(1)
Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Conventional PCNL is now essentially restricted to the management of complicated calculi. Routine stones can be managed simply by ESWL, FURS or “Mini Perc”.
Therefore, the current indications for PCNL are essentially “those calculi that cannot be easily and safely managed by less invasive techniques”. These include the following:
Complex Calculi
1.
Large, partial or complete staghorn calculi, particularly those complicated by infection.
Fig. 6.1
Staghorn calculus
2.
Large dense calculi that are too large or hard for ESWL, too large for FURS, or refractory to ESWL, e.g. cystine
Fig. 6.2
Dense or hard calculi that do not fragment with ESWL
Complex Anatomy
1.
Calculi associated with poor drainage, such as calculi in calyceal diverticulae, poorly draining lower pole calyces, pelviureteric junction obstructions or large impacted upper ureteric calculi.
Fig. 6.3
Obstructing calculi associated with poor renal drainage
2.
Calculi associated with difficult access from the flank or the ureter, where the skin to kidney distance is too long for ESWL to focus and stones unsuitable for FURS, e.g. obesity, horseshoe kidney
Fig. 6.4
An obese patient where the distance from the skin to the calculus exceeds the ESWL focal distance
3.
Access requiring a supracostal track, e.g.:
Spina bifida associated with skeletal deformities
Calyceal diverticulum in the upper pole of the kidney
Staghorn calculus requiring upper pole access
Fig. 6.5
A supracostal puncture track showing the surrounding structures
4.
Urinary diversions
Fig. 6.6
Calculi in urinary diversions such as an ileal conduit
5.
Hydronephrosis with associated distended kidney and thin parenchyma
Fig. 6.7
A puncture into a hydronephrosis for antegrade endopyelotomy
Introduction
Until a surgeon has mastered the skills of basic PCNL, he or she should not attempt a difficult PCNL. Prior to surgery, the surgeon must evaluate the anatomy, develop an approach for primary and secondary punctures and anticipate difficulties and complications, both intra- and post-operatively
Specialised equipment must be sourced before commencing of the procedure, e.g. long PCNL sheath, long nephroscope, flexible nephroscope, holmium laser for horseshoe kidney, urethrotome with back cutting sickle knife for endopyelotomy, etc.
Advanced Skills Required for Difficult PCNL
The surgeon must have mastered the techniques of accessing the kidney where there is little or no space to establish a guide wire in the collecting system.
The surgeon must be familiar with the techniques and complications of supracostal puncture.
The surgeon must be able to perform advanced punctures, e.g.
“Y” puncture
Target puncture
Puncture of a large hydronephrosis.
Obtaining renal access by utilising a guide wire in the retroperitoneum for the initial puncture.
The techniques of antegrade ureteroscopy.
Methylene blue and saline infusion to identify the direction of the renal pelvis.
Creation of a “long Amplatz sheath”.
These skills will be described in this chapter as they relate to specific clinical scenarios.
Scenario One: Large Infection-related Staghorn Calculus
Aim
Complete clearance of all infection-related stone by primary PCNL or combined therapy.
Potential Problems
Incomplete clearance due to the length of the procedure, renal and stone anatomy or difficult percutaneous access
Pyonephrosis, septicaemia or septic shock
Difficult access, particularly when the calculus fills the collecting system with minimal space between the calculus and the collecting system in which to establish a stable guide wire
Preoperative Tests, Treatment and Precautions
Patients must have a urine culture and (even if urine is sterile), parenteral antibiotics 48 h prior to procedure.
Cross match two units of blood.
CT-IVP
Assessment of the stone:
In a large stone, with a centrally placed stone mass and wide short calyces that can be easily accessed by two to three tracks, the surgeon should plan for complete primary clearance by PCNL.
Assessment of the Hounsfield Unit (HU) of the calculus can help with preparation.
An opaque or faintly opaque stone with a HU less than 400 is more likely to be struvite, hence softer and amenable to fragmentation by sonotrode. Conversely, higher HUs, above 500 and particularly towards or above 1000, tend to be calcium oxalate or calcium monohydrate, dense hard calculi that will almost certainly require ballistic lithotripsy.
Fig. 6.8
A struvite staghorn calculus with a large central stone mass and short, wide calyceal extensions suitable for complete clearance by PCNL monotherapy
The aim of surgery in this scenario is to completely clear the pelvic stone and as much of the peripheral stone volume as possible.
The peripheral calculi usually require two or even three separate “Target” or “Y” punctures for clearance.
The surgeon should commence by creating a primary track that will give access for removal of the majority of the stone bulk, including the central stone mass. If it is anticipated that the procedure may not be completed in one session, subsequent punctures should target those calyces with the poorest drainage. Further management of residual calculi will then be ESWL, PCNL, FURS or observation.
