothermia, and hemolytic anemia.

Diagnostic Testing

Toxic alcohol assays are not widely available. EG and methanol poisoning should be considered in any patient presenting with a high anion gap metabolic acidosis and/or a high osmol gap. In early presentations, the osmol gap is more prominent, whereas in later presentations, a high anion gap predominates. As toxic alcohols are osmotically active, the osmol gap, calculated as the difference between measured osmolality (by freezing point depression) and calculated osmolarity, approximates the toxic alcohol concentration (in mmol/L) and can be converted to mg/dL ( Table 66.7 ). The osmol gap can be monitored serially during admission and dialysis when serum concentrations are unavailable. , The calculated osmolarity is based on the concentrations of sodium, glucose, blood urea nitrogen, and ethanol:

Toxic alcohol concentration ( in mmol / L ) ≅ Osmol gap = Osmolaritymeas − Osmolalitycalc = Osmolaritymeas − ( 2 × Na + glucose + urea + 1.2 × ethanol ) SI units = Osmolalitymeas − ( 2 × Na + glucose / 18 + BUN / 2.8 + ethanol / 4 ) Imperial units

Table 66.7

Conversion of Toxic Alcohol Concentration From mmol/L to mg/dL

Toxic Alcohol Conversion from mmol/L to mg/dL
Acetone x 5.81
Diethylene glycol x 10.61
Ethanol x 4.61
Ethylene glycol x 6.21
Isopropanol x 6.01
Methanol x 3.20
Propylene glycol x 7.61

The normal osmol gap is between–5 and 10. In isopropanol poisoning, isopropanol and acetone contribute to the osmol gap. A “normal” osmol gap does not exclude the diagnosis of toxic alcohol poisoning: If a specific patient has a baseline gap of 0, ingestion of 25.6 mg/dL or 8 mmol/L of methanol would still lead to a “normal” osmol gap. Also, the osmol gap remains normal if a patient presents late after ingestion, once the parent alcohol has undergone complete oxidation since glycolic acid and formic acid do not contribute to the osmol gap.

Similarly, the anion gap can be used to estimate the glycolic acid and formic acid concentrations. The anion gap is the difference between measured cations (Na + and K + ) and anions (Cl and HCO 3 ), representing the difference between unmeasured anions and cations, in mmol/L. Lactate can also contribute to the anion gap and needs to be factored in the equation:

Glycolic acid / Formic acid concentration = Na + K − Cl − HCO 3 − Lactate − 14

Studies have shown a good correlation between the concentration of metabolites and the anion gap. , The absence of an anion gap suggests early presentation after EG or methanol exposure before metabolism, coingestion of ethanol, or another alcohol (isopropanol and propylene glycol).

Calcium oxalate crystals are found in the urine sediment of 50% of patients with EG exposure, 4 to 8 hours after ingestion, , but can also be seen with large ingestions of vitamin C or high oxalate-containing food. Urine that fluoresces under Wood lamp illumination is a unique feature of EG poisoning attributed to many types of antifreeze, which can be detected for up to 6 hours after ingestion. , Other laboratory abnormalities are hypocalcemia and leukocytosis.

Characteristic findings of isopropanol exposure include increased osmol gap, absent or low-grade metabolic acidosis with a normal anion gap, fruity acetone breath, acetonemia, and acetonuria without hyperglycemia. Acetonemia or acetonuria can be suspected by a positive sodium nitroprusside reaction in plasma or urine. A low concentration of serum ketones 2 hours after isopropanol ingestion (in absence of ALDH inhibition) generally excludes substantial ingestion.

Treatment

In toxic alcohol poisonings, clinicians often must initiate treatment before confirming the exposure with specific laboratory tests. Management includes supportive care, correction of acidemia, antidotal therapy, and ECTRs. High-minute ventilation should be maintained if significant acidemia is present. Because toxic alcohols are rapidly absorbed from the GI tract, decontamination is seldom performed. Aspiration of the gastric contents may be useful if the ingestion is recent.

The cornerstone of treatment for EG or methanol poisoning is to prevent their metabolism into toxic metabolites using an antidote (i.e., ethanol or fomepizole, which competes for ALDH).

Indications for these antidotes are , :

  • 1.

    Serum concentration of EG >20 mg/dL (3.2 mmol/L) or methanol >20 mg/dL (6.3 mmol/L)

  • 2.

