Anastomoses and Complications in Inflammatory Bowel and Colorectal Diseases





ABBREVIATIONS


AL


anastomotic leaks


APR


abdominopelvic resection


CD


Crohn’s disease


CI


confidence interval


CRC


colorectal surgery


EEA


end-to-end anastomosis


GI


gastrointestinal


IBD


inflammatory bowel disease


ICA


ileocolonic anastomosis


ICR


ileocolonic resection


IMA


inferior mesenteric artery


IPAA


ileal pouch–anal anastomosis


IRA


ileorectal anastomosis


LAR


low anterior resection


OR


odds ratio


UC


ulcerative colitis


INTRODUCTION


One of the main outcome measures for colorectal surgery is anastomotic complications, including leaks, bleeding, and strictures. These complications are related to surgeon factors (anastomotic tension, intestinal blood supply that is determined by surgeon decision and technique such as anatomical factors, perioperative hypoxia and resuscitation, intraoperative blood loss, and operative time), patient factors (age, smoking, alcohol use, nutrition status, body mass index, anesthesia severity assessment, comorbidities), and disease status (inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], metastatic cancer, radiation, damage control surgery, emergent surgery, peritonitis, corticosteroids immunosuppression, location of disease, and intraperitoneal location).


Bowel resection and anastomosis are commonly performed in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). The surgical operations performed include partial small bowel or colon resection, ileocolonic resection (ICR) with subsequent jejuno-ileal anastomosis, ileo-ileal anastomosis, ileocolonic anastomosis (ICA), and ileorectal anastomosis (IRA). Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the most common surgical procedure for ulcerative colitis (UC). Anastomosis is constructed at the stoma closure site and pouch-anal anastomosis. IRA is occasionally performed in selected patients with UC relatively sparing the rectum.


For colorectal cancer (CRC), surgical procedures such as partial, segmental, or subtotal colectomy, ICR, and occasionally total proctocolectomy, abdominopelvic resection (APR), and low anterior resection (LAR) are performed. For benign colorectal diseases, such as complex diverticular diseases, sigmoid volvulus, and colonic inertia, partial or subtotal colectomy is usually performed. Following colectomy, various configurations of the anastomosis may be employed with or without fecal diversion.


In this chapter, we discuss techniques of anastomosis and their associations with anastomotic complications.


ANASTOMOSIS AND HEALING


Anastomosis healing requires proper wound healing. Therefore, anastomotic leak (AL) is likely to occur when inadequate healing due to a variety of factors compromises anastomotic integrity. The colon wall consists of the mucosa, muscularis mucosae, submucosa, muscularis propria, and serosa. The submucosa, containing collagen and elastin fibers, is an important structure for anastomosis, since it is the strongest layer of the bowel wall and also provides active fibroblasts and collagen deposits. Other components of wound healing include interaction and homeostasis between gut microbiota, mucus, and mucosa, matrix for fibroblasts from serosa, perfusion, angiogenesis, capillary growth, and formation of granular tissues.


Anastomoses are commonly performed using a hand-sewn or stapled technique. A hand-sewn technique may be affected using various factors including suture materials (such as polydioxanone, polyglycolic acid, polyglactin sutures), suture formats such as the size of suture bites, an in-between distance of bites, suture tension, the configuration of the bite (inverting vs. everting sutures), a configuration of the suture (single- vs. double-layer, interrupted vs. continuous sutures), the length of the side limb, and enterotomy used for anastomosis influence anastomotic healing. For a stapled technique, linear and circular staplers are used ( Fig. 4.1A–C ). Compression anastomosis can also be performed. From the technical perspective, well-constructed anastomosis should be free of tension, have adequate blood supply, and be inverted.




Fig. 4.1


Stapled anastomosis. (A) End-to-end colorectal anastomosis. (B) End-to-end ileorectal anastomosis. (C) Side-to-side colorectal anastomosis.






The three most common complications of colorectal anastomosis are AL, anastomotic strictures (AS), and anastomotic bleeding (AB).


ANASTOMOTIC LEAKS


Inadequate blood supply and anastomotic tension, which are influenced by a combination of patient, disease, and anatomical factors, are the common reasons for AL ( Fig. 4.2A–C ) but can be compounded or mitigated by good surgical technique.




Fig. 4.2


Acute and chronic anastomotic leaks. (A) Acute leak at the ileal pouch–anal anastomosis detected with a soft-tip guidewire. (B) Chronic anastomotic leak at the colorectal anastomosis ( green arrow ). (C) Chronic anastomotic leak at the colorectal anastomosis in a patient with rectal cancer and radiation.






Surgeon Factors


The surgeon is also considered to be an independent variable for the risk of AL, which may be influenced by experience (number of procedures or years of experience) or individual technique/ability. While the role of such individual variations in the technique, decision-making, and ability is difficult and might be confounded by multiple factors, the presence of a learning curve in gaining proficiency in the performance of complex procedures, including IPAA, has been demonstrated. Operating time also influences AL and may be a reflection of a combination of factors including the complexity of the surgery, intraoperative complications, and the need for perioperative resuscitation, surgeon, disease, and patient factors.


Level of the Anastomosis


The location (left colon) and level of the anastomosis (distal) impact blood supply and possibly tension. Compromised perfusion and technical deficiency are major contributing factors for AL. A meta-analysis of 30 studies showed that high inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation in sigmoid or rectal cancer had a higher risk for AL than low ligation of IMA.


Microbiome


Gut microbiotas are also considered to play a major part in AL. While many modalities are used for preoperative colon preparation to reduce bacterial translocation, their role in the prevention of AL is not clear. , An initial study from our group demonstrated a significant reduction in AL using a combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics. A meta-analysis including 40 studies of which 28 were randomized with 69,517 patients subsequently confirmed that mechanical bowel preparation along with oral antibiotic decontamination significantly reduced the AL rate as compared with mechanical bowel preparation alone.