Fig. 6.9
Multiple peripheral calculi without a large central stone mass that may require an initial PCNL and subsequent PCNL, FURS or ESWL for complete clearance
Pyonephrosis
If the initial PCNL puncture aspirates frank pus, a nephrostomy should be inserted and the PCNL abandoned. The PCNL can be safely re-attempted following 5–7 days of percutaneous drainage and parental antibiotics. Failure to observe this precaution can result in the rapid development of septic shock.
Difficulties Encountered with Punctures for Complete Staghorn Calculi
It is usually easy to place the tip of the needle on the outer edge of a staghorn calculus, as the stone is big, easy to see on imaging, and can be felt when the needle tip contacts the stone. However, it is often difficult or impossible to thread a guide wire into the collecting system between the stone and the calyceal wall.
The surgeon has to establish a stable guide wire before being able to dilate a track onto the stone. This situation commonly arises when the needle hits the outer edge of the calyceal calculus. Little or no contrast can be aspirated and it is not possible to pass the tip of the guide wire between the stone and the collecting system.
Fig. 6.10
The PCN needle contacting the outer edge of the calyceal extension
This suggests that the needle is hitting the stone “end on”. The surgeon must make a new puncture, with the aim of placing the needle tip just proximal to the outer end parallel to and along the side of the neck of the calyceal extension of the calculus. The intention is for the needle to slide between the stone and the collecting system. Occasionally, gentle “over distension” by retrograde injection of contrast or saline through the RGC may separate and create some space between the stone and the calyceal wall. However, one must exercise caution to avoid contrast extravasation and sepsis from forcing infected urine into the renal tissue.
Fig. 6.11
The diagram above shows the needle hitting the outer border of the calculus end at 90°. The lower diagram demonstrates the re-puncture, onto the distal neck of the calyceal extension, parallel to and between the calyceal wall and the stone
If this is successful and the wire passes between the stone and the collecting system, a track can be dilated onto the tip of the stone, which is then excavated with the sonotrode.
Fig. 6.12
The upper diagram demonstrates the puncture into the gap between the stone and calyx, allowing the guide wire to be advanced medially (lower diagram)
If one cannot advance sufficient guide wire to obtain a stable track, the straight wire should be removed and exchanged for a J wire.
As the J wire is advanced, its rounded leading edge will often “roll” between the stone and calyceal wall to create a space sufficient to introduce enough guide wire into the kidney for dilatation of the track.
Fig. 6.13
Although the puncture has accessed the space between the stone and collecting system, the straight wire will not advance. By exchanging the straight wire with a “J wire”, the “rolling edge” will often work its way along between the stone and the calyceal wall
In the event of the above procedures failing to establish a stable length of guide wire within the collecting system for dilatation, the “retroperitoneal guide wire” (RPGW) technique can be employed.
Fig. 6.14
The first stage of the RPGW technique. The stone is located by crepitus on contact with the needle. The needle is advanced through the kidney and a floppy-tipped guide wire threaded into the retroperitoneum until it is seen to coil
Fig. 6.15
Second-stage RPGW technique. The dilator is advanced until the tip contacts the stone. This can be confirmed by screening, “reverse parallax” and crepitus
After all attempts to introduce a guide wire into the collecting system have failed, re-puncture and advance the nephrostomy needle to touch the outer edge of the calyceal extension of the calculus.
Gently angle the needle and continue to pass it through the renal substance until it exits into the retroperitoneum. Having felt the stone by crepitus with the puncture, the needle and subsequently the guide wire will be in direct contact with the calculus.
After the needle has been advanced into the retroperitoneum, the needle and stylet are removed, leaving only the sheath in situ. A floppy-tipped hydrophilic guide wire is then introduced into the needle sheath and advanced so that it passes the stone and coils in the retroperitoneum.
This coiling gives the wire stability and allows the surgeon to dilate directly onto the stone.
By using one of the above techniques, the surgeon has established a stable guide wire for track dilatation. Now there is a guide wire adjacent to the calculus, the surgeon can make a track to the outer edge of the kidney. However, there will still be insufficient space between the stone and the collecting system to allow safe insertion of an Amplatz sheath or the nephroscope. A nephrotomy must now be developed so that the surgeon can see the calculus and create a cavity sufficient for the Amplatz sheath to safely enter the kidney.
Technique of Creating an Endoscopic Nephrotomy
Following the establishment of a guide wire adjacent to the stone using one of the above techniques, a 26 Fr dilator (I use a single stage) is advanced under II monitoring over the guide wire until the tip of the dilator is touching the calculus.
This is determined by screening, Parallax and the sensation of crepitus when the dilator tip contacts the stone.