    Documented recent (hours) ingestion of toxic amounts of EG or methanol and osmol gap >10

  • 3.

    A history or strong clinical suspicion of EG or methanol poisoning and at least two of the following: arterial pH <7.3, serum bicarbonate <20 mEq/L, osmol gap >10, or oxalate crystals in urine

ALDH inhibitors are contraindicated in isopropanol poisoning; the metabolite (acetone) has limited toxicity, and administration of ethanol and fomepizole can prolong the CNS depressant effect of isopropanol. Ethanol can be given enterally, intravenously, or via the dialysate. The intravenous formulation allows immediate bioavailability and avoids GI distress. Target serum ethanol concentrations for ALDH competition are between 100 and 150 mg/dL (21.7–32.5 mmol/L); below this concentration, ALDH inhibition would not maximally inhibit metabolite formation. Above this range, there is a high risk of respiratory depression. Fomepizole (4-methylpyrazole, Antizol) has largely replaced ethanol as the primary therapy and has multiple advantages over ethanol: 1) more potent ALDH inhibition, 2) simple dosing, 3) predictable pharmacokinetics, 4) no blood monitoring, 5) few side effects and no CNS depression, and 6) longer duration of action. Its main drawback is the cost (US$1000 per dose). Either antidote is usually continued until EG or methanol concentrations are below 20 mg/dL (EG <3.2 mmol/L or methanol <6.3 mmol/L) and the patient is asymptomatic with a normal arterial pH. Table 66.8 presents dosages of ethanol and fomepizole during toxic alcohol poisonings.

Table 66.8

Antidote Dosage During Toxic Alcohol Poisoning

40% PO Ethanol (e.g., scotch) 10% IV Ethanol IV Fomepizole
Loading dose a 1.8 mL/kg 7.6 mL/kg 15 mg/kg
Maintenance dose 0.2 mL/kg/h (nondrinker)
0.5 mL/kg/h (chronic drinker)
0.8 mL/kg/h (nondrinker)
2.0 mL/kg/h (chronic drinker)
10 mg/kg q12h x 4 doses, then 15 mg/kg q 12 hours
Maintenance dose during IHD 0.5 mL/kg/h (nondrinker)
0.8 mL/kg/h (chronic drinker)
2.1 mL/kg/h (nondrinker)
3.3 mL/kg/h (chronic drinker)
Same dose but q4h or a constant infusion of 1.0-1.5 mg/kg/h

IHD, Intermittent hemodialysis.

Acidemia should be corrected with the administration of IV sodium bicarbonate, which enhances deprotonation of acid metabolites, making them less likely to penetrate end-organ tissues (retina and kidney) and increasing their excretion by the kidneys. An intravenous bolus (1–2 mEq/kg), followed by an infusion, if necessary, should be given to maintain an arterial pH between 7.45 and 7.55. Asymptomatic hypocalcemia is not routinely treated in EG poisoning because it could exacerbate calcium oxalate crystal formation and deposition. Pyridoxine, thiamine, and magnesium are cofactors in the metabolism of EG, and their supplementation is recommended in malnourished patients or those with known deficits. Folic acid supplementation (50 mg IV every 4 to 6 hours for 5 doses) is recommended for methanol poisoning.

ECTRs, especially IHD, are extremely efficient at removing alcohols and their toxic metabolites, as well as correcting metabolic acidosis. With optimal dialysis parameters, clearance of alcohols and metabolites can reach 250 mL/min.

The increasing availability of fomepizole has modified the indications and pertinence of ECTR because of its great efficacy in preventing metabolite formation. Patients with EG poisoning without acidosis or kidney impairment may be treated with fomepizole alone, whatever the concentration of EG. The same applies to methanol; however, endogenous clearance of methanol with fomepizole is low. Assuming a methanol half-life of 54 hours with fomepizole, a patient with a methanol concentration of 320 mg/dL (100 mmol/L) would need 9 days to reach a safe methanol concentration (<20 mg/dL or 6.3 mmol/L). Dialysis might reduce hospitalization costs and antidote requirements for patients poisoned with EG or methanol. , IHD is mandatory with metabolic acidosis or an increased anion gap because this indicates toxic metabolite accumulation.

