Cytosorb
CYT-860-DHP
Lixelle
CTR-001
MPCF-X
Structure
Polystyrene divinyl copolymer beads
Polystyrene-based conjugated fibers
Porous cellulose beads
Porous cellulose beads
Cellulose beads
Surface
850 m2
>500 m2
>500 m2
>500 m2
>500 m2
IL-6 reduction within the first 2 h
<50 %
92 %
82.9 %
80 %
98.9 %
Endotoxin adsorption
No
Yes
No data
No data
No data
17.3.5.2 Sorbents Using an Apheresis System
The Prosorba column acts as a selective plasma exchanger [88]. Protein A, a major cell wall component of Staphylococcus aureus, binds human immunoglobulin (Ig) G with high affinity. In Prosorba columns, protein A is covalently bound to a silica matrix and used to purify the patient’s plasma. Cells and plasma are separated with a continuous cell separator and 1,250 ml plasma passes through the column. Treated plasma is then reconstituted with cells and returned to the patient. This procedure was initially approved for treatment of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Later, Prosorba immune-adsorption was successfully used in rheumatoid arthritis [88] and was granted FDA approval for treatment of moderate to severe forms of this disease. Few reports discuss the use of apheresis in sepsis [89].
The mechanism underlying Prosorba-induced improvement in rheumatoid arthritis and sepsis is unknown. Obviously, direct removal of IgG plays no role because as little as 1.5 % of circulating Ig is removed, and levels of rheumatoid factor and circulating immune complexes are barely modified throughout the entire treatment cycle [90]. Additional factors, such as complement activation or production of anti-idiotype antibodies, likely do contribute to the observed clinical improvement [90]. Recently, Suda and coworkers developed a new type of sorbent that specifically targets HMGB-1 [91].
17.4 Conclusions
CRRT in non-septic AKI can be is generally applied using a non-adsorptive biocompatible membrane of 1 m2. However, some relatively cheap non-selective adsorptive membranes such as the AN69 ST type are already used on a large scale in this condition as well.
Regarding HVHF and after the two large randomized trials that are negative regarding mortality end points, HVHF is no longer recommended in clinical practice but may still be evaluated in appropriate trials.
The IVOIRE trial did suggest that an early start at AKI RIFLE injury score in septic shock with AKI may improve mortality as compared to a late start at AKI RIFLE failure score. Delay of therapy between ICU admission and CRRT start above 48 h may also impact negatively mortality according to IVOIRE. These data need to be further confirmed or not by randomized trials.
High cut-off membranes can remove cytokines and are under evaluation for treatment of rhabdomyolysis and sepsis. However, a cut-off of 60,000 Da enhances albumin loss. Instead, medium cut-off membranes (e.g. cut-off at 50,000 Da) should be preferred.
To increase removal of inflammatory mediators in septic AKI, the use of highly adsorptive filters that can be considered in CRRT such as the AN69 ST, septeX, PMMA, and Oxiris membranes but without strong clinical evidences.
The CytoSorb membrane binds cytokines and is seems a promising membrane for sepsis treatment, though it fails to capture endotoxin and IL-10. So far, there is more evidence for HCO and PMX filters. The AN 69 Oxiris membrane may be a valid alternative as it does capture both endotoxin and cytokines. AN69 ST also adsorbs the important upstream mediator HMGB-1. PMMA is a powerful scavenger of endotoxin and numerous other cytokines. Finally, high porosity septeX membranes may perform well especially when used in CVVH mode.
Clinical evidence for the benefit of adsorptive columns and selective plasma exchange is still scarce.
More studies are definitely needed to identify the ideal membrane or sorbent for adjuvant treatment of sepsis.
The highly adsorptive membranes AN69 ST and PMMA may capture significant amounts of crucial antibiotics such as colistin, amikacin, and vancomycin necessitating dose adaptation.
Heparin-coated membranes do not preclude the use of anticoagulation.
Key Messages
HVHF is not recommended anymore in clinical practice, but appropriate studies are still wanted. A prescribed dose of 30–35 ml/kg/h is enough in order to deliver 25 ml/kg/h.
In septic shock with AKI, it is suggested to start CRRT earlier, at RIFLE injury (after the results of the IVOIRE trial).
New membranes and sorbents are promising but cannot be recommended at this stage in clinical practice, but well-designed trials are wanted.
High-cut-off (HCO) membranes designed for sepsis and rhabdomyolysis are under investigation but cannot yet be recommended in daily routine clinical practice.
References
1.
Palewsky PM, Zhang JH, O’Connor TZ, et al., for the VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network. Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359:7–20.
2.
Bellomo R, Cass A, Cole L, Finfer S, et al., for the RENAL replacement Therapy Study Investigators. Intensity of continuous renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1627–38.
3.
4.
Yumoto M, Nishida O, Moriyama K, et al. In vitro evaluation of high mobility group box 1 protein removal with various membranes for continuous hemofiltration. Ther Apher Dial. 2011;15:385–93.PubMed
5.
Thomas M, Moriyama K, Ledebo I. AN69: evolution of the world’s first high permeability membrane. Contrib Nephrol. 2011;173:119–29.PubMed
6.
7.
8.
Honoré PM, Jamez J, Wauthier M, Lee PA, Dugernier T, Pirenne B, Hanique G, Matson JR. Prospective evaluation of short-term, high-volume isovolemic hemofiltration on the hemodynamic course and outcome in patients with intractable circulatory failure resulting from septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3581–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
11.
Herrera-Gutiérrez ME, Seller-Pérez G, Arias-Verdu D, Delgado-Amaya M. Hemodynamic improvement after continuous renal replacement therapies: not only immunomodulation. J Transl Intern Med. 2014;2:11–7.CrossRef
12.
13.
14.
Honore PM, Jacobs R, Joannes-Boyau O, Boer W, De Regt J, De Waele E, Van Gorp V, Verfaillie L, Spapen HD. Moving from a cytotoxic to a cytokinic approach in the blood purification labyrinth– have we finally found the ariadne thread ? Mol Med. 2012. doi:10.2119/molmed.2012.00300.PubMedCentralPubMed
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Di Carlo JV, Alexander SR. Hemofiltration for cytokine-driven illnesses: the mediator delivery hypothesis. Int J Artif Organs. 2005;28:777–86.PubMed
21.
22.
Peng Z, Singbartl K, Simon P, Rimmele T, Bishop J, Clermont G, Kellum JA. Blood purification in sepsis: a new paradigm. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;165:322–8.PubMed
23.
Rimmele T, Kellum JA. Clinical review: blood purification for sepsis. Crit Care. 2011;15:205.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
< div class='tao-gold-member'>
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register a > to continue