Patient population
Intervention
Comparator
Outcomes studied
Patients with recurrent fissure after Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy
Repeat LIS
1. Advancement flap
2. Botox
Cure, continence, patient satisfaction
Table 35.2
Results of literature search
Authors | Year published | Study type | # of patients | Treatments compared | Failure rate | New incontinence rate | Other outcomes measured |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brisinda et al. | 2008 | Case Series | 80 | Botulinum Toxin Inject vs. No comparison provided | 22 % at 1 month | Baseline incontinence not measured; 10 % incontinence at 1 month; none long term | NA |
Liang et al. | 2015 | Case Series | 57 | Lateral Internal sphincterotomy vs. No comparison provided | 2 % | 7.4 % | Patient Satisfaction: Significantly improved after intervention |
Summary for Box
No recommendation can be made regarding treatment of recurrent anal fissure after lateral internal sphincterotomy. (evidence quality: very low).
References
1.
2.
Garcia-Aguilar J et al. Open vs. closed sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(4):440–3.CrossRefPubMed