Indications for ECTR for EL and methanol poisoning include the following , :

  • Serum methanol concentration >50 mg/dL (15.6 mmol/L) or serum EG >50 mmol/L

  • Osmol gap >50 due to methanol or EG

  • Serum glycolate concentration is >8–12 mmol/L

  • Anion gap calculated with K ≥24 mmol/L

  • Metabolic acidosis (pH <7.2)

  • Coma or seizures

  • Vision deficits due to methanol

  • AKI or CKD

The expected duration of dialysis (hours) can be estimated using an estimated half-life of EG or methanol of 2.5h during IHD , provided that metabolic acidosis is corrected. Monitoring of the toxic alcohol concentration or osmol gap is recommended to confirm the estimation. IHD should be continued until the parent alcohols are <20 mg/dL (EG <3 mmol/L or methanol <6 mmol/L) and metabolic acidosis is corrected. CRRT offers lower clearance and requires longer treatment but may be considered if IHD is unavailable. ,

IHD effectively removes isopropanol and acetone and is indicated when the isopropanol concentration is >400 mg/dL (66.6 mmol/L), or with prolonged coma, hypotension, myocardial depression, tachydysrhythmias, or AKI.

The use of heparin should preferably be avoided in methanol-poisoned patients due to the increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage.

Salicylic Acid

Salicylates are analgesics, antipyretics, and antiinflammatories, and aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is commonly prescribed for its antiplatelet properties. Topical salicylic acid is a keratolytic and wart remover, oral bismuth subsalicylate (Pepto-Bismol) treats gastroesophageal reflux, and topical methyl salicylate is an analgesic and antiinflammatory. ,

Toxicology and Toxicokinetics

Salicylates are rapidly absorbed from the GI tract. Peak serum concentrations occur within an hour, except for enteric-coated products. In acute overdose, bezoar formation and pylorospasm may prolong absorption and the onset of symptoms can be delayed. ,

With therapeutic dosing, salicylic acid undergoes first-order hepatic metabolism and <10% of salicylate is excreted unchanged by the kidneys. Its elimination half-life is 2 to 4 hours. , In acute overdose, protein binding decreases from 90% to 50%, the V D increases, and metabolism becomes saturated, leading to a prolonged elimination half-life (>30 hours). Salicylic acid is a weak acid (pKa of 3.0). It exists predominantly in the nonionized form in the plasma at physiologic pH:

H + + Sal − ↔︎ HSal

Nonionized particles cross cell membranes including the blood-brain barrier more readily than the ionized form. Acidemia drives the above reaction to the right, increasing CNS toxicity. Alkalinization drives the reaction to the left, reducing cell toxicity and favoring urinary elimination.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnostic Testing

Salicylate poisoning can be acute or chronic. Acute ingestions >150 mg/kg lead to mild-to-moderate toxicity while >500 mg/kg is potentially lethal. The therapeutic range is 10 to 30 mg/dL (0.7–2.2 mmol/L). Toxic symptoms are usually seen at concentrations exceeding 75 mg/dL (5.4 mmol/L) and high risk of lethality >10 mg/dL (7.2 mmol/L).

Acute salicylate ingestion causes nausea, vomiting, and decreased gastric motility. Acid-base abnormalities occur, with the classical finding being mixed respiratory alkalosis and high anion gap metabolic acidosis. Salicylate stimulates the respiratory center in the brainstem, leading to a fall in PCO 2 . Metabolic acidosis is caused by accumulation of organic acids and lactic acid production from increased minute ventilation and uncoupling of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. ,

Salicylates cause a variety of neurologic symptoms including tinnitus, central hyperthermia, vertigo, agitation, delirium, hallucination, or coma. , As stupor progresses, there may be blunting of the respiratory response, decreasing blood pH, and increasing salicylate entry to the CNS. , Tinnitus occurs at salicylate concentration of 30 mg/dL (2.2 mmol/L). Early salicylate poisoning may present with hyperglycemia due to glycogenolysis, gluconeogenesis, and decreased peripheral use. Hypoglycemia occurs later and is a marker of severe poisoning.

Chronic poisoning from regular therapeutic salicylate doses can occur, especially when kidney function is decreased. Symptoms such as confusion and pulmonary edema are more prominent than noted at the same concentration following acute ingestion.

The diagnosis of salicylate poisoning is suspected from the history, clinical findings, and metabolic abnormalities. An elevated anion gap with respiratory alkalosis should prompt salicylate measurement. Because absorption may be erratic or prolonged, serial measurements (every 2–4 hours) are required to identify the peak concentration. While salicylate concentrations reflect the risk of poisoning, treatment is also prompted by symptoms. The Done nomogram is no longer used because of its poor predictive value.

