15 Rectovaginal and Rectourethral Fistulas



10.1055/b-0038-166149

15 Rectovaginal and Rectourethral Fistulas

Janice F. Rafferty and Emily F. Midura


Abstract


Rectovaginal fistulas are congenital or acquired epithelial-lined tract between the rectum and vagina. Although an uncommon percentage of anorectal fistulas, they are significant challenges for patients and providers. This chapter looks at the definition and classification, etiology, presentation, evaluation, and management of rectovaginal fistula.




15.1 Introduction


A rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is a congenital or acquired epithelial-lined tract between the rectum and vagina. RVFs comprise 5% of all anorectal fistulas and lead to significant morbidity in women. Because of the significant variation in presentation and anatomy, successful treatment can be very complex.



15.1.1 Definition and Classification


RVFs are classified based on location, size, and etiology—a classification system that helps guide both diagnosis and operative intervention. RVF can occur anywhere along distal two-thirds of the anterior rectal wall where it is adjacent to the posterior vaginal wall, and is defined as a communication between the vagina and the rectum above the dentate line; in comparison, an anovaginal fistula is located below the dentate line. The terms “low” RVF and “anovaginal” fistula are sometimes interchangeably used. Most RVFs form between the dentate line and the posterior vaginal fornix. 1 RVFs are further classified as “low” when they are at or slightly above the dentate line, “high” when the vaginal opening is behind or near the cervix, and “middle” if the fistula lies between these two areas (▶ Fig. 15.1). Regarding size, “small” fistulas are typically < 0.5 cm, “medium” are from 0.5 to 2.5 cm, and “large” fistulas are > 2.5 cm in diameter. Other classification schemes have been suggested based on etiology rather than location. 1 The fistula may also be described as “simple” if it is small and direct, or “complex” if it is high, or due to radiation, malignancy, inflammatory bowel disease, or unintended complication of a pelvic anastomosis. The reality is that given the difficulty in curing some of these fistulas, the categorization of some of them as “simple” seems a misnomer.

Fig. 15.1 Classification of rectovaginal fistulas by location.


15.2 Etiology


RVFs can result from congenital malformations or a variety of acquired disorders. Many acquired fistulas arise from obstetric injuries, 2 with neoplasms, radiation injury, inflammatory bowel disease, 3 infections, and trauma contributing as well.



15.2.1 Obstetric Injuries


RVF can acutely develop with a perineal tear or surgical episiotomy, or as a delayed complication of traumatic vaginal delivery. Risk factors for development of obstetric fistulas include episiotomy, third- and fourth-degree lacerations, prolonged labor, and high forceps deliveries. 4 It is estimated that episiotomy and third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations occur in up to 5% of vaginal births. 5 About 10% of defects repaired in the acute setting fail; two-thirds of those that fail require reoperative intervention. 5 Approximately 0.05 to 0.1% of midline episiotomies lead to RVF, whereas up to 1% of third- and fourth-degree lacerations will be complicated by RVF often due to missed injuries, inadequate repair of an identified injury, or secondary infection of a repaired wound. 5 Prolonged labor results in persistent pressure on the rectovaginal septum resulting in ischemia of the septum, which can fistulize in the postpartum period. 4 , 6 The development of anal ulcers, anorectal abscesses after delivery, and sphincter injuries during delivery are also possible etiologies. When considering operative repair of RVF resulting from traumatic vaginal delivery, it is important to remember that almost half of obstetric injuries also involve the anal sphincter. 7



15.2.2 Neoplasm and Pelvic Radiation


Malignant RVF can be the result of a primary, recurrent, or metastatic neoplasm. Common solid neoplasms that cause RVF include colorectal, anal, cervical, uterine, and vaginal cancers. Blood cancers such as leukemia, aplastic anemia, and agranulocytosis can cause RVF but are rare. 8 Gynecologic malignancies treated with pelvic radiation can lead to RVF, 9 , 10 , 11 typically presenting 6 months to 2 years after treatment is completed; incidence is related to the dose of radiation delivered, 12 but risk is increased in the setting of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and previous abdominopelvic surgery. 11 Radiation-induced proctitis can lead to mucosal ulceration with eventual erosion through the full thickness of the rectal and eventually vaginal wall. Patients with radiation proctitis typically describe rectal pressure and a constant urge to defecate; this tends to abate when the fistula forms, at which time complaints transition to feculent drainage from the vagina and persistent vaginitis.