The dilator should not be advanced further. Forcing the dilator between the calculus and the kidney will split the parenchyma and cause bleeding.
An Amplatz sheath is passed over the dilator until its leading edge is flush with the shoulder of the dilator. This is confirmed on II and the proximal dilator shaft marker if using the Webb dilator If the dilator is barely in the kidney, reverse the Amplatz sheath so the flat or non oblique end abuts the renal capsule.
An experienced assistant is required because they must maintain the Amplatz sheath precisely after removal of the dilator. A nephroscope is passed through the Amplatz sheath alongside the guide wire.
Fig. 6.16
The first stage of an endoscopic nephrotomy, the Amplatz sheath is advanced as close to the stone as possible over a dilator without splitting the parenchyma and the surgeon looks into the sheath following the guide wire
All clots within the Amplatz sheath are removed using alligator forceps.
The blunt tips of the alligator forceps are gently inserted alongside the guide wire through the parenchyma and opened, to separate the parenchyma, similar to creating an open nephrotomy. This is continued until the stone is visible.
When the stone is visible, it is safe to gently advance the nephroscope (but not the Amplatz sheath), to excavate a sufficient volume of stone using a sonotrode to create a cavity large enough for the safe advancement of the Amplatz sheath, either under direct vision or by reintroducing the dilator into the calyx.
Fig. 6.17
Excavation of the outer stone in the calyx through the endoscopic nephrotomy to create a cavity for the introduction of the Amplatz sheath into the calyx
At this stage, it is helpful to establish a guide wire into the collecting system. This will stabilise the track and enable the surgeon to introduce larger dilators and Amplatz sheaths for more efficient removal of the calculus.
By the time the surgeon has excavated enough stone for the Amplatz sheath to enter the calyx, it is usually possible to thread a second guide wire under vision between the calyceal wall and the stone, parallel to both of them, until the wire enters the renal pelvis and if fortunate, goes down the ureter.
Fig. 6.18
Endoscopic placement of a guide wire into the collecting system after introduction of the Amplatz sheath. Often, although stone and the calyceal wall are visible, it is not clear which is the most direct route from the calyx to the renal pelvis
A useful aid for determining the direction of the renal pelvis is the retrograde infusion of methylene blue solution.
A pre-prepared solution of normal saline and methylene blue is infused through the retrograde catheter by the assistant.
Fig. 6.19
Identification of the direction to the renal pelvis using RG injection of a saline and methylene blue solution
The surgeon is directed by the blue flushes to the space between the stone and calyceal wall, which indicates the direction in which to pass the guide wire through the nephroscope, or further excavate with the sonotrode. As the stone bulk is reduced, the methylene blue infusion becomes more profuse and the path for the guide wire clearer.
As soon as the surgeon reaches the renal pelvis, a UGW should be established.
Fig. 6.20
Establishment of UGW
Before introducing the UGW from the bladder end of the RGC, the assistant must remove the minimum volume extension tubing from the Leur lock. The assistant then introduces the floppy end of a straight hydrophilic guide wire into the ureteric catheter and threads it towards the kidney.
The surgeon identifies the wire endoscopically as it enters the pelvis.
It can be confusing as to whether the wire seen in the pelvis is the nephrostomy or the retrograde wire.
If the assistant “wiggles” the ureteric wire up and down, this manoeuvre identifies the UGW. If not, II screening will assist the surgeon in identifying the correct wire.
Once the UGW is identified, it is grasped by the surgeon and extracted through the Amplatz sheath. Both ends of the UGW are then grasped with artery forceps, which are separately fixed to the drapes at either end.
Now the PNCL becomes straightforward and safe as the guide wire cannot be displaced. It becomes now a simple procedure for the surgeon to upsize the nephrostomy track size to 28 or 32 Fr over the UGW. The larger sheath size greatly facilitates flushing, irrigation, vision and stone removal.
If the stone is hard and large, it is usually more efficient at this stage to exchange the ultrasonic lithotrite for the pneumatic lithoclast.
The PCNL should proceed through this primary track until all visible stone has been cleared.
Once this is achieved, the surgeon must assess the progress of the procedure.
It is generally accepted that even an uncomplicated PCNL should not continue in excess of 2 h of nephroscopy.
After this period, the incidence of blood loss, infection, patient instability and “TUR syndrome” increases significantly. It is always acceptable to place a small “Cope” nephrostomy and complete the PCNL safely at a later date.
Therefore, if more than 2 h has elapsed or the patient is unstable, a nephrostomy should be inserted and the procedure terminated.
If the stone along the primary track is cleared, the patient is stable, and less than 2 h have elapsed, the PCNL may continue, usually requiring two or more separate targeted nephrostomies.