Treatment

General principles of poisoning management apply to salicylates. However, patients are dependent on high-minute ventilation and high serum pH to reduce salicylate entry into the CNS. Endotracheal intubation should be performed only if necessary and by an experienced clinician. Ventilator settings should replicate the patient’s respiratory pattern before intubation, although difficult because of auto-PEEP.

Further therapy aims at decreasing absorption and increasing elimination of salicylates. MDAC decreases absorption and increases elimination , but is less efficacious for enhanced elimination than urine alkalinization. , , , Serum and urine alkalinization are crucial. For salicylate poisoning, urine alkalinization reduces the elimination half-life from 19 to 5 hours. Because the ionization constant (pKa) is a logarithmic function, small changes in urine pH will have a large effect on salicylate elimination. , The bicarbonate infusion is titrated a urine pH of 7.5 and continued until the serum salicylate concentration is <30 mg/dL (2.2 mmol/L). Alkaline urine cannot be produced in hypokalemia since kidney reabsorption of potassium occurs via the H + /K + exchange pump in exchange for hydrogen. For this reason, and because kaliuresis complicates bicarbonate therapy, potassium should be monitored and hypokalemia aggressively corrected. Preemptive potassium supplementation is recommended if serum potassium is <4 mmol/L prealkalinization. Alkalinization may be contraindicated in AKI or pulmonary edema, when IHD is preferred. Neither MDAC nor urine alkalization replace ECTR in severe poisonings.

Salicylate is highly dialyzable due to its low V D , low MW, and saturation of protein binding at high plasma concentrations. IHD maximizes salicylate removal and corrects acid-base status. It is noteworthy that most deaths occur before ECTR initiation.

Indications for ECTR include any of the following attributable to salicylate poisoning :

  • Neurologic symptoms (confusion, seizures, coma)

  • New hypoxemia requiring supplemental oxygen (e.g., due to pulmonary edema)

  • pH <7.25

  • Serum salicylate concentration >90 mg/dL (6.5 mmol/L)

  • Impaired kidney function with salicylate concentration >90 mg/dL (6.5 mmol/L)

  • Clinical deterioration despite appropriate treatment

Treatments should be maintained until salicylate concentrations are below 19 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L) with clinical improvement. ,

Lithium

Lithium has a narrow therapeutic range (0.4–0.8 mmol/L) and major side effects are rapidly seen once supratherapeutic concentrations are reached.

Toxicology and Toxicokinetics

The absorption of lithium is rapid at therapeutic doses. Peak blood concentrations are usually delayed 8 to 12 hours post-ingestion in acute poisoning. Lithium is unbound to proteins and has a V D of 0.7 to 0.8 L/kg. It distributes slowly into the brain, explaining the absence of initial CNS effects after an acute overdose. Lithium is eliminated by the kidneys, with 80% being reabsorbed in the tubules, so total body clearance is ≈20% of GFR. Lithium reabsorption follows that of sodium, so salt-depleted states (e.g., volume depletion) increase lithium retention. The half-life of lithium with therapeutic use is usually 18 to 24 hours but can be prolonged in the elderly, chronic users, and CKD. , With a normal kidney function, the elimination half-life is approximately 10 hours in acute overdose (due to distribution into extravascular tissues) versus 30 to 40 hours in chronic overdose.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnostic Testing

Lithium overdose is defined as “acute” after a single exposure in a naïve patient and as “chronic” after dosing or prescribing errors or when lithium clearance becomes impaired. Patients with acute poisoning have few symptoms at concentrations of 4.0 mmol/L, while clinical toxicity can occur in chronic poisonings with near therapeutic concentrations. , In acute poisoning, GI symptoms (nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea) and nonspecific cardiac conduction delay are predominant, although life-threatening dysrhythmias are uncommon. In chronic poisoning, symptoms are mostly neurologic, ranging from coarse tremor or dysarthria to lethargy, seizures, hyperthermia, coma, and death. , A protracted neurologic course can be seen after severe poisoning. Some patients develop a syndrome of irreversible lithium-effectuated neurotoxicity (SILENT), which relates to cerebellar and cognitive deficits.