15.2.3 Inflammatory Bowel Disease


The incidence of RVF in inflammatory bowel disease ranges from 6 to 23%. 3 , 13 , 14 Crohn’s disease, and specifically Crohn’s proctitis, is a more common cause when compared to ulcerative colitis, due to transmural inflammation and associated perianal disease. 15 Some success with medical management of RVF has been achieved in Crohn’s patients with use of metronidazole, 16 chemotherapeutic agents such as methotrexate 17 and cyclosporine, 18 and more recently with remicade 19 and other anti-TNF agents. The rate of failure to heal the fistula with any medical therapy remains high, and treatment is usually aimed at control of symptoms and stabilization of acute flares to optimize patients for eventual surgical intervention. 20 There are reports of adenocarcinoma developing in the setting of chronic inflammation due to Crohn’s disease that may result in fistula formation, 13 as well as adenocarcinoma developing in chronic Crohn’s fistulas. Patients with longstanding fistulas-in-ano due to Crohn’s disease who do not heal with medical or surgical therapy are at risk for malignant degeneration and should be carefully examined in this setting. Behçet’s disease, while rare, can also cause RVF. 21



15.2.4 Infection


Pelvic infectious processes including diverticulitis, perirectal abscess due to cryptoglandular abscess, venereal disease, abdominal tuberculosis, and pelvic inflammatory disease can lead to RVF. Bartholin’s abscesses, as well as infections collecting in the pouch of Douglas, can drain through the rectovaginal septum. Colovaginal fistulas due to diverticulitis, masquerading as high RVFs, occur and are more prevalent in women who have undergone hysterectomy.



15.2.5 Trauma and Miscellaneous Causes


Operative trauma can lead to the inadvertent development of RVF. Both vaginal and rectal operations complicated by infections, wound breakdown, or anastomotic leak can lead to tissue infection, abscess development, ischemia, and fistula development. Low colorectal or coloanal anastomoses, specifically circular stapled anastomoses, 22 the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, and stapled transanal rectal resections, 23 run the risk of including the posterior vaginal wall in the anastomosis if the operating surgeon is not careful. Urogynecologic operations that involve mesh placement adjacent to the rectum and vagina also carry a risk of infection, with subsequent inflammation and fistula formation. Trauma to the vagina or anus from blunt and penetrating injuries can disrupt healthy tissue resulting in development of a fistula. Fecal impaction resulting in stercoral ulcer and pressure necrosis, 24 prolonged pessary usage, 25 and ergotamine suppositories 26 have also been cited as causes of RVF.



15.3 Clinical Presentation and Evaluation


Symptoms and presentation of RVFs vary based on the etiology. Presentation ranges from chronic vaginitis with foul or feculent smelling discharge to obvious passage of flatus or stool from the vagina. Women may also present with recurrent urinary tract infections, perineal pain, and/or dyspareunia. Patients may complain of passing blood or mucus from the anus, diarrhea, or fecal incontinence from associated sphincter injury.


Physical examination and imaging evaluation should confirm the presence of a fistula. Most low fistulas are palpable on rectovaginal examination, and can be visualized with vaginal speculum evaluation or proctosigmoidoscopy. The darker red, smooth vaginal mucosa often contrasts with the lighter rectal mucosa. Stool may also be found in the vagina on speculum exam. For small fistulas, a probe may be necessary to locate the tract as the openings often appear as a small depression or pit-like defect. Hydrogen peroxide–enhanced exams under anesthesia with or without transanal ultrasound can assist with difficult diagnoses. 27 , 28 If one is unable to identify a clear fistula tract on exam, water can be instilled into the vagina, the rectum insufflated with a sigmoidoscope or a bulb syringe; the presence of bubbles will confirm the diagnosis. A tampon test may be useful with a difficult diagnosis as well. Specifically, a tampon is inserted into the vagina, and methylene blue instilled in the rectum and held for 15 to 20 minutes. Tampon staining is diagnostic of RVF. On rare occasions, extensive clinical testing will fail to confirm the presence of a fistula, despite highly suspicious signs and symptoms. In this situation, certain imaging studies may be useful, and include hydrogen peroxide–enhanced transanal ultrasound, limited barium enemas, contrast vaginography, CT scans, and MRI. Magnetic resonance imaging has a high sensitivity in the diagnosis of fistulas in the anorectal region, 29 and may be the most practical imaging study to obtain when searching for the origin and characteristics of a fistula. Clinical presentation and physical exam findings often guide the decision for appropriate imaging techniques. If necessary, an examination under anesthesia may be the only method by which the fistula can be identified.