Suture and Configuration


Other technical factors including the type of the suture material, anastomotic technique, and configuration of the anastomosis influence anastomotic healing but are also reliant on surgical technique. A systemic review suggests that a single-layer continuous technique using inverting sutures with slowly absorbable monofilament material seems preferable to all suturing techniques to reduce ALs.


Ischemia and Tissue Hypoxia


Tissue ischemia and hypoxia play a key role in the development of anastomotic complications. Intraoperative measurements of serosal oxygen tension with an electrode-based tissue oxygen tension showed that patients with low oxygen tension had a higher frequency of AL than those with high oxygen tension. Some surgeons have used intraoperative oxygen supplements or postoperative oxygen supplements to facilitate colonic anastomosis healing. , An intraoperative visual grading system based on bleeding from the marginal vessel was proposed that was shown to predict AL.


The University of California, Irvine Endoscopy Grading Scores were proposed for colorectal anastomosis: grade 1—circumferentially normal mucosa on either side of the colorectal anastomosis; grade 2—mucosal ischemia or congestion less than 30% of the circumference on either side of the colorectal anastomosis; and grade 3—mucosal ischemia or congestion greater than 30% of the circumference on either side of the colorectal anastomosis or any degree of ischemia/congestion on both sides of the anastomosis. , A grade 2 anastomosis was associated with a higher AL rate compared to a grade 1 anastomosis (35.7% vs. 7.4%, P < .05) in a case series of 318 patients with colorectal anastomosis for benign or malignant colorectal disorders. However, most surgeons would agree that any concern with an anastomosis intraoperatively necessitates a redo anastomosis, suggesting that an astute surgeon would only accept a grade 1 score.


Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Techniques


Multiple studies showed that AL is comparable between stapled and hand-sewn anastomosis. However, a recent meta-analysis of six studies of 955 patients with ICA showed that stapled functional end-to-end ileocolic anastomosis is associated with fewer leaks than hand-sewn anastomosis. The expert surgeon judiciously uses both hand-sewn and stapled techniques depending on the individual patient and intraoperative situation based on the location of the anastomosis, access to the area, tissue quality and tension, surgery type, complexity, and duration, to name a few factors.


Configuration of Anastomosis


Configuration or orientation of colorectal anastomosis can be end-to-end ( Fig. 4.1A and B ), end-to-side, side-to-end, and side-to-side (isoperistaltic or antiperistaltic) ( Fig. 4.1C ), which can be achieved with hand-sewn or stapled anastomosis. In a meta-analysis of five studies involving 860 patients with end-to-side anastomosis and 1126 with side-to-side anastomosis, the former group has a lower risk for AL (odds ratio [OR] = 0.185; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.054–0.627; P = .007). As with the choice of hand-sewn versus stapled techniques, surgical decision-making depends on the particular circumstance, rather than a rigid approach based on such data, to promote the best outcomes.


Laparoscopic Versus Open Approaches


Various studies have reported comparable AL after laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy. A laparoscopic approach in obese patients may have a higher risk for AL than open surgery, probably due to anatomy and limitation of the instrument.


Intraluminal Pressure


Intraluminal pressure may be a contributing factor for AL. A meta-analysis showed the placement of a transanal drainage tube reduces the risk of AL after anterior rection for rectal cancer. However, a recent randomized controlled trial of 560 patients with LAR for rectal cancer failed to show that the placement of transanal drainage tubes reduced AL as compared to control (N = 18; 6.4% vs. N = 19; 6.8%, P = .87). There has been concern about luminal air and pressure of salvage endoscopic therapy for AL. A meta-analysis of 16 studies that included salvage stents, over-the-scope endoscopic clips, vacuum therapy, and fibrin glue for AL from colorectal surgery showed that the endoscopic approach may be safe.


Intraoperative Testing of the Integrity of the Anastomosis


Intraoperative ICG fluorescent angiography can effectively assess vascularization of the colic stump and anastomosis in patients undergoing colorectal resection. , Its value in reducing AL is, however, controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies totaling 7115 patients showed that intraoperative documentation of integrity (OR = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.34–0.82, P < .001) and perfusion (OR = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.22–0.752, P < .001) of the lower gastrointestinal tract anastomoses with ICG is associated with significantly lower rate of AL. Intraoperative testing of air leaks may predict the need for reoperation of AL. ,


Role of Defunctioning Ostomy


While a proximal defunctioning ostomy (loop ileostomy of colostomy) does not reduce AL, it may mitigate the consequences of an AL when this does occur, since it reduces fecal contamination of the site of the leak. Thus, a defunctioning stoma reduces the need for reoperation for severe leaks and might promote healing when AL does occur. However, the creation of a defunctioning ostomy necessitates further surgery for closure and the presence of an ostomy might in itself be associated with various complications.


ANASTOMOTIC STRICTURES


Anastomotic strictures are common ( Figs. 4.3A–C ; 4.4A–C ; 4.5A–C ). A study of 179 patients with colorectal anastomosis showed a rate of AS of 21%, defined as the inability to pass a rigid sigmoidoscope through the area. The reported rates of benign colorectal AS range from 5% to 20%. Risk factors for refractory colorectal AS are neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or a history of AL. AS can be treated with endoscopic balloon dilation ( Fig. 4.3C ) and endoscopic stricturotomy ( Figs. 4.4A–C ; 4.5A–C ).


Feb 15, 2025 | Posted by in GASTROENTEROLOGY | Comments Off on Anastomoses and Complications in Inflammatory Bowel and Colorectal Diseases

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access