Treatment

Therapy is guided by the type of poisoning (acute vs. chronic), lithium concentrations, symptoms, and kidney function. ,

Hyperthermia, dysrhythmias, and seizures should be treated according to standard protocols. Volume contraction favors proximal lithium reabsorption and should be promptly corrected with isotonic saline. Following resuscitation, hypotonic solutions or free water may be required for significant hypernatremia resulting from lithium-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus.

Whole bowel irrigation may prevent absorption of sustained-release formulations. , Oral sodium polystyrene sulfonate (Kayexalate), a cation-exchanger used for hyperkalemia, can bind unabsorbed lithium and enhance its elimination , , and can be considered in patients without contraindications with mild-to-moderate symptoms for whom ECTR is delayed or not offered. ,

Lithium is readily dialyzable and IHD is the modality of choice, with clearances of 180 mL/min with modern filters. Lithium concentrations often rebound after IHD, , but this should not be concerning, as lithium CNS concentrations continue to decrease during this time, unless there is ongoing absorption from the gut. CRRT provides clearances of approximately 25% of that by IHD. ,

Indications for ECTR include any of the following :

  • Severe neurologic features (central hyperthermia, seizures, and/or altered consciousness)

  • Serum Li concentration >5 mmol/L

  • Kidney impairment with symptoms and serum Li concentration >4 mmol/L

  • Life-threatening dysrhythmias

The threshold for ECTR is lower with impaired kidney function or if volume repletion is not tolerated. ,

Valproic Acid

Valproic acid is used to treat seizures, migraine, and mood disorders. Although acute valproic acid poisoning often results in mild self-limiting CNS depression, toxic effects and death are reported. ,

Toxicology and Toxicokinetics

Valproic acid has a small MW (144.21 Da) and V D (0.2 L/kg) and a high bioavailability. Serum concentrations peak 1 to 13 hours after ingestion, depending on the preparation and dose. Therapeutic serum concentrations range from 50 to 100 mg/L (347–693 μmol/L). Protein binding of valproic acid is saturable in overdose, being 90% at therapeutic concentrations and 35% at 300 mg/L (2079 μmol/L).

The liver rapidly metabolizes valproic acid. It undergoes glucuronic acid conjugation (70%) and β- and ω-oxidation to various metabolites, while <3% is excreted unchanged in urine. In overdose, more is metabolized by CYP450-mediated ω-oxidation to 5-OH-VPA and 4-en-VPA, which are responsible for some of the toxic effects.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnostic Testing

Most valproic acid overdoses are well tolerated. Toxicity is more likely following ingestions >200 mg/kg. , Acute poisoning is manifested by GI distress (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea); CNS abnormalities (confusion, obtundation, coma with respiratory failure); hypotension; and elevated transaminase concentrations. Free and total valproic acid serum concentrations poorly correlate with the severity of poisoning, but most patients with total concentrations greater than 180 mg/L (1247 μmol/L) develop some degree of CNS depression. Hyperammonemia can occur at any concentration, and when markedly elevated, it can contribute to encephalopathy, cerebral edema, and death.

At very high serum concentrations (>1000 mg/L or 6930 μmol/L), complications include high anion gap metabolic acidosis, hypernatremia, hypotension, hypocalcemia, pancreatitis, noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, bone marrow suppression, and AKI. , Diagnosis is based on a history of exposure, symptoms, and serum valproate concentration.

Treatment

Treatment begins with stabilization of respiratory and cardiovascular function. Activated charcoal should be administered, particularly within 1 hour of exposure, but can be useful beyond that period due to the prolonged absorption phase in overdose. Supportive data are limited regarding L-carnitine as a treatment for hyperammonemic encephalopathy. , If used, intravenous L-carnitine can be administered with a loading dose of 100 mg/kg, followed by infusions of 50 mg/kg every 8 hours, up to a maximum of 3 g per dose until ammonia levels are decreasing.

IHD clears ammonia, corrects metabolic acidosis, and removes valproic acid in overdose due to saturation of plasma protein binding. ,

Indications for ECTR include any of the following attributable to valproate toxicity :

  • Serum valproate concentration >900 mg/L (6250 μmol/L)

  • Shock

  • Cerebral edema, coma, or respiratory depression requiring mechanical ventilation

  • Acute hyperammonemia

  • pH ≤7.10

Rebound of valproic acid concentrations occurs 5 to 13 hours after IHD, requiring additional sessions. Hemoperfusion has been successfully used in cases but is limited by early column saturation. “In-series” IHD-hemoperfusion offers marginal advantage over IHD in terms of efficacy but is offset by the added cost and potential complications. CRRT is less effective and should only be used if IHD is unavailable or if cerebral edema is present. , Albumin dialysis, TPE, and PD are inferior therapeutic options in valproate poisoning and are not recommended. ,

Carbamazepine

Carbamazepine is used for seizures, pain management, and mood disorders.

