Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Sepsis: Should We Use High Volume or Specific Membranes?

 

Cytosorb

CYT-860-DHP

Lixelle

CTR-001

MPCF-X

Structure

Polystyrene divinyl copolymer beads

Polystyrene-based conjugated fibers

Porous cellulose beads

Porous cellulose beads

Cellulose beads

Surface

850 m2

>500 m2

>500 m2

>500 m2

>500 m2

IL-6 reduction within the first 2 h

<50 %

92 %

82.9 %

80 %

98.9 %

Endotoxin adsorption

No

Yes

No data

No data

No data





17.3.5.2 Sorbents Using an Apheresis System


The Prosorba column acts as a selective plasma exchanger [88]. Protein A, a major cell wall component of Staphylococcus aureus, binds human immunoglobulin (Ig) G with high affinity. In Prosorba columns, protein A is covalently bound to a silica matrix and used to purify the patient’s plasma. Cells and plasma are separated with a continuous cell separator and 1,250 ml plasma passes through the column. Treated plasma is then reconstituted with cells and returned to the patient. This procedure was initially approved for treatment of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Later, Prosorba immune-adsorption was successfully used in rheumatoid arthritis [88] and was granted FDA approval for treatment of moderate to severe forms of this disease. Few reports discuss the use of apheresis in sepsis [89].

The mechanism underlying Prosorba-induced improvement in rheumatoid arthritis and sepsis is unknown. Obviously, direct removal of IgG plays no role because as little as 1.5 % of circulating Ig is removed, and levels of rheumatoid factor and circulating immune complexes are barely modified throughout the entire treatment cycle [90]. Additional factors, such as complement activation or production of anti-idiotype antibodies, likely do contribute to the observed clinical improvement [90]. Recently, Suda and coworkers developed a new type of sorbent that specifically targets HMGB-1 [91].

As for other sorbents and other related techniques, antimicrobial adsorption can be very high [92, 93] as described also for hyper-adsorptive membranes [94].




17.4 Conclusions


CRRT in non-septic AKI can be is generally applied using a non-adsorptive biocompatible membrane of 1 m2. However, some relatively cheap non-selective adsorptive membranes such as the AN69 ST type are already used on a large scale in this condition as well.

Regarding HVHF and after the two large randomized trials that are negative regarding mortality end points, HVHF is no longer recommended in clinical practice but may still be evaluated in appropriate trials.

The IVOIRE trial did suggest that an early start at AKI RIFLE injury score in septic shock with AKI may improve mortality as compared to a late start at AKI RIFLE failure score. Delay of therapy between ICU admission and CRRT start above 48 h may also impact negatively mortality according to IVOIRE. These data need to be further confirmed or not by randomized trials.

High cut-off membranes can remove cytokines and are under evaluation for treatment of rhabdomyolysis and sepsis. However, a cut-off of 60,000 Da enhances albumin loss. Instead, medium cut-off membranes (e.g. cut-off at 50,000 Da) should be preferred.

To increase removal of inflammatory mediators in septic AKI, the use of highly adsorptive filters that can be considered in CRRT such as the AN69 ST, septeX, PMMA, and Oxiris membranes but without strong clinical evidences.

The CytoSorb membrane binds cytokines and is seems a promising membrane for sepsis treatment, though it fails to capture endotoxin and IL-10. So far, there is more evidence for HCO and PMX filters. The AN 69 Oxiris membrane may be a valid alternative as it does capture both endotoxin and cytokines. AN69 ST also adsorbs the important upstream mediator HMGB-1. PMMA is a powerful scavenger of endotoxin and numerous other cytokines. Finally, high porosity septeX membranes may perform well especially when used in CVVH mode.

Clinical evidence for the benefit of adsorptive columns and selective plasma exchange is still scarce.

More studies are definitely needed to identify the ideal membrane or sorbent for adjuvant treatment of sepsis.

The highly adsorptive membranes AN69 ST and PMMA may capture significant amounts of crucial antibiotics such as colistin, amikacin, and vancomycin necessitating dose adaptation.

Heparin-coated membranes do not preclude the use of anticoagulation.


Key Messages





  • HVHF is not recommended anymore in clinical practice, but appropriate studies are still wanted. A prescribed dose of 30–35 ml/kg/h is enough in order to deliver 25 ml/kg/h.


  • In septic shock with AKI, it is suggested to start CRRT earlier, at RIFLE injury (after the results of the IVOIRE trial).


  • New membranes and sorbents are promising but cannot be recommended at this stage in clinical practice, but well-designed trials are wanted.


  • High-cut-off (HCO) membranes designed for sepsis and rhabdomyolysis are under investigation but cannot yet be recommended in daily routine clinical practice.


References



1.

Palewsky PM, Zhang JH, O’Connor TZ, et al., for the VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network. Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359:7–20.


2.

Bellomo R, Cass A, Cole L, Finfer S, et al., for the RENAL replacement Therapy Study Investigators. Intensity of continuous renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1627–38.


3.

