Autoimmune (IgG4-Related) Pancreatitis



Fig. 6.1
(a) Computed tomography (CT) appearance of diffuse AIP: the pancreatic parenchyma appears diffusely hypodense in the body-tail of the pancreas on arterial phase. (b) CT appearance of focal AIP: focal hypodensity in the head of the pancreas on pancreatic phase. (c) Magnetic resonance findings in focal AIP: the pancreatic parenchyma (arrows) appears hypointense at tail on pancreatic phase compared to body (asterisk) (“black and white” sign) at axial T2-weighted image



The involved pancreas is hypodense (hypovascular) in the early arterial phase, with a progressive enhancement in subsequent contrastographic phases (especially venous and portal phases). In focal AIP, this contrastographic pattern allows to differentiate inflammation (hypovascular in arterial and hypervascular in late phases) from pancreatic adenocarcinoma (hypovascular both in arterial and late phases).

Abdominal MRI with MRCP sequences is the most accurate method for evaluating the pancreas in AIP [3135], since it allows both parenchymal and ductal pancreatic assessment (Fig. 6.1). In AIP, the involved pancreas is hypointense in T1-weighted and hyperintense in T2-weighted sequences. Contrast-enhancement dynamics is similar to that observed in CT.

MRCP sequences after administration of secretin increase the definition of pancreatic ductal system morphology, in particular the number and length of ductal stenosis. In the diffuse forms, the main pancreatic duct is compressed and reduced in diameter, with the presence of multiple stenoses. In focal forms, a ductal stenosis at the level of the pancreatic mass is generally observed with mild upstream dilatation. The visibility of the duct at the level of the stenosis after secretin administration (so-called duct penetrating sign) is frequently observed in AIP, whereas the duct generally remains not visible after secretin in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

CT and MRI may also evaluate the possible abdominal involvement of extrapancreatic organs (biliary tract, kidney, retroperitoneum) which further supports the diagnosis of AIP.

Abdominal contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CE-US) [36, 37] and the endoscopic-ultrasound with contrast medium administration (CE-EUS) [38, 39] are useful in AIP diagnosis. In precontrastographic phase, the involved pancreas is hypoechoic, with a progressive enhancement after contrast medium injection, a sign highly suggestive of inflammation. The dynamics is similar to that of other imaging modalities (CT and MRI), but the continuous visualization of the pancreas (“real time”) by CE-US or CE-EUS allows a better assessment. In focal forms, pancreatic adenocarcinoma that remains hypoechoic after contrast medium injection can be easily diagnosed versus focal AIP [40]. However, in focal AIP, fine needle aspiration/biopsy is mandatory to diagnose AIP and/or exclude the presence of a tumor, before using steroids.

The evaluation of the response to steroid therapy by the normalization of the pancreas in diffuse AIP and the disappearance of the pancreatic lesion in focal AIP can be carried out by any imaging method. However, abdominal MRI, as it is pan exploring (vs. CE-US), free of radiation (vs. CT), and noninvasive (vs. CE-EUS), is probably the modality of choice. After steroid withdrawal, the disease recurs (often asymptomatic) in 30 to 60 % of the cases across different studies, involving in most cases the pancreas, but sometimes extrapancreatic organs (kidney, bile ducts) [14]. MRI with RMCP sequences is the radiological method recommended for the follow-up of patients, generally 3 months after steroid withdrawal and then yearly, although timing is based only on clinical experience. MRI characteristics of the pancreas in the presence of relapse are similar to those observed at clinical onset of the disease, with an increase in size of the gland, which can be focal or diffuse [31].



6.8 Other Organ Involvement


Extrapancreatic manifestations have been reported in up to 40 % of patients with type 1 AIP [41]. The most common extrapancreatic site in type 1 is the biliary tree. Chest (including mediastinal fibrosis), retroperitoneum (chronic periaortitis, retroperitoneal fibrosis), salivary glands, kidneys (tubulointerstitial nephritis) may be also affected, but the spectrum of IgG4-related disease is even larger [42]. IgG4-lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate is often found in affected organs. Involvement of the biliary tree in autoimmune pancreatitis, called or “IgG4 sclerosing cholangitis” (IgG4-SC), can be confused with primary sclerosing cholangitis or cholangiocarcinoma.


6.9 Treatment and Prognosis


Although steroids are the treatment of choice in AIP, there is no consensus on the optimal dose and tapering schedule. Initial prednisone doses range from 0.5 mg/kg/day (as proposed by Asian studies) to 1 mg/kg/day (Italy, Germany) or 40 mg regardless of the weight (the USA, the UK). This dose should be kept for at least 2–4 weeks, then tapered by 5 mg/week [14]. The efficacy ranges from 95 to 100 % and is now considered as a standard induction therapy. The relapse rate after discontinuation of steroid treatment varies from 30 to 60 %; in such cases, most investigators recommend a second course of steroid therapy for induction followed by maintenance therapy with immunosuppressants (Europe, the USA) [43] or with low-dose steroids (Asia) [14]. Azathioprine is considered the most effective drug for maintenance therapy at a dose of 2–2.5 mg/kg/day. Other immunosuppressive drugs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil) seem to be less effective. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody able to deplete B cells, has been recently proposed [43, 44]. Although a hematologic regimen (4 weekly doses of 375 mg/m2 followed by drug reinfusion every 2 months) has been proposed, we experienced a good clinical and morphological response with a rheumatologic regimen (two infusions of 1 g each at time 0 and 2 weeks, with repetition of the cycle to 6 months) (unpublished data). After the introduction of biologics, the problem of step-up vs. top-down therapy arises, similar to other diseases of the gastrointestinal tract (e.g., IBD). Based on our center experience on 231 AIP patients (at June 2015), of whom only 10 were treated with rituximab (while the remaining received mainly steroids), we suggest a step-up strategy, even for a cost-benefit assessment.

The natural history of AIP is still not clarified. Spontaneous remission can occur in patients with lower serum IgG4 levels and focal rather than diffuse enlargement of the pancreas. Steroids probably modified the natural history of the disease, particularly when the treatment is started in an early phase of the disease. Untreated AIP probably progresses from lymphoplasmacytic inflammation to extensive fibrosis that may result in permanent organ dysfunction and evolution toward an “ordinary” chronic pancreatitis [45]. Some studies have also suggested a slightly increased risk of malignancy (pancreatic, lung, colon, lymphoma) [46, 47].


References



1.

Sarles H et al (1961) Chronic inflammatory sclerosis of the pancreas–an autonomous pancreatic disease? Am J Dig Dis 6:688–698CrossRefPubMed


2.

Yoshida K et al (1995) Chronic pancreatitis caused by an autoimmune abnormality. Proposal of the concept of autoimmune pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 40(7):1561–1568CrossRefPubMed


3.

Hart PA, Zen Y, Chari ST (2015) Recent advances in autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 149(1):39–51CrossRefPubMed


4.

Frulloni L, Lunardi C (2011) Serum IgG4 in autoimmune pancreatitis: a marker of disease severity and recurrence? Dig Liver Dis 43(9):674–675CrossRefPubMed


5.

Maire F et al (2011) Outcome of patients with type 1 or 2 autoimmune pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 106(1):151–156CrossRefPubMed


6.

Frulloni L et al (2009) Autoimmune pancreatitis: differences between the focal and diffuse forms in 87 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 104(9):2288–2294CrossRefPubMed

Sep 2, 2017 | Posted by in NEPHROLOGY | Comments Off on Autoimmune (IgG4-Related) Pancreatitis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access