Toxicology and Toxicokinetics

Carbamazepine inhibits sodium channels, neuronal depolarization, and glutamate release and appears to have anticholinergic effects at high concentrations.

Carbamazepine is available in immediate and modified-release formulations and is characterized by erratic and incomplete absorption, which is exacerbated in overdose due to pharmacobezoar formation and ileus. Carbamazepine has small MW (236 D), small-to-moderate V D (1.2 L/Kg), and a protein binding of approximately 75%, which does not decrease much in overdose. It undergoes hepatic metabolism into many metabolites, the most important being carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide, which is pharmacologically active. Carbamazepine induces its own metabolism, which increases endogenous clearance with chronic use. The therapeutic concentration range is 4 to 12 mg/L (16.9–50.8 μmol/L).

Clinical Presentation and Diagnostic Testing

Carbamazepine toxicity frequently presents with neurologic, cardiovascular, and anticholinergic symptoms, which may be delayed because of its erratic absorption. Mild toxicity (≈30 mg/L or 127 μmol/L) presents as drowsiness, nystagmus, tachycardia, hyperreflexia, or dysmetria. In severe exposures (>40 mg/L or 169 μmol/L), lethargy, seizure, coma, QRS prolongation, hypotension, and ileus may develop; death is unusual. Agranulocytosis and SIADH are typically not seen in acute poisonings.

Diagnosis relies on the history, clinical findings, and laboratory testing. Serial measurements of serum carbamazepine concentrations are required because the time to peak may be beyond 24 hours. Concentrations should be obtained every 4 to 6 hours until a definite downward trend is seen.

Treatment

Most patients can be managed with supportive care including ventilatory support, benzodiazepines for seizures, vasopressors for hypotension, and sodium bicarbonate for sodium channel blockade. GI decontamination is administered even if the patient presents late after ingestion due to the prolonged absorption phase but is contraindicated if ileus is present. MDAC can enhance carbamazepine clearance and may reduce the duration of coma and need for mechanical ventilation. ,

Severe carbamazepine poisonings can be treated using ECTR, providing better and more predictable clearance than MDAC. Carbamazepine clearance with IHD compares with that of hemoperfusion and is therefore the ECTR of choice, given all the known advantages stated earlier. , , There are limited data on the ECTR clearance of the toxic metabolite carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide. , CRRT, TPE, and albumin dialysis have been used but provide lesser clearances. ,

Indications for ECTR include any of the following attributable to carbamazepine toxicity :

  • Prolonged coma

  • Seizures, cardiovascular instability, or other signs unresponsive to supportive care

  • Rising carbamazepine concentrations despite MDAC

Barbiturates

Barbiturates are CNS depressants used as sedatives, hypnotics, anxiolytics, and anticonvulsants. Phenobarbital is the most commonly used barbiturate worldwide.

Toxicology and Toxicokinetics

Absorption kinetics are variable and influenced by the dose, presence of ileus, and coingested drugs. Barbiturates are small molecules with low protein binding. Their metabolism is mostly hepatic, but phenobarbital undergoes some renal excretion. Chronic barbiturate use induces its own metabolism, increasing endogenous clearance.

An acute oral dose of 1 g of most barbiturates will cause serious toxicity. For phenobarbital, death can result in ingestions >2 g or concentrations >80 mg/L (345 μmol/L), without supportive care. The following discussion focuses on phenobarbital since it is the most encountered, and recommendations also apply to primidone because it is partially metabolized to phenobarbital.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnostic Testing

Phenobarbital has prolonged clinical effects, , , which progress from sedation in mild exposures to apnea, hypotension, circulatory collapse, hypothermia, and coma in large ingestions. , Concomitant AKI, cardiac, or pulmonary disease increases the clinical sensitivity to barbiturates. Early deaths after barbiturate ingestion are caused by respiratory and cardiovascular collapse, whereas later deaths are caused by acute lung injury, ventilator-acquired pneumonia, cerebral edema, or multiorgan failure, particularly when there is delayed presentation for medical care.