Supplementary Target Punctures during Staghorn Calculus Removal
The existing Amplatz sheath should be left in situ.
This tamponades the existing track and fixes the kidney, making further punctures easier. The sheath also acts as an excellent venting drain for blood, irrigant and stone fragments during PCNL through other calyces. Having punctured a secondary calyx, a modified “calyx to calyx UGW” can be established, which provides increased stability for the subsequent dilatations.
I usually find that the primary or initial track is the best site for the nephrostomy at the end of the PCNL. Before placing the final nephrostomy tube, the initial track should be reinspected. In most cases, copious stone and blood clot will be in the renal pelvis, having fallen centrally during clearing of the secondary stone extensions. This debris must be cleared before final imaging and nephrostomy insertion.
Fig. 6.21
Before performing secondary nephrostomies, a UGW is established to maintain the primary track and stabilise the kidney. Separate target punctures, in the presence of an Amplatz sheath, do not need to be larger than 26 Fr. If the stone extension is not large, the Mini-PCNL instruments are very useful for secondary punctures
The needle track should be aligned parallel to the axis of the targeted calyx.
Fig. 6.22
Second calyceal puncture. The original Amplatz sheath is left to provide drainage and stabilise the kidney for the second puncture
The surgeon will know the needle is on the targeted stone by the sensation of crepitus. Due to the existing Amplatz sheath draining the kidney, it is not usually possible to inject sufficient contrast into the targeted calyx to assist with the secondary target puncture.
Following the needle puncture, a straight floppy-tipped hydrophilic guide wire is threaded through the needle sheath, past the stone and into the renal pelvis.
Fig. 6.23
Secondary calyx puncture and introduction of a guide wire into the renal pelvis
Fig. 6.24
The new guide wire is grasped by the surgeon through the original Amplatz sheath
The guide wire is extracted from the original nephrostomy, both ends are clamped, to create a modified UGW, from calyx to calyx.
Fig. 6.25
Extraction and fixation of the second guide wire to establish a modified calyx to calyx secondary UGW
The wire into the targeted calyx is now stable, and it is safe to dilate onto the stone. This secondary UGW is not essential, but if it can be created, it is very useful for the puncture and subsequent clearance of the stone fragments from the calyx and renal pelvis.
Fig. 6.26
Dilation is now straightforward over the stabilised modified UGW
The original sheath provides excellent drainage and acts as a low pressure vent for stone fragments and clots, as the PCNL continues.
Fig. 6.27
During nephrolithotomy through the secondary track, stone fragments and irrigant freely exit from the primary Amplatz sheath
Once the targeted calyx is endoscopically clear, the renal pelvis should be re-endoscoped through the primary sheath. Considerable debris will usually have passed from the targeted calyx.
I find that after extensive ultrasonic or ballistic lithotripsy that there are often multiple scattered fine 2–3 mm stone fragments that are too numerous, small or hidden in clot, to extract manually. These can be cleared very effectively by a saline flush through single or multiple Amplatz sheaths. Attach a medium-sized infant feeding tube (IFT) to a 20 cc syringe of normal saline. Introduce the tip of the IFT deep to the sheath and flush gently. As the sheath is a wide and open system, stone fragments and clot readily flush out without increasing intrarenal pressure.
If the patient is stable and there is time, further similar punctures can be made. If not, a “Cope” loop nephrostomy is inserted via the original Amplatz sheath, and the secondary access sheaths removed. Nephrostomies are not necessary for the secondary punctures.
Fig. 6.28
Nephrostomy at the termination of a complex PCNL – only one nephrostomy is needed, the other tracks will close spontaneously
Scenario Two: Complex Recurrent Infection Calculi Associated with a Chronically Infected Urinary Diversion or Associated Neurogenic Bladder
Difficulties and problems anticipated:
1.
Urine infection
In spite of medical therapy and stone clearance, the infection is never cleared, due to the underlying anatomical abnormality of the urinary drainage.
2.
Difficulties with access:
Paraplegia, spina bifida, kyphoscoliosis
Urinary diversion
In most of these patients, it is often not possible to establish retrograde ureteric catheter access at the time of the PCNL due to the urinary diversion or neurogenic bladder.
3.
Anaesthesia difficulties:
Hyperreflexia
4.
Decubitus ulceration
Indications for Stone Removal
1.
Obstruction
2.
Sepsis
3.
Decreased renal function
Aims of Treatment
Stone “palliation”. In other words, to safely remove as much stone as possible, if not all, to relieve obstruction of the ureter, pelvis or calyces and to reduce stone volume, knowing that repeat procedures will almost certainly be required in the future, whatever the outcome of this PCNL.