Once the presence of a fistula has been confirmed, it is essential to determine size and location, and evaluate for associated infections, overall tissue health, need for abscess drainage, and sphincter integrity. This goal can often be accomplished by physical exam; however, imaging, as described above and including endoscopy, may be required. While associated sphincter injury can often be suspected based on history, anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound can be useful adjuncts to assess sphincter competence, 7 , 30 and can influence choice of repair. 31 Evaluation should also exclude the involvement of contiguous organs and assess for the presence of acute infections, inflammatory bowel disease, radiation injury, and neoplasm. For example, the finding of nodular or friable tissue adjacent to a fistula may be suggestive of malignancy; uniform or diffuse tissue friability is more likely consistent with radiation-induced changes or inflammatory bowel disease. Appropriate biopsies and metastatic evaluation should be performed if there is concern for new or recurrent neoplasia, and CT or MR enterography should be considered in patients with a history or suspicion for inflammatory bowel disease.



15.4 Surgical Management


Prior to surgical intervention, underlying pathologies that require medical management should be addressed. Patients with Crohn’s or other inflammatory conditions should be medically optimized; patients with a history of pelvic malignancy need a full metastatic assessment. A trial of nonoperative management for obstetric injuries should include sitz baths, perineal wound care, and bowel regimens. While hyperbaric oxygen has been suggested as treatment for infection-related fistulas, 32 the majority of symptomatic fistulas require operative intervention.



15.4.1 Operative Timing


Timing and need for operative repair is guided by both the size and etiology of the RVF. More than half of small fistulas from obstetric trauma will heal spontaneously. Therefore, it is recommended to wait 3 to 6 months after delivery prior to operative repair 33 , 34 to allow resolution of acute inflammation, which may promote spontaneous healing the majority of the time. 35 However, if a large tear is noted at the time of delivery, repair should be undertaken in the delivery room. 36 If there is an infectious or inflammatory component to an RVF, draining seton placement may be beneficial to help clear the infection and allow contraction and fibrosis of the tract. Seton placement will allow time for medical optimization in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, provide symptomatic relief for poor operative candidates, or provide an interval of time needed for treatment of neoplasia as well.



15.4.2 Operative Approach


Operative repair can be performed through abdominal or local procedures, including perineal, vaginal, rectal, transsphincteric, or transsacral approaches. Regardless of the approach used, adequate mobilization of the vagina and rectum must be ensured to prevent undue tension on the repair and to avoid direct apposition of suture lines to try to limit recurrence. Fecal diversion can also help control symptoms and infection, promote healing, and may even be used for definitive management in poor operative candidates. Sphincter function should also be assessed and taken into consideration when planning a strategy for repair.



15.4.3 Perioperative Management


Smoking and Crohn’s disease are the most common risk factors for recurrence of RVF following operative repair, so preoperative smoking cessation and medical control of inflammatory bowel disease are encouraged. 37 Mechanical bowel prep, vaginal cleansing, and perioperative antibiotics are recommended for both local and abdominal procedures. The bladder is decompressed with a catheter, and ureteral stent placement should be considered if difficult pelvic dissection is anticipated. Hospital stays are dependent on the extent of repair, operative blood loss, patient age, and comorbidities. Patients should postoperatively abstain from any vaginal penetration for 6 to 8 weeks.