Treatment

Supportive measures including rewarming, hydration, and vasopressors are usually sufficient. Patients may be profoundly comatose and require mechanical ventilation for many days. MDAC increases the clearance of phenobarbital and is the first-line treatment for enhanced elimination. Urinary alkalinization can increase phenobarbital renal clearance by twofold to threefold. , However, because renal clearance of phenobarbital is low (<3 mL/min), alkalinization has lesser impact. A controlled trial indicated that MDAC was superior to MDAC plus urinary alkalinization, which was superior to urinary alkalinization.

No randomized studies have evaluated the effect of ECTR in humans, although the mortality rate was lower in an uncontrolled group with hemoperfusion. Modern high-flux dialyzers provide clearances at least equal to hemoperfusion cartridges.

Indications for ECTR include any of the following (in particular for phenobarbital poisoning) , :

  • Coma with respiratory depression

  • Hypotension not responding to vasopressors

  • Inefficiency of MDAC at reducing serum concentrations

When treating barbiturate poisoning in chronic users, there is a risk of precipitating barbiturate withdrawal when concentrations fall below the therapeutic range. This can be minimized by stopping ECTR and other treatments when the phenobarbital concentration is therapeutic, after which it may be prudent to reinitiate barbiturate treatment.

Phenytoin

Phenytoin is a first-line treatment of epilepsy. Phenytoin toxicity can occur readily due to its narrow therapeutic range, although phenytoin-related deaths are rare.

Toxicology and Toxicokinetics

Phenytoin has high protein binding (90 to 95%), which decreases to 70% in the presence of CKD or hypoalbuminemia but remains almost unchanged in overdose.

Phenytoin has erratic oral bioavailability, especially in overdose. , Phenytoin is mainly metabolized by the liver. The elimination half-life with oral therapeutic dosing is 14 to 22 hours but significantly longer in overdose. Therapeutic serum concentrations are 10 to 20 mg/L (40–80 μmol/L) and the potentially lethal dose in adults is 2 to 5 g.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnostic Testing

Phenytoin toxicity is predominantly neurologic, with severity loosely correlating with serum concentrations. Between 20 and 40 mg/L (80–160 μmol/L), nystagmus, ataxia, and mild CNS depression are apparent, which progress to lethargy, confusion, hypotension, coma, and seizures >40 mg/L (160 μmol/L). Cardiovascular toxicity is unusual with oral overdoses, but short-lived atrioventricular delays and bradycardia may occur following rapid intravenous infusion. Death caused by respiratory or circulatory depression is rare.

Total serum phenytoin concentrations should be obtained in all suspected overdoses. Some conditions (uremia, extremes of age, or concomitant use of agents) displace phenytoin from its albumin-binding site. The free phenytoin concentration should be measured if at all possible in such cases, and toxicity is apparent with free (unbound) phenytoin concentrations >2.1 mg/L (8.3 μmol/L).

Treatment

Supportive treatment is usually sufficient since most patients have an excellent outcome, although some may have a prolonged length of stay. Benzodiazepines are preferred for seizures. Due to prolonged absorption in overdose, gastrointestinal decontamination should also be considered in delayed presentations. Multiple-dose activated charcoal significantly reduces the elimination half-life of phenytoin. , ,

Experience with ECTRs is limited. Given the high protein binding of phenytoin, HP or TPE has been historically favored and used successfully. Surprisingly, IHD can enhance the elimination of phenytoin, perhaps due to its low binding constant to albumin, which ensures a constant pool of freely diffusible unbound phenytoin. This finding is attributable to high-flux, high-efficiency dialyzers—older ECTR apparatus did not significantly increase phenytoin clearance.

Neither PD nor CRRT has a role in phenytoin poisoning, and data are uncertain for albumin dialysis. In the case of actual or anticipated toxicity, with persistently elevated phenytoin concentration, IHD or HP can be considered.

Metformin

Metformin is the most popular antidiabetic drug worldwide.