Morgera S, Haase M, Kuss T, et al. Pilot study on the effects of high cutoff hemofiltration on the need for norepinephrine in septic patients with acute renal failure. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2099–104.PubMedCrossRef


4.

Yumoto M, Nishida O, Moriyama K, et al. In vitro evaluation of high mobility group box 1 protein removal with various membranes for continuous hemofiltration. Ther Apher Dial. 2011;15:385–93.PubMed


5.

Thomas M, Moriyama K, Ledebo I. AN69: evolution of the world’s first high permeability membrane. Contrib Nephrol. 2011;173:119–29.PubMed


6.

Cruz DN, Antonelli M, Fumagalli R, et al. Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in abdominal septic shock: the EUPHAS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;301:2445–52, (electronic supplemental material).PubMedCrossRef


7.

Yaroustovsky M, Abramyan M, Popok Z, et al. Preliminary report regarding the use of selective sorbents in complex cardiac surgery patients with extensive sepsis and prolonged intensive care stay. Blood Purif. 2009;28:227–33.PubMedCrossRef


8.

Honoré PM, Jamez J, Wauthier M, Lee PA, Dugernier T, Pirenne B, Hanique G, Matson JR. Prospective evaluation of short-term, high-volume isovolemic hemofiltration on the hemodynamic course and outcome in patients with intractable circulatory failure resulting from septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3581–7.PubMedCrossRef


9.

Joannes-Boyau O, Rapaport S, Bazin R, Fleureau C, Janvier G. Impact of high volume hemofiltration on hemodynamic disturbance and outcome during septic shock. ASAIO J. 2004;50:102–9.PubMedCrossRef


10.

Boussekey N, Chiche A, Faure K, Devos P, Guery B, d’Escrivan T, Georges H, Leroy O. A pilot randomized study comparing high and low volume hemofiltration on vasopressor use in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1646–53.PubMedCrossRef


11.

Herrera-Gutiérrez ME, Seller-Pérez G, Arias-Verdu D, Delgado-Amaya M. Hemodynamic improvement after continuous renal replacement therapies: not only immunomodulation. J Transl Intern Med. 2014;2:11–7.CrossRef


12.

Joannes-Boyau O, Honoré PM, Gauche B, et al. High volume versus standard-volume haemofiltration for septic shock patients with acute kidney injury(IVOIRE study):a multicentre randomized Controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1535–46.PubMedCrossRef


13.

Zhang P, Yang Y, Lv R, Zhang Y, Xie W, Chen J. Effect of the intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with sepsis and acute kidney injury: a single-center randomized clinical trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:967–73.PubMedCrossRef


14.

Honore PM, Jacobs R, Joannes-Boyau O, Boer W, De Regt J, De Waele E, Van Gorp V, Verfaillie L, Spapen HD. Moving from a cytotoxic to a cytokinic approach in the blood purification labyrinth– have we finally found the ariadne thread ? Mol Med. 2012. doi:10.​2119/​molmed.​2012.​00300.PubMedCentralPubMed


15.

Joannes-Boyau O, Honore PM, Boer W, Collin V. Are the synergistic effects of high volume haemofiltration and enhanced adsorption the missing key in sepsis modulation? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:354–7.PubMedCrossRef


16.

Tetta C, Bellomo R, Inguaggiato P, Wratten ML, Ronco C. Endotoxin and cytokine removal in sepsis. Ther Apher. 2002;6:109–15.PubMedCrossRef


17.

Deans KJ, Haley M, Natanson C, Eichacker PQ, Minneci PC. Novel therapies for sepsis: a review. J Trauma. 2005;58:867–74.PubMedCrossRef


18.

Ronco C, Tetta C, Mariano F, Wratten ML, Bonello M, Bordoni V, Cardona X, Inguaggiato P, Pilotto L, d’Intini V, Bellomo R. Interpreting the mechanisms of continuous renal replacement therapy in sepsis: the peak concentration hypothesis. Artif Organs. 2003;27:792–801.PubMedCrossRef


19.

Honoré PM, Matson JR. Extracorporeal removal for sepsis: acting at the tissue level–the beginning of a new era for this treatment modality in septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:896–7.PubMedCrossRef


20.

Di Carlo JV, Alexander SR. Hemofiltration for cytokine-driven illnesses: the mediator delivery hypothesis. Int J Artif Organs. 2005;28:777–86.PubMed


21.

Honore PM, Jacobs R, Boer W, Joannes-Boyau O, De Waele E, De Regt J, Van Gorpe V, Collin V, Spapen N. New insights regarding rationale, therapeutic target and dose of hemofiltration and hybrid therapies in septic AKI. Blood Purif. 2012;33:44–51.PubMedCrossRef


22.

Peng Z, Singbartl K, Simon P, Rimmele T, Bishop J, Clermont G, Kellum JA. Blood purification in sepsis: a new paradigm. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;165:322–8.PubMed


23.

Rimmele T, Kellum JA. Clinical review: blood purification for sepsis. Crit Care. 2011;15:205.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 4, 2016 | Posted by in NEPHROLOGY | Comments Off on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Sepsis: Should We Use High Volume or Specific Membranes?

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access