15.4.4 Management of Recurrence


Approach to repairing recurrent RVF is guided by both the etiology of the fistula and the previous operative technique. Key to success is the introduction of new healthy tissue with adequate blood supply and debridement of all nonviable and infected tissues. Success rates approaching 90% can often be achieved despite the need for multiple repairs. 37



15.5 Operative Repairs



15.5.1 Simple Fistulotomy


Anovaginal fistulas that do not have extensive involvement of the sphincter mechanism can be managed with laying open of the fistula tract and healing by secondary intention. This approach has been abandoned for higher RVFs as it is likely to impair fecal continence.



15.5.2 Conversion to Complete Perineal Laceration


One local approach for repair of fistulas with extensive anal sphincter defects and fecal incontinence is episioproctotomy with reconstruction of the anorectal-vaginal septum. This procedure should include excision of the fistula tract, division of the adjacent sphincters and perineal body, and then layered closure of all the tissues (▶ Fig. 15.2). This method is similar to the classic technique for closure of fourth-degree perineal lacerations following obstetric trauma, and leads to a high rate of healing of the fistula and improved fecal continence. 38 This procedure is generally performed in lithotomy position, with a full-thickness incision made between the anus and vagina. The rectal mucosa, internal and external sphincters, and the vaginal mucosa are each closed separately. The sphincters may be closed in a single layer if dissection is difficult. Healing of this extensive repair may be promoted by proximal diversion of the fecal stream.

Fig. 15.2 Conversion of rectovaginal fistula to complete perianal laceration and layer closure via transvaginal approach. (a) Entire rectovaginal fistula tract, including the sphincters and perineal body, is incised. (b) Vaginal wall is dissected from perineal body. Layered repair is begun with closure of the (c) rectal mucosa, (d) internal and external sphincters, and (e) reconstruction of the perineal body and closure of the vaginal epithelium.

The Musset technique is a two-stage procedure in which a perineoproctotomy is performed followed by a layered closure 8 weeks later. Healing rates of 98 to 100% are reported and 75% of patients maintain sphincter function with this approach. 39 , 40 Patients who present with a cloacal defect can also be managed with a similar layered repair. 41 Some authors advocate sphincterotomy in the 5 o’clock position opposing the anterior repair if sphincter reconstruction is performed, 42 and others describe X-flap anoplasty to recreate the perineal body. 41



15.5.3 Fistula Excision with Layered Closure


Excision of the fistula with layered closure can be completed through a vaginal, rectal, perineal, or transsphincteric approach. Fistulas associated with sphincter defects are often approached through these techniques and muscle flaps utilized if there is significant tissue loss or damage.


In the perineal approach, the patient is in prone jackknife and a 180-degree curvilinear perianal incision just anterior to the anal verge, or Schuchardt incision, is used. The vagina is opened to the level of the lateral fornix and perineal dissection extended to healthy tissue at least 1 to 2 cm above the fistula and associated scar. Once the fistula tract is identified and transected, the levators are plicated, and the vagina, sphincter fibers, and rectal mucosa are closed in layers. Care should be taken to avoid direct apposition of suture lines; the vaginal side may be left open for drainage. The curvilinear incision is then closed in a V–Y flap fashion, reconstructing the breadth of a normal perineal body. 6 A transrectal approach has also been described which avoids the need for a perineal incision 8 but may require advancement of rectal mucosa to cover the defect left by excision of the fistula.


A transsphincteric approach can also be used. While first described to close rectourethral fistulas (RUFs), this technique can be used to fully expose more proximal tracts and reduce the need for transabdominal repairs. 43 The patient is placed in prone jackknife position and the buttocks retracted laterally with adhesive tape. The incision extends from the anal margin to the midsacrum just to the left of midline. The mucocutaneous junction and sphincter muscles are marked with stay sutures. The rectal mucosa is then divided to expose the fistula, the fistula and surrounding scar tissue excised, and the vaginal opening is closed primarily. The incision in the anterior rectal wall is then transversely extended, full-thickness flaps are mobilized, and the rectum is closed using a “vest over pants” technique. The sphincter muscles are then reapproximated and the skin closed.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 17, 2020 | Posted by in GASTROENTEROLOGY | Comments Off on 15 Rectovaginal and Rectourethral Fistulas

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access