Toxicology and Toxicokinetics

Metformin has a large V D (3 L/Kg) and high endogenous clearance from renal tubular secretion, with clearance up to 500 mL/min in patients with normal kidney function. The toxic dose in acute ingestions is likely to exceed 100 mg/kg.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnostic Testing

Metformin toxicity manifests as GI symptoms (e.g., abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting), metabolic acidosis with hyperlactatemia, and hypotension. Hypoglycemia, hypothermia, altered mental status, and acute pancreatitis have also been reported. , Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) usually occurs in the presence of underlying conditions, particularly AKI or CKD. MALA is variably defined as an arterial pH ≤7.35 and an elevated lactate concentration (e.g., >45 mg/dL or 5 mmol/L) from acute or chronic metformin poisoning. The extent to which metformin causes hyperlactatemia is controversial; some sources claim that the association is coincidental, , while others suggest that metformin is causative. The finding of asymptomatic patients who develop toxicity shortly after acute toxic ingestion gives credence to the latter hypothesis. Some, but not all, studies have reported a correlation between metformin concentrations and hyperlactatemia , ,

Treatment

Management is supportive and includes intravenous hydration, treating concomitant and exacerbating conditions, normalizing acid-base abnormalities, and reducing metformin concentrations. Activated charcoal should be considered within 1 to 2 hours of an acute large ingestion. Patients who develop metabolic acidosis with hyperlactatemia, hypoglycemia, or other signs of metformin toxicity should be admitted to the ICU.

Severely acidotic patients (pH ≤7.1) should receive intravenous sodium bicarbonate, although treatment can be limited by hypernatremia and volume overload. ECTRs correct acidosis faster than intravenous bicarbonate, clear lactate and metformin, and treat volume overload and uremia. A dramatic improvement from ECTR has been described in some acutely poisoned patients soon after IHD initiation, suggesting that the benefit might be attributable to pH correction rather than metformin removal. Studies note similar mortality rates between patients who did and did not receive ECTR, but the IHD group was sicker at baseline, which may support a clinical benefit of ECTR. , , , Metformin distributes in a smaller V D in AKI and is more readily removed by ECTR in these cases.

Indications for ECTR include any of the following attributable to metformin toxicity :

  • Lactate concentration >180 mg/dL (20 mmol/L)

  • Arterial pH ≤7.1

  • Failure of supportive therapy in severe MALA

  • Shock, impaired kidney function, or coma

Recent research has confirmed the poor outcomes related to these conditions. IHD is preferred over CRRT due to higher metformin and lactate clearances. , , More lactate is removed following 6 hours of IHD than 24 hours of continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration, although both remain inferior to normal physiological processes. Although IHD provides superior metformin and lactate clearance, CRRT may be used in some settings. , Hemoperfusion and TPE are not recommended.

Endpoints for ECTR cessation include normalization of blood pH and lactate. Shortened ECTR sessions can result in a marked rebound in lactate concentration, which may be reduced by sequentially using CRRT after IHD.

Paraquat

Paraquat (1,1′ dimethyl-4-4′-bipyridylium dichloride) is a fast-acting herbicide. Oral ingestion of paraquat is extremely toxic, with high morbidity and mortality (50%–90%) from exposures as low as 20 mL. Its access is restricted in some parts of the world but not in many developing countries.

Toxicology and Toxicokinetics

Plasma paraquat concentrations peak by 2 hours post-ingestion, with maximal tissue distribution over the next 6 hours. , Paraquat is distributed to most organs, especially the lungs, kidneys, and liver. It is predominantly excreted by the kidneys, with an elimination half-life of 12 hours with normal kidney function, and >48 hours with impaired kidney function. ,

Paraquat catalyzes the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) through redox cycling. The resultant oxidative stress causes extensive cell injury and necrosis and a secondary inflammatory reaction. , ,

Clinical Presentation and Diagnostic Testing

The clinical course depends on the dose and timing of presentation to a hospital. Ingestions between 20 and 40 mg/kg will usually cause AKI and multiorgan failure with death one to several weeks post-exposure, and ingestions >40 mg/kg cause death within 3 days. Most deaths are caused by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)-like presentation, progressing to pulmonary fibrosis , or corrosion to mucosal membranes and esophageal perforation, hepatic injury, and shock. Paraquat does not typically cause CNS effects.

Serum paraquat concentration and validated nomograms predict mortality, although assays are rarely available. A rapid and inexpensive qualitative test can be obtained by adding sodium dithionite to urine. If the urine changes from yellow to blue, it confirms recent paraquat exposure (the more intense the blue the higher the exposure).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 3, 2026 | Posted by in NEPHROLOGY | Comments Off on Enhanced Elimination of Poisons

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access